Spelling suggestions: "subject:"bilitary construction operations"" "subject:"hilitary construction operations""
1 |
Alternative to low bid selection in Air Force reserve military constructionGarner, Birtice A. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (M. S.)--Building Construction, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010. / Committee Chair: Castro-Lacouture, Daniel; Committee Member: McElroy, James H.; Committee Member: Roper, Kathy. Part of the SMARTech Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Collection.
|
2 |
Design build project delivery in the Air Force Reserve CommandRichardson, Kathleen 01 July 2009 (has links)
Design Build is rapidly becoming one of the most commonly used project delivery methods in the construction industry. The United States Corp of Engineers (USACE) has started implementing its own version of Design Build with the introduction of Military Transformation in April 2005. Per the Department of the Army (2008) Military Transformation is a term employed by the Corps to implement the use of alternate project
delivery method as a means of achieving best value. The United States Air Force (AF)
and the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) are expected to establish a target of 75% of
all future Military Construction Projects (MILCONs) executed when using the Design
Build method. The use of this delivery method results in significant changes to the
relationships between the various parties associated with facility project delivery
compared to the traditional Design Bid Build method. AFRC construction project
procedures and requirements must also change.
|
3 |
Alternative to low bid selection in Air Force reserve military construction: approach to best value procurementGarner, Birtice A. 01 July 2009 (has links)
Best value is becoming one of the most commonly used procurement methods in the facility construction industry. The Federal Government and the Air Force Reserve predominant project delivery approach has been via the low-bid award. This process has not been successful, documented by large numbers of construction modifications, as well as project cost and schedule growth over the past sixteen years. Recently, federal procurement agencies have attempted to move toward construction awards based upon best value principles relative to performance and price. The United States Army Corps of Engineers best value procurement vehicle known as Military Transformation fails to deliver true best value. This pseudo best value delivery process: (1) fails to objectively rate and apply contractor past performance; (2) lacks the means to monetarily quantify contractor proposal risks; and (3) provides no means of transferring control and responsibility for risks and risk minimization to the contractor. Only a true best value project delivery system can provide the urgently required increased efficiency necessary for Air Force Reserve Command to remain a dependable military institution capable of erecting facilities contributory to our nation's defense by perpetually adding value to the project delivery process.
|
Page generated in 0.1618 seconds