Submitted by Silvana Teresinha Dornelles Studzinski (sstudzinski) on 2015-05-25T15:36:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Eduardo Luiz Medeiros.pdf: 2023065 bytes, checksum: f2bdf9e12284e44135c945a57cccbc8a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-25T15:36:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Eduardo Luiz Medeiros.pdf: 2023065 bytes, checksum: f2bdf9e12284e44135c945a57cccbc8a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-27 / Nenhuma / As arbitrariedades nos processos administrativos disciplinares militares são um fenômeno que vem se manifestando nas instituições militares pós-Constituição de 1988. Violações a princípios como devido processo legal, legalidade, estado de inocência, ampla defesa e contraditório, proporcionalidade da punição, respeito à dignidade da pessoa humana, razoabilidade e proporcionalidade, dentre outros, são comuns nas casernas. Este estudo analisa abusos decorrentes nos processos disciplinares nas Forças Armadas e Forças Auxiliares, demonstrando violações constitucionais do processo em casos concretos pós-redemocratização por meio de pesquisa doutrinária e jurisprudencial. Tal fato torna-se um enigma, ou seja, o enigma da legalidade autoritária, invertendo-se o Estado Democrático de Direito pelo Estado de Exceção. Resposta disso é fruto de um militarismo conservador, com a mesma tradição do período ditatorial (1964-1985) empleno século XXI, soçobrando direitos e garantias constitucionais do processo assegurados pela Carta Magna. Seria a falta de uma justiça de transição? A saída dessa “legalidade” autoritária passa pela conscientização e pelo respeito aos direitos humanos, inerentes ao homem. O que se busca é justamente a transição do Estado de Exceção para o Estado Democrático de Direito, tendo em vista que, sem direitos do homem reconhecidos e efetivamente protegidos, não existe democracia; sem democracia não existem condições mínimas para a solução pacífica dos conflitos que surgem entre os indivíduos e entre grupos. / The arbitrariness in administrative disciplinary military proceedings are a phenomenon that hás manifested itself in military institutions after the Constitution of 1988. Violations as: due process of law, legality, state of innocence, legal defense and contradictory, disproportionate punishments, lack of respect for human dignity, fairness and proportionality, among others, are common in the barracks. This study examines abuses in disciplinary proceedings in the Armed Forces and Auxiliary Forces, showing constitutional violations of the process in individual cases after (re) democratization through doctrinal and jurisprudential research. This fact becomes a puzzle, the puzzle of authoritarian legality, reverting the Democratic State of Law to a State Exception. The answer to that is the result of a conservative militarism, with the same tradition of the dictatorship period (1964-1985) in the XXI century, capsizing constitutional rights and guarantees of the process provided by the Constitution. Would it be a lack of transitional justice? The output of this authoritarian “legality” is awareness and respect for human rights inherent in man. What is sought is precisely the transition from the State of Exception by the Democratic State of Law, considering that without human rights recognized and effectively protected there is no democracy, and without democracy there is no minimum conditions for the peaceful settlement of conflicts that arise between individuals and between groups.

Au Moyen Âge apparaissent régulièrement des hommes d’Église en armes, souvent des évêques. A la fois prêtres et seigneurs, ces hommes se battent pour des raisons variées : le service du roi, la cause de l’Église, ou encore pour leurs propres intérêts. Cette thèse a pour objet l'étude de ces hommes et des normes culturelles, juridiques et sociales qui conditionnent leur conduite : culture noble et militaire, devoirs envers le roi, droit canonique. La Période étudiée s'étend du début du Grand Schisme (1378) à la veille de la Réforme luthérienne (1517). C'est une période marquée par la guerre, surtout pendant la première moitié du siècle ; les prélats prennent souvent part à ces conflits. D'un autre côté, la Guerre de Cent Ans favorise l'évolution des institutions militaires, une modernisation qui tend à décharger les ecclésiastiques de leurs devoirs d'origine féodale. Les prélats qui participent aux guerres, même les plus scandaleux, ne sont que rarement punis. Lors des conciles, des critiques à leur encontre sont exprimées, mais elles ne conduisent à aucune mesure concrète. En fait, de nombreuses raisons peuvent justifier la conduite des prélats combattants. / In the Middle Ages, Clerics bearing arms, often bishops, regularly appear. Both priests and secular lords, these men fight for various reasons: to serve the king, for the cause of the Church, or even for their own interests. This is a study of these prelates and of the cultural, legal and social norms that condition their behaviour: noble and military culture, various services owed to the the king, limits brought by canon law. The chosen period begins with the Great Schism (1378) and ends at the dawn of the Lutherian Reform (1517). In France, this time is marked by the omnipresence of war, especially in the first half of the century; prelates often have to take part in these conflicts. On the other hand, the Hundred Years War induce the development of new military institutions, which tend to discharge bishops and abbots from the old feudal obligations. Prelates who engage in warfare are only rarely punished, even the most scandalous ones.At the councils, critics are expressed against them, but they lead to no conclusion. In fact, many reasons may justify the conduct of fighting bishops.