Spelling suggestions: "subject:"foments off inertia."" "subject:"foments oof inertia.""
1 |
Moment of inertia in heavy nuclei.Plattner, Gunther Antone. January 1969 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Experimental determination of inertia and rolling moment derivatives due to yaw and sideslip of the boomerang model.Moten, John Michael. January 1957 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis--University of Adelaide, 1957 (presented for Angas Engineering Scholarship). / Typewritten.
|
3 |
Moment of inertia in heavy nuclei.Plattner, Gunther Antone. January 1969 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
Additional moments of inertia of a full-scale airplane and its effects on dynamic lateral stabilityLucas, Robert Earl 12 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
The suspension bridge with a stiffening truss of variable moment of inertiaCoe, Frantz Eli. January 1934 (has links)
Thesis (D. SC.)--University of Michigan. / "Photo-lithoprint." Bibliography: p. 37.
|
6 |
The effect of deck rigidity in an open-spandrel arch structureHaney, James Thomas 08 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The moment rotation characteristics of reinforced concrete beams : an application of the photostress technique.Mamet, Jean Claude. January 1968 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
The moment rotation characteristics of reinforced concrete beams : an application of the photostress technique.Mamet, Jean Claude. January 1968 (has links)
No description available.
|
9 |
DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS IN AN ORGAN CULTURE MODELHeil, Bradley R. 01 January 2010 (has links)
Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a surgical procedure in which applied strain stimulates new bone growth; however, the underlying mechanisms by which bone cells respond to load are still uncertain. An organ culture model of DO was developed and validated by using linear distraction on the femoral shafts of 5 day old Wistar rats. Two loading regimes were utilized: distracting the bones for 2 hrs on day 1 (GRP I); distracting the bones for 2 hrs on days 1, 3, and 5 (GRP II). After 1 week in culture, the bones were compared to unloaded contralateral controls and assessed for changes. Structural, dimensional, massing, micro-CT, areal, and viability properties were obtained from testing. Relative to paired controls, distracted bones demonstrated an increase in failure load (9.15% GRP I, 18.85% GRP II), increase in stiffness (31.28% GRP I, 53.21% GRP II), increases in areal and polar moments of inertia, and viability (6.21% GRP I, 13.02% GRP II). Our results suggest that DO can be modeled successfully with an organ culture, and continued use of this system will help to gain insight into the mechanisms and pathways by which distraction osteogenesis occurs.
|
Page generated in 0.0952 seconds