Spelling suggestions: "subject:"rule"" "subject:"mule""
31 |
SEXUAL SEGREGATION BY DESERT MULE DEER (ARIZONA)Scarbrough, David Lyle January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
32 |
Kaibab mule deer productivity estimates based on ovarian examinationPregler, Charles E., 1951- January 1974 (has links)
No description available.
|
33 |
Prey use by male and female cougars in an elk and mule deer communityWhite, Kevin Robert. January 2009 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S. in natural resource sciences)--Washington State University, May 2009. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on May 21, 2009). "Department of Natural Resource Sciences." Includes bibliographical references (p. 19-24).
|
34 |
Effects of reproductive status of mountain lions on prey selection of mule deer and white-tailed deer in northeastern WashingtonKeehner, Jonathan R., January 2009 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S. in natural resource sciences)--Washington State University, August 2009. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on July 21, 2009). "Department of Natural Resource Sciences." Includes bibliographical references (p. 18-21).
|
35 |
Analysis of mountain lion predation upon mule deer and elk in the Idaho Primitive areaHornocker, Maurice Gail January 1967 (has links)
This study was designed (1) to investigate the dynamics of a mountain lion population, and (2) to assess the impact of a population of lions on populations of big-game animals. The research was carried on in the Idaho Primitive area; intensive work was limited to the winter and early spring seasons.
Lion population numbers were stable during the three-year study period, and available evidence indicates the present population
level existed for some time prior to the start of the study-Intraspecific relationships, manifested through territoriality, acted to limit lion numbers and maintain population stability. Dispersal and mortality, particularly of young individuals, appeared to be important limiting mechanisms.
The population was centered around a nucleus of mature individuals well-established on territories, but segments of the population were dynamic, exhibiting an inflow and outflow of individuals from season to season. These transients were composed predominantly of young animals.
Strife appeared to be kept to a minimum by a "mutual avoidance" behavorial mechanism. Specific hunting territories were shared but appeared never to be used by more than one lion or family of lions at a time. Individuals, regardless of sex, appeared to respect the presence of another in a specific area. The "mutual avoidance" hypothesis is advanced as an important factor in the maintenance of lion populations. This mechanism provides for the distribution of lions in both space and time without costly-fighting. It also appears to insure greater success in securing large prey animals.
Population size of prey species -- mule deer, elk, and bighorn
sheep -- was established by making ground and aerial counts each year. Bighorn sheep numbers remained constant during the three-year period, but populations of deer and elk, the principal prey species, increased. The range was considered overstocked by deer and elk.
Forty-four elk and 39 deer were recorded as definitely killed by lions during the three-year period. Only two kills of bighorn sheep were found; lion predation on this species appeared insignificant.
Seventy-five percent of the elk killed by lions were 1% years old or less and 9% years or older; 57 percent of the deer kills were in these age classes. More "young" than "old" animals were killed. Lions were non-selective in their killing, except for "negative selectivity" in the case of mature bull elk. Factors acting separately or collectively to increase prey vulnerability included prey density, behavior, age, health, inter - and perhaps intraspecific strife, and the lion's predatory characteristics.
It was concluded that elk and deer populations were limited by the winter food supply and that predation by lions was inconsequential
in determining ultimate numbers of elk and deer. Lion predation, however, is a powerful force acting to dampen and protract severe prey oscillations and to distribute ungulates on restricted, critical range. From the theoretical standpoint, it also appears to be a strong evolutionary force, acting to remove less fit individuals from the population. The effects and influence of such predation are considered of great significance in the maintenance of ecologic stability in wilderness environments. / Science, Faculty of / Zoology, Department of / Graduate
|
36 |
An Analysis of a Measure of Productivity in Mule Deer PopulationsRyel, Ronald J. 01 May 1980 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the fall proportion of fawns among fawns and does in a mule deer population and two measures of productivity, the spring recruitment rate and the reproductive performance as measured in the fall. The spring recruitment rate was defined to be the number of fawns per doe which were recruited into the population at 1 year of age. The reproductive performance was defined to be the number of fawns produced per doe 2 years or older which survive to a specified time. The relationships between these quantities were measured by calculating linear coefficients of correlation from data generated by a projection matrix model of a mule deer population. A coefficient of correlation of 0.86 was found between the fall proportion of fawns and the rate at which fawns are recruited into the spring population. A coefficient of correlation of 0.89 was found between the fall proportion of fawns and the reproductive performance as measured in the fall.
The effect of misclassifying fawns as does and does as fawns on estimates of the proportion of fawns among fawns and does was also investigated. A comparison was made between the expected values of two estimates of the fall proportion, one with misclassification and one without misclassification. The misclassification of fawns and does was found to bias estimates of the proportion of fawns. The bias was found to be a function of the amount of misclassification and the actual proportion of fawns .
|
37 |
Determination of Digestibility of Lignin by Mule DeerTurner, Robert B. 01 May 1955 (has links)
The conflicting problem involving the herds of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) are of major interest throughout Utah. Individuals who are affected the most are sportsman, ranchers, fruit growers, sanitation engineers, home owners, federal administrators, and big game managers. Mainly, the problem arise as a result of insufficient forage, especially on the winter range. Here, factors such as increased deer numbers, decreased range productivity, severe winters, and expanded agricultural activity make more acute the problem of a naturally critical season.
|
38 |
Application of the carbon/nitrogen balance concept to predicting the nutritional quality of blueberry foliage to deer in southeastern AlaskaRose, Cathy L. 30 November 1989 (has links)
Sitka black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis Sm.) prefer understory forages growing beneath a forest canopy despite a greater abundance of the same plant species in forest clearings. This research examined
responses of the deciduous shrub - blueberry (Vaccinium ovalifolium), to test the hypotheses that 1) forage is less nutritious and less palatable when grown in clearings than in forest understories, and that 2) changes in the plant carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio in response to light and nitrogen supply determine forage nutritional quality.
Responses to irradiance and nitrogen supply were examined with respect to plant physiology, morphology, biochemistry and nutritional quality in three phases : 1) under controlled conditions in a growth room, 2) with manipulations in a field experiment and 3) along natural gradients of light and nitrogen in the native forests.
The results were highly consistent from the growth room to the field. Light strongly affected plant physiological responses, including photosynthesis, relative growth rates and growth efficiency, whereas nitrogen had little effect. In regression analyses, leaf morphological properties,
including specific leaf weight and leaf succulence, were the best predictors of relative growth rates (R2=.67). Irrespective of nitrogen supply, the biochemical properties of sun leaves included higher concentrations of starch, nonstructural carbohydrates and % lignin + cutin in the
cell wall, but lower concentrations of structural polymers, total nitrogen, free amino acids, and ratio of free amino acids : total N, compared to shade leaves. Sun leaves also were slightly higher in digestible energy, much lower in digestible nitrogen and presumably less palatable due to
higher tannin concentrations, compared to shade leaves. Tannins were directly correlated to specific leaf weight (R2=.89). Regression equations based upon specific leaf
weight, leaf succulence and leaf structural polymers accurately predicted field values for digestible nitrogen (R2=.91) and digestible energy (R2=.96) in foliage.
Nutritional properties of blueberry forage grown under variable irradiance in the natural stands matched predictions based upon results from the growth room and field. Compared to even-aged stands and oldgrowth, leaves of plants grown in clear-cuts were similar in digestible energy, much lower in digestible nitrogen, and presumably less palatable due to higher tannin concentrations. / Graduation date: 1990
|
39 |
Resource selection by white-tailed deer, mule deer, and elk in NebraskaBaasch, David M. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2008. / Title from title screen (site viewed Jan. 13, 2009). PDF text: xvii, 196 p. : ill. (some col.) ; 3 Mb. UMI publication number: AAT 3315313. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in microfilm and microfiche formats.
|
40 |
The effects of prescribed burning on deer and elk habitat parameters in Montana's Missouri River BreaksWood, Christopher Karl. January 2004 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S.)--Montana State University--Bozeman, 2004. / Typescript. Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Clayton B. Marlow. Includes bibliographical references (p. 49-53).
|
Page generated in 0.027 seconds