1 |
Natural Killer Cell Line Therapy in Multiple MyelomaSwift, Brenna 20 December 2011 (has links)
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy. NK cells have demonstrated anti-MM activity in allogeneic transplants and donor lymphocyte infusions, and may provide a more effective therapy for MM. This work demonstrates cytotoxicity of NK-92 and KHYG-1 against MM cells in chromium release and flow cytometry cytotoxicity assays. At a 10:1 effector to target ratio, the cytotoxicity of NK cell lines against MM cells is 50-90%. Blocking NKp30 significantly reduces the cytotoxicity of NK-92 and KHYG-1, while blocking NKG2D and DNAM-1 only reduces the cytotoxicity of NK-92. Notably, NK-92 and KHYG-1 have shown preferential cytotoxicity against the clonogenic population, killing 89-99% in a methylcellulose cytotoxicity assay. Preliminary results in a xenograft bioluminescent mouse model show that NK-92, but not KHYG-1, reduces the tumor burden detected by bioluminescence imaging and bone marrow engraftment by flow cytometry. Therefore, NK cell lines may offer a more effective therapy for MM.
|
2 |
Natural Killer Cell Line Therapy in Multiple MyelomaSwift, Brenna 20 December 2011 (has links)
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy. NK cells have demonstrated anti-MM activity in allogeneic transplants and donor lymphocyte infusions, and may provide a more effective therapy for MM. This work demonstrates cytotoxicity of NK-92 and KHYG-1 against MM cells in chromium release and flow cytometry cytotoxicity assays. At a 10:1 effector to target ratio, the cytotoxicity of NK cell lines against MM cells is 50-90%. Blocking NKp30 significantly reduces the cytotoxicity of NK-92 and KHYG-1, while blocking NKG2D and DNAM-1 only reduces the cytotoxicity of NK-92. Notably, NK-92 and KHYG-1 have shown preferential cytotoxicity against the clonogenic population, killing 89-99% in a methylcellulose cytotoxicity assay. Preliminary results in a xenograft bioluminescent mouse model show that NK-92, but not KHYG-1, reduces the tumor burden detected by bioluminescence imaging and bone marrow engraftment by flow cytometry. Therefore, NK cell lines may offer a more effective therapy for MM.
|
3 |
Natural Killer Cells for Therapy of LeukemiaSuck, Garnet, Linn, Yeh Ching, Tonn, Torsten 05 August 2020 (has links)
Clinical application of natural killer (NK) cells against leukemia is an area of intense investigation. In human leukocyte antigen-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT), alloreactive NK cells exert powerful anti-leukemic activity in preventing relapse in the absence of graft-versus-host disease, particularly in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Adoptive transfer of donor NK cells post-HSCT or in non-transplant scenarios may be superior to the currently widely used unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusion. This concept could be further improved through transfusion of activated NK cells. Significant progress has been made in good manufacturing practice (GMP)-compliant large-scale production of stimulated effectors. However, inherent limitations remain. These include differing yields and compositions of the end-product due to donor variability and inefficient means for cryopreservation. Moreover, the impact of the various novel activation strategies on NK cell biology and in vivo behavior are barely understood. In contrast, reproduction of the thirdparty NK-92 drug from a cryostored GMP-compliant master cell bank is straightforward and efficient. Safety for the application of this highly cytotoxic cell line was demonstrated in first clinical trials. This novel ‘off-theshelf’ product could become a treatment option for a broad patient population. For specific tumor targeting chimeric-antigen-receptor-engineered NK-92 cells have been designed.
|
4 |
Low Energy Electron Irradiation Is a Potent Alternative to Gamma Irradiation for the Inactivation of (CAR-)NK-92 Cells in ATMP ManufacturingWalcher, Lia, Kistenmacher, Ann-Kathrin, Sommer, Charline, Böhlen, Sebastian, Ziemann, Christina, Dehmel, Susann, Braun, Armin, Tretbar, Uta Sandy, Klöß, Stephan, Schambach, Axel, Morgan, Michael, Löffler, Dennis, Kämpf, Christoph, Blumert, Conny, Reiche, Kristin, Beckmann, Jana, König, Ulla, Standfest, Bastian, Thoma, Martin, Makert, Gustavo R., Ulbert, Sebastian, Kossatz-Böhlert, Uta, Köhl, Ulrike, Dünkel, Anna, Fricke, Stephan 24 March 2023 (has links)
Background: With increasing clinical use of NK-92 cells and their CAR-modified
derivatives in cancer immunotherapy, there is a growing demand for efficient
production processes of these “off-the-shelf” therapeutics. In order to ensure safety
and prevent the occurrence of secondary tumors, (CAR-)NK-92 cell proliferation has to be
inactivated before transfusion. This is commonly achieved by gamma irradiation. Recently,
we showed proof of concept that low energy electron irradiation (LEEI) is a new method for
NK-92 inactivation. LEEI has several advantages over gamma irradiation, including a faster
reaction time, a more reproducible dose rate and much less requirements on radiation
shielding. Here, LEEI was further evaluated as a promising alternative to gamma irradiation
yielding cells with highly maintained cytotoxic effector function.
Methods: Effectiveness and efficiency of LEEI and gamma irradiation were analyzed using
NK-92 and CD123-directed CAR-NK-92 cells. LEE-irradiated cells were extensively
characterized and compared to gamma-irradiated cells via flow cytometry, cytotoxicity
assays, and comet assays, amongst others.
Results: Our results show that both irradiation methods caused a progressive decrease
in cell viability and are, therefore, suitable for inhibition of cell proliferation. Notably, the NKmediated
specific lysis of tumor cells was maintained at stable levels for three days postirradiation,
with a trend towards higher activities after LEEI treatment as compared to
gamma irradiation. Both gamma irradiation as well as LEEI led to substantial DNA damage
and an accumulation of irradiated cells in the G2/M cell cycle phases. In addition,
transcriptomic analysis of irradiated cells revealed approximately 12-fold more
differentially expressed genes two hours after gamma irradiation, compared to LEEI.
Analysis of surface molecules revealed an irradiation-induced decrease in surface
expression of CD56, but no changes in the levels of the activating receptors NKp46,
NKG2D, or NKp30.
Conclusions: The presented data show that LEEI inactivates (CAR-)NK-92 cells as
efficiently as gamma irradiation, but with less impact on the overall gene expression. Due
to logistic advantages, LEEI might provide a superior alternative for the manufacture of
(CAR-)NK-92 cells for clinical application.
|
Page generated in 0.0183 seconds