Background: There are few studies on the uptake of non-invasive prenatal screening, but those available suggest substantial variation in uptake in the initial years in which it was offered. There is a need to update the earlier evidence and determine whether there has been any change in usage trends as the number of users have increased. This will help inform policy makers about NIPT uptake under currently existing policies and guidelines which can help inform whether to maintain or refine policies on NIPT. Objectives: The primary objective of this thesis was to investigate recent trends in NIPT utilization, and the secondary objective was to identify differences between pregnant individuals aged 40 years and above and/or with a history of previous aneuploidy who opted for first-tier (first-line screening) or second-tier (contingent screening) NIPT and pregnant individuals aged less than 40 years with no history of previous aneuploidy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a province wide birth registry from Ontario and the population studied comprised pregnant individuals with an expected date of delivery from August 1st, 2016 to March 31st, 2020. Results: Of 536,748 pregnant individuals resident in Ontario during the study period, 27,733 were classified as high-risk of giving birth to a baby with a chromosomal aneuploidy and 509,015 were classified as low-risk of giving birth to a baby with a chromosomal aneuploidy. Uptake of NIPT has increased every year since 2016. We found substantial variation in NIPT between regions within the province. Highest uptake was found in urban areas, highest neighbourhood of income and education quintiles, high-risk population, among those with a prenatal care visit in the first trimester, multiple pregnancy, multigravidity, body mass index within the normal range (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), and OHIP funding. Conclusion: Our results suggest a need to provide more education/training about NIPT and funding eligibility to health professionals and pregnant individuals, including low-risk pregnant individuals in the first-tier (first-line screening) NIPT funding policy, to ensure equitable assess.

La place du Dépistage Prénatal Non Invasif (DPNI) n’est pas encore clairement définie dans le dépistage prénatal de la trisomie 21 en France. Nos objectifs étaient d’évaluer la compréhension, les connaissances, et l’attitude de professionnels de santé et de patientes concernant le DPNI.Une étude prospective multicentrique par questionnaire auprès de patientes enceintes et de professionnels de santé a été menée dans différents hôpitaux français entre février 2014 et juillet 2015.Sur les 260 questionnaires recueillis chez les professionnels, le score moyen de connaissances était 5,38±2,83(sur 10)et 92,7%(n=241) avaient une attitude favorable face au DPNI. En analyse multivariée, les facteurs associés à un bon niveau de connaissances étaient la profession de gynécologue ou de conseiller en génétique, l’âge<30 ans, le fait de travailler à l’hôpital ou en cabinet et le fait de suivre>50 grossesses par an.Sur les 380 questionnaires de patientes, le score moyen de connaissances était faible 2,20±1,88(sur 10) et 89,9%(n=328) avaient une attitude favorable face au DPNI. En analyse multivariée, les facteurs associés à un bon niveau de connaissances chez les patientes étaient l’âge maternel et le fait de consulter en secteur privé.Le niveau de connaissances des professionnels et des patientes sur le DPNI est faible. La plupart des patientes ne peuvent pas formuler de consentement éclairé. Toutefois, la plupart des professionnels et des patientes sont très en faveur de ce test. La généralisation du DPNI dans le dépistage de la trisomie 21 implique un important programme de formation des professionnels afin qu'ils délivrent une information prénatale de qualité et non directive. / The place of Non Invasive Prenatal Testing(NIPT) is not clearly established for prenatal screening for Down syndrome in France. Our objectives were to assess the understanding, knowledge of, and attitudes towards NIPT in French patients and healthcare providers.A prospective multicenter study was performed in several French hospital centers between February 2014 and July 2015. A survey was administered to pregnant patients and to healthcare professionals.A total of 260 questionnaires were completed by healthcare providers. The average knowledge score was 5,38±2,83(out of a possible 10). In multivariate analysis, the characteristics associated with satisfactory knowledge were: profession as obstetrician or genetic counsellor, age<30 years, working in hospital or in doctor’s office, more than 50 pregnancies followed per year. Among professionals, 92,7%n=241) had a favorable attitude towards NIPT.We collected 380 questionnaires from pregnant women. The average knowledge score was very low: 2,20±1,88(out of 10). In multivariate analysis, the two significant characteristics associated with satisfactory knowledge was maternal age and having prenatal care in private practice. Among patients, 89,9%(n=328) had a favorable attitude towards NIPT.The level of knowledge of NIPT of healthcare professionals and patients is low. Many patients can not provide informed consent. However most professionals and patients are in favor of the use of this test. The input of NIPT in prenatal screening for trisomy 21 requires a considerable teaching program for healthcare providers so they can give balanced pretest information and non-directive counselling.

Prenatal assessment of fetal health is routinely offered throughout pregnancy to ensure that the most effective management can be provided to maintain fetal and maternal well-being. Currently, invasive testing is used for definitive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy, which is associated with a 1% risk of iatrogenic fetal loss. Developing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a key area of research and methods to increase the level of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) within the maternal circulation have been discussed to improve accuracy of such tests. In this study, three strategies; co-amplification at lower denaturation temperature polymerase chain reaction (COLD-PCR), inverse-PCR and Pippin Prep™ gel electrophoresis, were analysed to identify a novel approach to selectively enrich shorter cffDNA fragments from larger maternal cell-free DNA (cfDNA). The sensitivity of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) against real-time PCR (qPCR) was compared for fetal sex and RHD genotyping. In addition RHD zygosity testing was carried out for non-maternal samples. Consequently, Pippin Prep™ gel electrophoresis was combined with ddPCR analysis for the NIPD of Down Syndrome (DS) in pseudo-maternal samples. The results revealed that the Pippin Prep™ gel electrophoresis enrichment approach successfully demonstrated 2-fold to 5-fold increases in the cffDNA fraction. However, further optimisation assays of COLD-PCR and inverse-PCR using actual maternal samples were required. The spike experiments for DS detection revealed that with the present assay IV overrepresentation of the chromosome 21 target could be significantly detected for samples with ≥15% ‘cffDNA fraction’. In conjunction with the Pippin Prep™ enrichment method, this would have enabled assessment of all 10 maternal samples. Alternatively, fetal sex and RHD genotyping results determined that ddPCR provides a more sensitive platform compared to qPCR approaches, particularly for samples that express low cffDNA fractions (<2%). The ddPCR platform also proved to be a rapid and accurate system for the determination of RHD zygosity. This study highlights that ddPCR could be used as opposed to qPCR for accurate determination of fetal sex and RHD status. While sequencing approaches currently provide the most sensitive platforms for NIPT of fetal aneuploidy, high costs (>£400) prevent universal application. The combination of cffDNA enrichment with ddPCR analysis could provide a cheaper and more widely available platform for NIPD. However, further large scale validation studies using actual maternal samples are required.