Accumulations of fine sediments in deep-ocean contourites form a sedimentary record that has been hypothesized to be directly related to bottom-current behavior. This is known as the 'sortable silt' hypothesis and states that the non-cohesive, coarse silt in the 10 to 63 µm size range within a deposit can be used as a proxy for paleocurrent velocity. Slow deposition rates on contourites (2−10 cm/kyr) make it difficult to test this hypothesis in the field and few laboratory studies have been conducted. To test the 'sortable silt' hypothesis in the laboratory, a non-recirculating flume was constructed in which silt and clay could be deposited under a variety of velocities, sediment concentrations, and silt to clay ratios. Samples of the deposited material from each experiment were analyzed to determine the grain-size distribution using a Micromeritics Sedigraph 5120 particle size analyzer. The results of these experiments were used to evaluate the following two hypotheses: 1. The proportion of sortable silt (SS%) compared to the proportion of clay is a better indicator of current velocity than the mean size of the sortable silt (SS). 2. The presence of clay will impact the movement and sorting of silt in the bed. Results show that increased velocity correlates with increased (SS), and that (SS) generally decreases downstream of the sediment source. (SS) was found to be more representative of velocity than (SS%) and, counter to the original hypothesis, clay did not have a significant effect on silt deposition. / Master of Science / The ’sortable silt’ hypothesis states that there is a relationship between the velocity of an ocean current and the size of the sediment that deposits on the bottom of the ocean. These deep-ocean deposits consist of material smaller than sand such as clay and silt. Smaller particles require less force than larger particles to remain suspended, and higher current velocities produce larger forces. For this reason larger current velocities are thought to be associated with the deposition of coarser sediments. It is challenging to test this hypothesis in the field because of the cost and the slow rates at which change occurs. Laboratory studies can help to overcome these challenged by test scenarios otherwise impossible in the field. For this research, a flume was constructed and used to examine how different sediment types sort under flowing water. Most laboratory flumes recirculate water using pumps, but this flume does not. A mixture of dry material and water flows through the flume, depositing a bed over time. This deposited material can then be tested for its size parameters. These size parameters are compared to the material type and the velocity of the current in the flume to help answer two main questions: 1. Is the amount of silt in a sample a better indication of the current velocity than the average size of the material deposited? 2. Will the addition of clay will change the way silt deposits in the system?. Results show that silt does sort with increasing velocity and that the mean sortable silt size is good indicator of current velocity.

This study is the first to consider how the combination of root physical effects, microbial production of EPS, and root effects on the hydrodynamic boundary layer could influence streambank soil erodibility. Specifically, the goal of this research was to quantify the physical and biological effects of roots on streambank fluvial erosion. A series of laboratory-scale erosion tests were conducted using a mini jet erosion testing device and a recirculating flume channel to address this goal. Several soil and vegetation factors that influence fluvial entrainment, like extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), soil aggregate stability and root length density, were measured following erosion testing. For flume experiments, three streambank boundary conditions were constructed to simulate unvegetated streambanks, as well as streambanks with herbaceous and woody roots. Soil treatments were also created to represent unamended and organic matter (OM) amended soil either without roots (bare soil), with synthetic roots, or with living roots (Panicum virgatum). Median soil erosion rates along the simulated rooted boundaries were two to ten times higher compared to the unvegetated boundary due to protruding root impacts on the boundary layer. In flume experiments, median erosion rates were 30% to 72% lower for unamended soils containing compacted synthetic root fibers as compared to bare soil samples. Adding both OM and fibers to the soil had a greater effect; the median erosion rate reductions of live rooted treatments (95% to 100%) and synthetic rooted + OM treatments (86% to 100%) were similar and statistically lower than bare soil controls. Stimulated microbial production of EPS proteins were significantly correlated with increased erosion resistance in OM-amended treatments while OM treatments had significantly lower EPS carbohydrates compared to unamended treatments. In summary, while sparsely spaced roots exposed on streambanks may increase soil erosion rates due to impacts on the hydrodynamic boundary layer, overall results highlight how the synergistic relationship between root fibers and soil microbes can significantly reduce streambank soil erodibility due to fiber reinforcement and EPS production. / Doctor of Philosophy / Plant roots are known to protect streambank soils from erosion by water; however, exactly how roots provide this protection has remained unclear. Among other things, roots can influence streambank soil erosion by holding soil together through a thick root network, interacting with soil microorganisms to stimulate the release of "sticky" organic compounds called extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), and altering the force of the water against the streambank. This research aimed to quantify and compare the relative importance of these three mechanisms on streambank soil erosion using a mini jet erosion testing device and an indoor recirculating flume channel. To do this in the flume, three walls were constructed to simulate unvegetated streambanks, as well as streambanks with herbaceous and woody roots. In greenhouse settings, soil treatments were also created to represent unamended and organic matter (OM) amended soil either without roots (bare soil), with artificial roots, or with living roots (Panicum virgatum). While roots protruding out of streambanks appeared to increase median soil erosion rates due to the impact of roots on near-bank flow, artificial roots in the soil and OM amended soils reduced soil erosion rates. Specifically, OM amendments stimulated the production of EPS proteins, leading to improved soil stability and increased soil resistance to erosion by water. Overall results highlight how the synergistic relationship between root fibers (living roots and artificial roots) and soil microbes can significantly reduce streambank soil erodibility due to root binding and microbial production of EPS. While plant roots naturally provide both fibers and EPS to soils, these materials could be incorporated into fill soils during construction to rapidly increase soil erosion resistance following levee construction and stream restoration projects.