Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-08-01T13:50:41Z No. of bitstreams: 1 YgorWernerDeOliveira_DISSERT.pdf: 1558064 bytes, checksum: de77d18fbf983d33b79cff0b6da5ee2f (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-08-07T14:35:51Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 YgorWernerDeOliveira_DISSERT.pdf: 1558064 bytes, checksum: de77d18fbf983d33b79cff0b6da5ee2f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-07T14:35:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 YgorWernerDeOliveira_DISSERT.pdf: 1558064 bytes, checksum: de77d18fbf983d33b79cff0b6da5ee2f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-10-31 / O conceito de fam?lia, atribu?do ao longo do s?culo XX, sofreu profundas mudan?as de fun??o, natureza, composi??o e, consequentemente, de concep??o, sobretudo ap?s o advento do Estado Social. A moldura de fam?lia patriarcal, tradicionalista, formada exclusivamente pela uni?o entre homem e mulher, que as legisla??es brasileiras tomaram como par?metro desde a Col?nia, entrou em crise, culminando com sua derrocada, no plano jur?dico, pelos valores introduzidos a partir da Constitui??o de 1988, a qual incorporou as mudan?as dos valores e costumes socioculturais que afloraram na sociedade p?s-moderna brasileira. N?o obstante o aprimoramento de car?ter jur?dico e, tamb?m, do vi?s ideol?gico e compromiss?rio que passou a ser conferido ? tutela constitucional edificada em torno da dignidade da pessoa humana, fato ? que o ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro n?o regula expressamente os efeitos jur?dicos decorrentes das rela??es afetivas havidas, de forma duradoura, entre pessoas do mesmo sexo. O objetivo geral desta disserta??o ? investigar, cientificamente, a evid?ncia da tutela constitucional das rela??es homoafetivas, lan?ando bases, com apoio em diretrizes hermen?uticas, sobre as normas que asseguram o sustent?culo jur?dico para o reconhecimento das uni?es entre pessoas do mesmo sexo na condi??o de entidades familiares constitucionalmente protegidas. Para tanto, no escopo de solucionar as problem?ticas suscitadas ao longo da investiga??o, a pesquisa se utiliza de uma hermen?utica capaz de conferir for?a normativa aos princ?pios constitucionais impl?citos e expl?citos, dentre estes o da liberdade, dignidade da pessoa humana, igualdade, afetividade, solidariedade, bem como o da proibi??o da discrimina??o de qualquer natureza, como meio de promover o reconhecimento da tutela jur?dica aplic?vel ?s rela??es homoafetivas. Em conson?ncia com esta abordagem, analisa tamb?m as decis?es proferidas pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), em sede de controle abstrato de constitucionalidade, que reconheceram a uni?o homoafetiva como entidade familiar, o que restou consagrado no ?mbito da ADI n. 4277 e da ADPF n. 132. A investiga??o aponta que omiss?o legislativa ? motivo de inseguran?a jur?dica, sobretudo quando a homossexualidade ? discriminada e tratada com repulsa por alguns segmentos sociais, e conclui, a partir da leg?tima atua??o da jurisdi??o constitucional, pela conformidade legal e pertin?ncia jur?dica da autoaplicabilidade do casamento civil homoafetivo, demonstrando que tais decis?es foram o divisor de ?guas para a consolida??o de conquistas em prol dos homossexuais, inaugurando-se, desde ent?o ? em car?ter vinculante e com efic?cia erga omnes ? a eleva??o da uni?o cont?nua, p?blica e duradoura, entre pessoas do mesmo sexo, ao patamar de entidade familiar constitucionalmente protegida. / The concept of family, attributed throughout the twentieth century, has undergone profound changes function, nature, composition and, consequently, the design, especially after the advent of the welfare state. The patriarchal family frame traditionalist, formed exclusively by the union between man and woman, that Brazilian legislation taken as a parameter from Cologne, was in crisis, culminating in his downfall, in legal terms, by the values entered from the Constitution of 1988, which incorporated the changes of values and socio-cultural customs that surfaced in the brazilian post-modern society. Despite the legal character of improvement and also the ideological bias and price undertaking now being given to the constitutional protection built around the dignity of the human person, the fact is that brazilian law does not expressly cover the legal effects of affective relationships, lastingly, between persons of the same sex. The overall objective of this dissertation is to investigate scientifically the evidence of the constitutional protection of same-sex relations, laying the foundation, with support hermeneutical guidelines on standards that ensure the legal bulwark for the recognition of marriages between persons of the same sex on condition of entities constitutionally protected family. Therefore, the scope to address the issues raised during the investigation, the research uses a hermeneutic able to give legal force to the implicit and explicit constitutional principles, among them the freedom, human dignity, equality, affection, solidarity and the prohibition of discrimination of any kind as a means of promoting the recognition of legal protection applicable to same-sex relations. And in line with this approach, also examines the decision of the Supreme Court in the seat of abstract control of constitutionality, which recognized the homosexual union as a family entity, which remains enshrined within the ADI n. 4277 and ADPF n. 132. Research indicates that legislative omission is a cause of legal uncertainty, especially when homosexuality is discriminated against and treated with disgust by some social segments, and concludes from the legitimate action of the constitutional jurisdiction for legal compliance and legal relevance of the applicability same-sex civil marriage and stable conversion into marriage against homosexuals, demonstrating that such decisions were the watershed for the consolidation of achievements in favor of homosexuals, is inaugurating since then - in binding character and for all effectiveness - high continuous, public and lasting union between persons of the same sex, the family unit level of constitutionally protected.