Thesis (M.A.)--Ohio University, March, 2008. / Title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references.

L’organisation de la direction des personnes morales de droit privé, et en particulier des sociétés, est le siège d’un pouvoir distinct du pouvoir de direction de l’employeur : le pouvoir d’organisation. Proposé pour l’analyse du droit positif, ce pouvoir désigne le pouvoir d’organiser la direction des personnes morales telles que les sociétés. Cette catégorie d’analyse permet de rendre compte de certaines transformations affectant les règles du droit du travail, en particulier lorsque celles-ci sont au contact des règles du droit des sociétés. L’on pourrait penser que les règles du droit du travail ne visent pas la direction des sociétés. Pourtant, l’exploration s’avère fructueuse. Considéré par le droit du travail, le pouvoir d’organisation participe de la recomposition de la figure de l’employeur et du redécoupage de l’organisation. S’il permet de rendre compte de certaines évolutions du droit positif, le pouvoir d’organisation permet aussi d’ordonner un régime, composé des règles qui l’instituent. Ainsi, les prérogatives, constitutives du pouvoir d’organisation résultent d’une part des règles qui définissent la "constitution" de la personne morale employeur et d’autre part des règles qui permettent de recomposer les liens tissés entre les personnes morales. La quête du régime du pouvoir d’organisation permet de mettre en lumière l’existence d’un droit de l’organisation de la direction des sociétés. La découverte du pouvoir d’organisation invite aussi à renouveler l’analyse des mécanismes d’imputation des responsabilités, traditionnellement rabattus sur le seul employeur. / The management organization of private law legal entities, and in particular companies, is the fundament of a distinct power of the employer’s management power: the power of organization. Proposed for the analysis of positive law, this power is to organize the management of legal persons such as corporations. This category of analysis can account for certain changes affecting the rules of labor law, especially when these encounter the rules of corporate law. One might think that the rules of labor law do not apply to corporate management. However, the exploration is successful. Considered by labor law, the power of organization participates in the reconstruction of the employer and the redistribution of the organization. The power of organization enables to account some changes in positive law. It allows to plan a system consisting of its own set of rules. Thereby, the prerogatives of the power of organization result, on one hand from rules that set the "constitution" of the corporation employer and on the other hand rules that allow to rebuild the links between the entities. The quest for the organization power system enables to enlighten the existence of a group of rules, a set of rules to organize the management of the companies that configures in the same time labor and corporate relations. Coming back to the lost organization power between labor law and corporate law cannot only create a system. The discovery of the power of organization also calls for new analysis of the mechanisms for the imputation of responsibilities traditionally held by the employer.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2006. / Document formatted into pages; contains viii, 186 p. Includes bibliographical references.

La ricerca prende avvio dalla ricostruzione dei processi socio-economici che hanno portato alla crisi del modo di produzione taylorista-fordista. Muovendo da tali riflessioni, si constata come le imprese “post-fordiste” si avvalgano in misura crescente di lavoratori autonomi, un tempo coordinati e continuativi e, oggi, a progetto (artt. 61 e ss., d.lgs. 276/2003). Tali collaboratori sono, dunque, soggetti ad un potere (contrattuale) di coordinamento del committente che, alle volte, si somma ad una condizione di dipendenza economica dal committente medesimo. Si crea, quindi, una differenziazione interna all'area dell'autonomia coordinata che non pare adeguatamente valorizzata dal legislatore ordinario, ma che sembra interessare i sindacati. Il dato reale vede, infatti, agire rappresentanze varie, sicché occorre circoscrivere l'ambito di applicabilità degli artt. 39 e 40 Cost. L'assenza di un genuino interesse collettivo e di un'effettiva attività di autotutela inducono a ritenere che i collaboratori “forti” e il relativo associazionismo possano beneficiare delle sole tutele poste dagli artt. 2, 18 e 41 Cost. A conclusione si affrontano le problematiche che la ricostruzione così svolta solleva, ovverosia come garantire l'effettività delle tutele riconosciute al sindacalismo dei collaboratori “deboli” e come contemperare l'associazionismo dei collaboratori “forti” con il diritto antitrust comunitario. / The search starts with the reconstruction of socio-economic processes. Moving from these reflections, it's possible to see that today's companies take advantage of increasingly self-employed coordinated and continuous and, after d.lgs. 276/2003 “lavoratori a progetto”. These employees are, therefore, subject to a power (contractual) coordination of the customer that, at times, it adds up to a state of economic dependence by the same. It then creates an internal differentiation into autonomy area that does not seem properly valued by the ordinary legislator, but that seems to involve trade unions. Given that in reality there are different representations, we move to circumscribe the scope of applicability of the Arts. 39 and 40 Const. The absence of a genuine interest and genuine self activities suggest that employees "strong" and its associations can only benefit from the protections posed by Arts. 2, 18 and 41 Const. At the end tackling the problems so that the reconstruction turn raises, namely how to ensure the effectiveness of the safeguards recognized unionism collaborators "weak" and reconcile the associations of employees "strong" with the antitrust law.