Master of Science / Department of Animal Sciences and Industry / Jeffrey S. Stevenson / Lactating dairy cows from 2 Kansas farms were used to determine the effectiveness of exogenous progesterone in the form of an intravaginal insert (controlled internal drug release; CIDR) in conjunction with an ovulation-synchronization protocol. Cows were enrolled in a Presynch + Ovsynch protocol after parturition, where they received 2 injections of PGF[subscript]2[alpha], 14 d apart (Presynch) beginning between 30 and 36 DIM. Cows (n = 155) detected in estrus after the second PGF[subscript]2[alpha] injection of Presynch were inseminated (early AI). Remaining cows were assigned randomly to be treated with the Cosynch-72 protocol (GnRH 12 d after last Presynch PGF[subscript]2[alpha] injection, PGF[subscript]2[alpha] 7 d after GnRH, and timed AI + GnRH injection 72 h later) and served as controls (n = 159), or to be treated with the Cosynch-72 protocol and receive a progesterone insert (Ovsynch + CIDR; n = 175) for 7 d between GnRH and PGF[subscript]2[alpha]. Blood was collected at d −22 and −10 (relative to TAI at d 0) to determine cycling status based on progesterone concentrations and again at d 11 post AI to determine luteal competency. Treated cows were assigned body condition scores (BCS) on d −22 and −10. Pregnancy status was confirmed by palpation of the uterus per rectum and its contents on d 38 post-timed AI and verified again 4 wk later. Treatment with the progesterone insert increased timed AI pregnancies per AI in Cosynch- 72 + CIDR-treated cows when compared with controls (38 vs. 24%), but did not differ from early AI cows (38%). Pregnancy loss was numerically less in progesterone-treated cows than in controls (4.4 vs. 11.8%). Our study shows that increased pregnancies per AI can be achieved by the use of a progesterone insert in a reduced population of cows not yet inseminated, but treated with a progesterone insert.

Master of Science / Department of Animal Sciences and Industry / Jeffrey S. Stevenson / A study was performed to determine the minimum effective dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) needed to induce ovulation of follicles in cattle (Exp. 1). Another study determined the effects of replacing the first injection of GnRH (d -7) with hCG or saline in a Resynch-Ovsynch protocol [injection of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after PGF[subscript2alpha] before a resynchronized fixed-timed AI (TAI)] on pregnancy rates in cows diagnosed not pregnant and pregnancy survival in cows diagnosed pregnant (d 0; Exp. 2). A final study determined the ovulation potential of hCG compared with GnRH and saline (Exp. 3). In Exp. 1, ovaries of Holstein cows were mapped by using transrectal ultrasonography 7 d before pregnancy diagnosis. Cows were assigned to treatments of saline, 100 [Mu]g of GnRH, or 500, 1,000, 2,000, or 3,000 IU of hCG. Ovarian structures were monitored 7 d later and proportion of cows and follicles that ovulated were recorded. In Exp. 2, cows in 4 herds were assigned to treatments of 1,000 IU of hCG, 100 [Mu]g of GnRH, or left as untreated controls 7 d before pregnancy diagnosis. Nonpregnant cows were given PGF[subscript2alpha] (d 0), then inseminated 72 h later, concurrent with a GnRH injection. Pregnancy rates tended (P = 0.08) to be increased by GnRH (17.9%; n = 703) compared with control (12.9%; n = 505), but not hCG (16.5%; n = 541). Incidences of ovulation in nonpregnant cows (Exp. 3) were: hCG (51.6%; n = 126), GnRH (46.1%; n = 102), and control (28.1%; n = 96), whereas those in pregnant cows were: hCG (59.3%; n = 59), GnRH (24.5%; n = 49), and control (6.9%; n = 58). We concluded that: 1) a minimum dose of 1,000 IU of hCG resulted in a greater ovulatory response than saline, GnRH, or 500 IU of hCG (Exp. 1); 2) initiating a Resynch-Ovsynch protocol 7 d before pregnancy diagnosis with saline reduced timed AI pregnancy rates (Exp. 2); and 3) incidence of new CL was greater after hCG than GnRH in pregnant cows, but not in nonpregnant cows (Exp. 3).

O objetivo do experimento I foi avaliar a luteólise causada por três doses de PGF2&#945; (12,5; 25 e 50 mg de Dinoprost tometamina) nos dias 5 e 7 do ciclo estral. Foram utilizadas 339 vacas não lactantes da raça Nelore. Os animais foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com a apresentação do estro, recebendo a dose de PGF2&#945; nos dias 5 e 7 do ciclo estral. Cada grupo foi subdividido em três, que receberam os seguintes tratamentos de PGF2&#945; (12,5 mg; 25 mg; 50 mg). Através da concentração de P4 foram estimadas as taxas de regressão luteal 1 e 0,5 (1 - animais com concentração de P4 abaixo de 1 ng/mL; 0,5 animais com concentração de P4 abaixo de 0,5 ng/mL). Não houve interação entre a dose de PGF2&#945; e o dia do ciclo estral. A aplicação de PGF2&#945; no dia 7 do ciclo estral apresentou maior taxa de regressão luteal 1 e 0,5 quando comparada com o dia 5 do ciclo estral (1 - 76,9 vs 37,0 % - P = 0,0001; 0,5 - 57,5 vs 21,7 %, P = 0,0001, respectivamente). A taxa de regressão luteal 1 aumentou de acordo com a dose de PGF2&#945; administrada (12,5 mg 39,0 %; 25 mg 56,9 %; 50 mg 76,5 % P <0,0001). Quando a PGF2&#945; foi administrada no dia 5 do ciclo estral a concentração média de P4 segui o padrão de luteólise parcial e foi dependente da dose de PGF2&#945;. Quando a PGF2&#945; foi aplicada no dia 7 do ciclo estral a concentração média de P4 caiu drasticamente de 0 para 24 h e não voltou a se elevar em 48 h. A concentração de P4 em 48 h após a aplicação de PGF2&#945; foi menor na dose de 50 mg (0,51 ± 0,07 ng/mL). A taxa de luteólise foi menor no dia 5 do ciclo estral comparado com o dia 7 do ciclo estral. À medida que a dose de PGF2&#945; foi aumentada, a porcentagem de regressão luteal se elevou. O objetivo do experimento II foi avaliar se a substituição das aplicações do GnRH por BE, ECP e eCG no protocolos de 5 dias de P4 causa dupla ovulação e se a utilização de 1 ou 2 mg de BE no início do protocolo influencia na taxa de ovulação dupla. Foram utilizadas 85 multíparas da raça Nelore. No dia 0 do protocolo, as vacas receberam um implante de P4 e a dose de BE segundo o tratamento pertencente (tratamento A 1 mg de BE, tratamento B 2 mg de BE). Cinco dias após, o dispositivo foi retirado e aplicou-se PGF2&#945;, ECP eCG. Houve 5,9 % de dupla ovulação. O tratamento A causou menor porcentagem folículos maiores que 8 mm no dia 7 protocolo que o tratamento B (28,7 vs 50,6 P = 0,0460). Não houve diferença significativa na taxa de ovulação dupla, no diâmetro do folículo dominante no dia 5 e no dia 7 do protocolo e na taxa de crescimento folicular entre os tratamentos A e B. O protocolo de 5 dias de P4 com BE, ECP e eCG causou uma baixa taxa de dupla ovulação. O objetivo do experimento III foi comparar o aparecimento e a frequência de estro e a taxas de ovulação e gestação entre os protocolos de 5 dias de P4 + GnRH / GnRH e de 7 dias de P4 + BE / ECP + eCG em nulíparas, primíparas e multíparas. Foram utilizadas 411 fêmeas da raça Nelore (nulíparas - n = 198; primíparas - n = 80; multíparas - n = 133). No protocolo de 7 dias de P4, os animais receberam no dia 0 um implante de P4 e BE. No dia 7, o dispositivo foi retirado e aplicou-se PGF2&#945;, ECP e eCG. No protocolo de 5 dias de P4, os animais receberam no dia 0 o implante de P4 e GnRH. No dia 5, o dispositivo foi retirado e aplicaram-se 2 doses de PGF2&#945; com intervalo de 6 h entre as doses de PGF2. Os animais que não apresentaram estro até a hora da IA receberam 100 &#956;g de GnRH no momento da IA. A taxa de prenhez utilizando o protocolo de 5 ou 7 dias de P4 variou de acordo com a categoria da fêmea (nulíparas - 41,0 vs 51,0 % - P = 0.1608; primíparas 25,6 vs 31,7 % - P = 0,5513; multíparas - 58,4 vs 32,8 % - P = 0,0041, respectivamente). A taxa de apresentação de estro no protocolo de 7 dias de P4 foi maior para todas as categorias de fêmeas quando comparado com o protocolo de 5 dias deP4. (nulíparas 95,8 vs 66,0 % - P <0,0001; primíparas 48,7 vs 0 %; multíparas - 76,9 vs 13,4 % - P <0,0001, respectivamente). A resposta ao protocolo de 5 dias com GnRH foi pior nas multíparas. / The objective of the experiment I was to evaluate the luteolysis caused by three doses of PGF2&#945; (12.5, 25 and 50 mg of Dinoprost tometamina) when applied on the 5th and 7th days of the estrous cycle. Three hundred thirty-nine (339) nonlactating Nelore cows were used. The animals were divided into two groups according to the onset of estrus, and received the PGF2&#945; dose on the 5th or 7th day of the estrous cycle. Each group was divided into three subgroups, which were submitted to the treatments of PGF2&#945; with dose of 12.5 mg, 25 mg or 50 mg. Through the P4 concentration, the rates of 1 and 0.5 luteal regression were estimated (1 - animals with P4 concentration below 1 ng/mL and 0.5 - animals with P4 concentration below 0.5 ng/mL). There was no interaction between the PGF2&#945; dose and the day of the estrous cycle. The PGF2&#945; application on the 7th day of the estrous cycle had higher rates of the 1 and 0.5 luteal regression, when compared to the PGF2&#945; application on the 5th day of the estrous cycle (1 - 76.9 vs 37.0 % - P = 0.0001; 0,5 - 57.5 vs 21.7 %, P = 0.0001, respectively). The rate of 1 luteal regression increased with the PGF2&#945; dose (12.5 mg - 39.0 %; 25 mg - 56.9 %; 50 mg - 76.5 %, P < 0.0001). The average concentrations of P4, when the PGF2&#945; was administered on the 5th day of the estrous cycle, follow the partial luteolysis standard that dependent on the PGF2&#945; dose. When the PGF2&#945; is applied on 7th day of the estrous cycle, the average concentration of P4 drops dramatically from 0 to 24 h and it do not rise again in 48 h. The P4 concentration is lower in the 50 mg (0.51 ± 0.07 ng/mL), 48 h after the PGF2&#945; application. The luteolysis rate was low on the 5th day of the estrous cycle. The luteal regression percentage increased with increase of the PGF2&#945; dose. The objective of the experiment II was to evaluate whether the replacement of the GnRH applications by BE, ECP and eCG in the 5-day protocols of P4 cause double ovulation and if the use of 1 or 2 mg of BE at the beginning of the protocol influences the double ovulation rate. Eighty-five (85) multiparous Nelore cows were used. On day 0 of the protocol, the cows received a P4 implant and a dose of BE that depending on the treatment to which the cows belong (Treatment A - 1 mg of BE, treatment B - 2 mg of BE). Five days later, the device was removed and the PGF2&#945;, ECP and eCG were applied. In the experiment II, there was 6.5 % of double ovulation. There was no significant difference in the double ovulation rate, dominant follicle diameter on the 5th and 7th day of the protocols, and follicular growth rate between the treatments A and B. The 5-day protocol of P4 with BE, eCG and ECP caused a low rate of the double ovulation, and there was no difference between 1 or 2 mg of BE to synchronize the follicular development wave. The objective of the experiment III was to compare the onset and frequency of estrus and the ovulation and pregnancy rates among the protocols of 5 days of P4 with GnRH and 7 days of P4 with BE, ECP and eCG in nulliparous, primiparous and multiparous. Four hundred eleven (411) Nellore females were used (nulliparous - n = 198; primiparous - n = 80; multiparous - n = 133). In 7-day protocol of P4, the animals received an implant of P4 and BE on day 0. On day 7, the device was removed and the PGF2&#945;, ECP and eCG were applied in the cows. In 5-day protocol of P4, the animals received implants of GnRH and P4 on the day 0. On day 5, the device was removed and two doses of PGF2&#945; were applied with interval of 6 h. The animals that did not show estrus until the AI time received 100 mg of GnRH at this moment. The pregnancy rate varied according to the female category in both protocols (nulliparous - 41.0 vs 51.0 % - P = 0.1608; primiparous - 25.6 vs 31.7 % - P = 0.5513; multiparous - 58.4 vs 32.8 % - P = 0.0041, respectively). The rate estrus onset in the 5-day protocol of P4 with GnRH was lower for all female categories, when compared to the 7-day protocol (nulliparous - 95.8 vs 66.0 % - P <0.0001; primiparous 0 vs 48.7 %; multiparous - 76.9 vs 13.4 % - P <0.0001, respectively). The response in the 5-day protocol with GnRH was worse in multiparous cows.

O objetivo do experimento I foi avaliar a luteólise causada por três doses de PGF2&#945; (12,5; 25 e 50 mg de Dinoprost tometamina) nos dias 5 e 7 do ciclo estral. Foram utilizadas 339 vacas não lactantes da raça Nelore. Os animais foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com a apresentação do estro, recebendo a dose de PGF2&#945; nos dias 5 e 7 do ciclo estral. Cada grupo foi subdividido em três, que receberam os seguintes tratamentos de PGF2&#945; (12,5 mg; 25 mg; 50 mg). Através da concentração de P4 foram estimadas as taxas de regressão luteal 1 e 0,5 (1 - animais com concentração de P4 abaixo de 1 ng/mL; 0,5 animais com concentração de P4 abaixo de 0,5 ng/mL). Não houve interação entre a dose de PGF2&#945; e o dia do ciclo estral. A aplicação de PGF2&#945; no dia 7 do ciclo estral apresentou maior taxa de regressão luteal 1 e 0,5 quando comparada com o dia 5 do ciclo estral (1 - 76,9 vs 37,0 % - P = 0,0001; 0,5 - 57,5 vs 21,7 %, P = 0,0001, respectivamente). A taxa de regressão luteal 1 aumentou de acordo com a dose de PGF2&#945; administrada (12,5 mg 39,0 %; 25 mg 56,9 %; 50 mg 76,5 % P <0,0001). Quando a PGF2&#945; foi administrada no dia 5 do ciclo estral a concentração média de P4 segui o padrão de luteólise parcial e foi dependente da dose de PGF2&#945;. Quando a PGF2&#945; foi aplicada no dia 7 do ciclo estral a concentração média de P4 caiu drasticamente de 0 para 24 h e não voltou a se elevar em 48 h. A concentração de P4 em 48 h após a aplicação de PGF2&#945; foi menor na dose de 50 mg (0,51 ± 0,07 ng/mL). A taxa de luteólise foi menor no dia 5 do ciclo estral comparado com o dia 7 do ciclo estral. À medida que a dose de PGF2&#945; foi aumentada, a porcentagem de regressão luteal se elevou. O objetivo do experimento II foi avaliar se a substituição das aplicações do GnRH por BE, ECP e eCG no protocolos de 5 dias de P4 causa dupla ovulação e se a utilização de 1 ou 2 mg de BE no início do protocolo influencia na taxa de ovulação dupla. Foram utilizadas 85 multíparas da raça Nelore. No dia 0 do protocolo, as vacas receberam um implante de P4 e a dose de BE segundo o tratamento pertencente (tratamento A 1 mg de BE, tratamento B 2 mg de BE). Cinco dias após, o dispositivo foi retirado e aplicou-se PGF2&#945;, ECP eCG. Houve 5,9 % de dupla ovulação. O tratamento A causou menor porcentagem folículos maiores que 8 mm no dia 7 protocolo que o tratamento B (28,7 vs 50,6 P = 0,0460). Não houve diferença significativa na taxa de ovulação dupla, no diâmetro do folículo dominante no dia 5 e no dia 7 do protocolo e na taxa de crescimento folicular entre os tratamentos A e B. O protocolo de 5 dias de P4 com BE, ECP e eCG causou uma baixa taxa de dupla ovulação. O objetivo do experimento III foi comparar o aparecimento e a frequência de estro e a taxas de ovulação e gestação entre os protocolos de 5 dias de P4 + GnRH / GnRH e de 7 dias de P4 + BE / ECP + eCG em nulíparas, primíparas e multíparas. Foram utilizadas 411 fêmeas da raça Nelore (nulíparas - n = 198; primíparas - n = 80; multíparas - n = 133). No protocolo de 7 dias de P4, os animais receberam no dia 0 um implante de P4 e BE. No dia 7, o dispositivo foi retirado e aplicou-se PGF2&#945;, ECP e eCG. No protocolo de 5 dias de P4, os animais receberam no dia 0 o implante de P4 e GnRH. No dia 5, o dispositivo foi retirado e aplicaram-se 2 doses de PGF2&#945; com intervalo de 6 h entre as doses de PGF2. Os animais que não apresentaram estro até a hora da IA receberam 100 &#956;g de GnRH no momento da IA. A taxa de prenhez utilizando o protocolo de 5 ou 7 dias de P4 variou de acordo com a categoria da fêmea (nulíparas - 41,0 vs 51,0 % - P = 0.1608; primíparas 25,6 vs 31,7 % - P = 0,5513; multíparas - 58,4 vs 32,8 % - P = 0,0041, respectivamente). A taxa de apresentação de estro no protocolo de 7 dias de P4 foi maior para todas as categorias de fêmeas quando comparado com o protocolo de 5 dias deP4. (nulíparas 95,8 vs 66,0 % - P <0,0001; primíparas 48,7 vs 0 %; multíparas - 76,9 vs 13,4 % - P <0,0001, respectivamente). A resposta ao protocolo de 5 dias com GnRH foi pior nas multíparas. / The objective of the experiment I was to evaluate the luteolysis caused by three doses of PGF2&#945; (12.5, 25 and 50 mg of Dinoprost tometamina) when applied on the 5th and 7th days of the estrous cycle. Three hundred thirty-nine (339) nonlactating Nelore cows were used. The animals were divided into two groups according to the onset of estrus, and received the PGF2&#945; dose on the 5th or 7th day of the estrous cycle. Each group was divided into three subgroups, which were submitted to the treatments of PGF2&#945; with dose of 12.5 mg, 25 mg or 50 mg. Through the P4 concentration, the rates of 1 and 0.5 luteal regression were estimated (1 - animals with P4 concentration below 1 ng/mL and 0.5 - animals with P4 concentration below 0.5 ng/mL). There was no interaction between the PGF2&#945; dose and the day of the estrous cycle. The PGF2&#945; application on the 7th day of the estrous cycle had higher rates of the 1 and 0.5 luteal regression, when compared to the PGF2&#945; application on the 5th day of the estrous cycle (1 - 76.9 vs 37.0 % - P = 0.0001; 0,5 - 57.5 vs 21.7 %, P = 0.0001, respectively). The rate of 1 luteal regression increased with the PGF2&#945; dose (12.5 mg - 39.0 %; 25 mg - 56.9 %; 50 mg - 76.5 %, P < 0.0001). The average concentrations of P4, when the PGF2&#945; was administered on the 5th day of the estrous cycle, follow the partial luteolysis standard that dependent on the PGF2&#945; dose. When the PGF2&#945; is applied on 7th day of the estrous cycle, the average concentration of P4 drops dramatically from 0 to 24 h and it do not rise again in 48 h. The P4 concentration is lower in the 50 mg (0.51 ± 0.07 ng/mL), 48 h after the PGF2&#945; application. The luteolysis rate was low on the 5th day of the estrous cycle. The luteal regression percentage increased with increase of the PGF2&#945; dose. The objective of the experiment II was to evaluate whether the replacement of the GnRH applications by BE, ECP and eCG in the 5-day protocols of P4 cause double ovulation and if the use of 1 or 2 mg of BE at the beginning of the protocol influences the double ovulation rate. Eighty-five (85) multiparous Nelore cows were used. On day 0 of the protocol, the cows received a P4 implant and a dose of BE that depending on the treatment to which the cows belong (Treatment A - 1 mg of BE, treatment B - 2 mg of BE). Five days later, the device was removed and the PGF2&#945;, ECP and eCG were applied. In the experiment II, there was 6.5 % of double ovulation. There was no significant difference in the double ovulation rate, dominant follicle diameter on the 5th and 7th day of the protocols, and follicular growth rate between the treatments A and B. The 5-day protocol of P4 with BE, eCG and ECP caused a low rate of the double ovulation, and there was no difference between 1 or 2 mg of BE to synchronize the follicular development wave. The objective of the experiment III was to compare the onset and frequency of estrus and the ovulation and pregnancy rates among the protocols of 5 days of P4 with GnRH and 7 days of P4 with BE, ECP and eCG in nulliparous, primiparous and multiparous. Four hundred eleven (411) Nellore females were used (nulliparous - n = 198; primiparous - n = 80; multiparous - n = 133). In 7-day protocol of P4, the animals received an implant of P4 and BE on day 0. On day 7, the device was removed and the PGF2&#945;, ECP and eCG were applied in the cows. In 5-day protocol of P4, the animals received implants of GnRH and P4 on the day 0. On day 5, the device was removed and two doses of PGF2&#945; were applied with interval of 6 h. The animals that did not show estrus until the AI time received 100 mg of GnRH at this moment. The pregnancy rate varied according to the female category in both protocols (nulliparous - 41.0 vs 51.0 % - P = 0.1608; primiparous - 25.6 vs 31.7 % - P = 0.5513; multiparous - 58.4 vs 32.8 % - P = 0.0041, respectively). The rate estrus onset in the 5-day protocol of P4 with GnRH was lower for all female categories, when compared to the 7-day protocol (nulliparous - 95.8 vs 66.0 % - P <0.0001; primiparous 0 vs 48.7 %; multiparous - 76.9 vs 13.4 % - P <0.0001, respectively). The response in the 5-day protocol with GnRH was worse in multiparous cows.

MSCAGR / Department of Animal Science