The study sought to describe Mozambican women's experience of labour pain. The study sought to determine the manner in which labour pain is perceived and to determine the culturally acceptable behaviour of Mozambican women as they experience labour pain. The preferred pain relief measures and cultural practices and beliefs pertaining to labour pain by this cultural group were also studied. The major inferences drawn from this study are that during labour, Mozambican women mainly respond stoically to the experience of labour. They also exhibited different kinds of behaviour in response to labour pain, such as rubbing the painful site, tossing about in bed, and verbalisation. The implication of the study is that Swazi nurse-midwives should render culture congruent maternity care to the women during labour. / Health Studies / M.A. (Health Studies)

The need for nurses to become culturally competent is well documented in transcultural nursing literature. The subjective multidimensional nature of pain makes it imperative for nurses to use assessment methods that are culturally congruent. This study set out to explore the differences and similarities in conceptualization, experience, expression and management of pain between nurses and clients in the United Arab Emirates. The purpose of the study was to develop guidelines in the cultural pain assessment in the UAE context. The findings confirmed that nurses rely on biomedical approaches in assessment and relief of pain; clients were found to rely on the family for emotional support and on nurses for pharmacological interventions. Clients used sensory descriptors, and analogy when describing pain, nurses relied on the technical background and experience. Religious factors had a significant impact on clients' pain behavior. This study offers nurses new insights into cultural assessment of pain. / Health Studies / M. A. (Health Studies)

No description available.

The present study investigated the influence of a brief, intensive biofeedback-assisted imagery training regimen on psychological, physiological and neuroendocrinological measures of pain and stress in injury related chronic pain patients. The subjects were 36 patients (myelography examcandidates) who were assigned to the imagery or wait-list control group by order of referral presentation and to formulate equivalent groups.

Zhu, Fang. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2013. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 171-185). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts also in Chinese.

The undertreatment of chronic pain and the prevention of drug abuse and diversion of pain medications (i.e., opioids) have been identified as public health issues in the United States. In this domain, the Drug Enforcement Administration (D.E.A.) faces challenges when enforcing the Controlled Substance Act because it is tasked with regulating the dispensing of opioids by physicians in the treatment of chronic pain, while also attempting to prevent their abuse and diversion. Thus, the D.E.A. must use discretion in how it enforces the C.S.A. because intentional actions to prevent opioid abuse and diversion could also unintentionally affect the willingness of primary care physicians to prescribe them in the treatment of chronic pain. As an initial step in clarifying the boundaries between the D.E.A. and the medical profession, it was necessary to assess physician perceptions about the D.E.A. 's use of enforcement discretion. A total of 205 Oregon primary care physicians completed a web-based survey examining three domains: concern about D.E.A. enforcement discretion; autonomy related to use of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain; and prescribing of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain. Results indicated that some physicians perceive a concern about D.E.A. enforcement discretion, and those who have concern are more likely to perceive having reduced autonomy related to the use of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain. The results do not support previous research that showed that such concerns directly affects physician prescribing of opioids. Instead, results reveal that concern about D.E.A. enforcement discretion is associated with reduced perceived autonomy, and reduced perceived autonomy is associated with less willingness to prescribe opioids in the treatment of chronic pain. This research takes the study on this topic one step further in identifying physician perceptions about D.E.A. enforcement discretion, and how these perceptions were associated with physician autonomy and prescribing of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain. In doing so, this research provides important scholarly contributions to the enforcement discretion literature, specific to the D.E.A., and medical professionalism as it pertains to physician autonomy related to the use of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain.

<h1>Abstract</h1><p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is usually common patients who undergo high-dose treatment in combination with HSCT. Pain is usually associated with side effects as for example mucositis. The purpose of this study was to examine patients’ experiences of pain in relation to stemcellstransplantation. The purpose was also to examine how patients experience that they have been treated by the personnel regarding their pain, and also if the pain relief correspond to the patients expectations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study is a descriptive, longitudinal study. Eight patients who underwent HSCT were interviewed. The study implemented in three parts, whereof two interviews and one questionnaire. The interview material was analyzed by means of content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result shows that five of eight patients experienced pain during HSCT treatment. Three of these informants experienced pain in their mouth, their head and in their stomach. This is usually commonly side effects of the treatment. Back pain occurs in two of the patients and this pain hasn’t proceeded during the treatment.</p><p>Three informants did not experience any pain at all during the time of nursing. The result even shows that the all of the informants had experienced a well refutation of the personnel in terms of their pain. All informants reported that it was important to be well pain relieved. Those informants who had pain during their treatment were very satisfied with the pain relief they have got.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>stem cell transplantation, oral pain, pain treatment, oral mucositis, satisfaction with care.</p> / <p> </p><h1>Sammanfattning</h1><p><strong>Bakgrund och syfte: </strong>Smärta är vanligt förekommande bland patienter som genomgår högdosbehandling i kombination med HSCT. Smärta är vanligtvis förknippad med biverkningar som t ex mucosit. Syftet med denna studie var att undersöka patienters upplevelse av smärta i samband med stamcellstransplantation. Syftet är även att undersöka hur patienterna upplever att de blir bemötta av personalen angående sin smärta, samt om smärtlindringen motsvarar patientens förväntningar.</p><p><strong>Metod:</strong> Studien är en deskriptiv, longitudinell studie. Åtta patienter som skulle genomgå stamcellstransplantation intervjuades. Studien genomfördes i tre delar, varav två intervjuer och ett frågeformulär. Intervjumaterialet analyserades med innehållsanalys.</p><p><strong>Resultat:</strong> Resultatet visar att fem av åtta patienter upplevde smärta i samband med HSCT. Tre av dessa informanter upplevde smärtor i munnen, huvudet och i magen. Ryggsmärta förekom hos två av informanterna och denna smärta hade inte uppstått i samband med behandlingen. Tre informanter upplevde ingen smärta alls under hela vårdtiden. Resultatet visar även att samtliga informanter upplevt ett bra bemötande av personalen vad gäller deras smärta. Alla informanter uppgav att det var viktigt att vara bra smärtlindrad. De informanter som hade smärta under behandlingen var mycket nöjda med den smärtlindring de fick.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Nyckelord: </strong>stamcellstransplantation, oral smärta, smärtbehandling, oral mucosit, tillfredsställelse med vård.</p>

Not available

Abstract Background: Pain is usually common patients who undergo high-dose treatment in combination with HSCT. Pain is usually associated with side effects as for example mucositis. The purpose of this study was to examine patients’ experiences of pain in relation to stemcellstransplantation. The purpose was also to examine how patients experience that they have been treated by the personnel regarding their pain, and also if the pain relief correspond to the patients expectations. Method: The study is a descriptive, longitudinal study. Eight patients who underwent HSCT were interviewed. The study implemented in three parts, whereof two interviews and one questionnaire. The interview material was analyzed by means of content analysis. Results: The result shows that five of eight patients experienced pain during HSCT treatment. Three of these informants experienced pain in their mouth, their head and in their stomach. This is usually commonly side effects of the treatment. Back pain occurs in two of the patients and this pain hasn’t proceeded during the treatment. Three informants did not experience any pain at all during the time of nursing. The result even shows that the all of the informants had experienced a well refutation of the personnel in terms of their pain. All informants reported that it was important to be well pain relieved. Those informants who had pain during their treatment were very satisfied with the pain relief they have got.   Keywords: stem cell transplantation, oral pain, pain treatment, oral mucositis, satisfaction with care. / Sammanfattning Bakgrund och syfte: Smärta är vanligt förekommande bland patienter som genomgår högdosbehandling i kombination med HSCT. Smärta är vanligtvis förknippad med biverkningar som t ex mucosit. Syftet med denna studie var att undersöka patienters upplevelse av smärta i samband med stamcellstransplantation. Syftet är även att undersöka hur patienterna upplever att de blir bemötta av personalen angående sin smärta, samt om smärtlindringen motsvarar patientens förväntningar. Metod: Studien är en deskriptiv, longitudinell studie. Åtta patienter som skulle genomgå stamcellstransplantation intervjuades. Studien genomfördes i tre delar, varav två intervjuer och ett frågeformulär. Intervjumaterialet analyserades med innehållsanalys. Resultat: Resultatet visar att fem av åtta patienter upplevde smärta i samband med HSCT. Tre av dessa informanter upplevde smärtor i munnen, huvudet och i magen. Ryggsmärta förekom hos två av informanterna och denna smärta hade inte uppstått i samband med behandlingen. Tre informanter upplevde ingen smärta alls under hela vårdtiden. Resultatet visar även att samtliga informanter upplevt ett bra bemötande av personalen vad gäller deras smärta. Alla informanter uppgav att det var viktigt att vara bra smärtlindrad. De informanter som hade smärta under behandlingen var mycket nöjda med den smärtlindring de fick.   Nyckelord: stamcellstransplantation, oral smärta, smärtbehandling, oral mucosit, tillfredsställelse med vård.

This dissertation introduces a new problem in the delivery of healthcare, which could result in lower cost and a higher quality of medical care as compared to the current healthcare practice. In particular, a framework is developed for sedation and cardiopulmonary management for patients in the intensive care unit. A method is introduced to automatically detect pain and agitation in nonverbal patients, specifically in sedated patients in the intensive care unit, using their facial expressions. Furthermore, deterministic as well as probabilistic expert systems are developed to suggest the appropriate drug dose based on patient sedation level. This framework can be used to automatically control the level of sedation in the intensive care unit patients via a closed-loop control system. Specifically, video and other physiological variables of a patient can be constantly monitored by a computer and used as a feedback signal in a closed-loop control architecture. In addition, the expert system selects the appropriate drug dose based on the patient's sedation level. In clinical intensive care unit practice sedative/analgesic agents are titrated to achieve a specific level of sedation. The level of sedation is currently based on clinical scoring systems. In general, the goal of the clinician is to find the drug dose that maintains the patient at a sedation score corresponding to a moderately sedated state. This is typically done empirically, administering a drug dose that usually is in the effective range for most patients, observing the patient's response, and then adjusting the dose accordingly. However, the response of patients to any drug dose is a reflection of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drug and the specific patient. In this research, we use pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling to find an optimal drug dosing control policy to drive the patient to a desired sedation score.