Spelling suggestions: "subject:"parser"" "subject:"varser""
1 |
Implementierung eines Earley-ParsergeneratorsSchemainda, Christoph. January 1998 (has links)
Stuttgart, Univ., Fakultät Informatik, Studienarb., 1998.
|
2 |
Moderní implementace LALR(1) konstruktoru / A modern implementation of LALR(1) parser generatorFišer, Karel January 2013 (has links)
The goal of this thesis is to design and implement a modern parser generator. The result is a program that reads description of some context-free LALR(1) grammar and semantic actions from an input file. To output files the program generates source codes in several target modern object-oriented programming languages for implementation of the syntax analyzer which, when parsing the language corresponding to the given grammar, executes the given semantic actions. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
|
3 |
The wisent Parser GeneratorPreußer, Thomas 14 November 2012 (has links) (PDF)
Objective: This document is not an introduction to parser generators. Readers should rather have a good understanding of them, especially of LALR parser generators. This document merely describes the main aspects of the implementation of a LALR parser generator named wisent. It is divided into a concise description of the programming interface and an overview over the data structures and specifics of the implementation of the wisent parser generator.
|
4 |
Resource description framework parsing method on the UAS integration safety and security technology ontologyHarris, Hunter 10 May 2024 (has links) (PDF)
Ontological engineering utilizes ontologies for various purposes across the spectrum. Just as onotlogies are being used in healthcare, researchers are also developing ontologies for unmanned aerial systems (UAS). A specific ontology domain has been created laying out various aspects of counter unmanned aerial systems (cUAS), known as the “UAS Integration Safety and Security Technology Ontology” (ISSTO). Counter unmanned aerial systems are a collection of technologies and systems that detect, track, identify, and mitigate unmanned aerial systems. ISSTO represents a compilation of classes that encompass UAS and cUAS components. The classes within ISSTO include aircraft types, weather, sensors, UAS air traffic management, and the National Airspace System (NAS). To effectively utilize the ISSTO ontology, UAS pilots and or policymakers require an innovative parsing method to extract the specific information they seek. This methodology makes use of ontology querying and natural language processing methods. By using user input, SPARQL queries are built dynamically by the parsing method. It utilizes synonym expansion and a scoring mechanism that prioritizes results by relevance using label matches, class matches, and annotation keyword matches.
|
5 |
Semantic differences and Graphical View of FilesMohammed, Rafiullah Khan, Bandi, Raghavender January 2009 (has links)
This Master’s thesis presents an algorithm that finds the semantic differences between two versions of files, an older version and a new modified version of the file. The algorithm is responsible for finding changes in the program’s behavior and displaying them graphically. By this a lot of time can be saved because it is not necessary to go through the whole file to find the differences. The program, Semantic Diff, developed in this master thesis uses the Javacc parser generator which is used to parse files and generate the abstract syntax tree for them. Using this tree it is possible to see all the methods, classes, constructors and parameters for both older version and modified version. By comparing all the methods, classes and interfaces of both the versions it is possible to find the differences that change the program behavior. The algorithm for finding semantic differences has been evaluated by testing it on various test cases. By making changes in the original file and in the modified file. Like adding methods and deleting methods and adding classes to the files. The algorithm highlights those methods with green color which are added newly in the modified file and highlights the methods with red color in the original file which got deleted in modified file. This algorithm also finds the textual difference between two files and highlights those lines which are changed in modified file and which got deleted from original file.
|
6 |
Semantic differences and Graphical View of FilesMohammed, Rafiullah Khan, Bandi, Raghavender January 2009 (has links)
<p>This Master’s thesis presents an algorithm that finds the semantic differences between two versions of files, an older version and a new modified version of the file. The algorithm is responsible for finding changes in the program’s behavior and displaying them graphically. By this a lot of time can be saved because it is not necessary to go through the whole file to find the differences.</p><p> </p><p>The program, Semantic Diff, developed in this master thesis uses the Javacc parser generator which is used to parse files and generate the abstract syntax tree for them. Using this tree it is possible to see all the methods, classes, constructors and parameters for both older version and modified version. By comparing all the methods, classes and interfaces of both the versions it is possible to find the differences that change the program behavior.</p><p> </p><p>The algorithm for finding semantic differences has been evaluated by testing it on various test cases. By making changes in the original file and in the modified file. Like adding methods and deleting methods and adding classes to the files. The algorithm highlights those methods with green color which are added newly in the modified file and highlights the methods with red color in the original file which got deleted in modified file. This algorithm also finds the textual difference between two files and highlights those lines which are changed in modified file and which got deleted from original file.</p><p> </p>
|
7 |
Processamento de documentos XML com DOM e SAX : : uma análise comparativaSoares dos Santos, Maísa January 2003 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-12T15:58:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
arquivo4730_1.pdf: 1803717 bytes, checksum: dc74518aee32c5757aeb57c3b0776021 (MD5)
license.txt: 1748 bytes, checksum: 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2003 / XML (eXtensible Markup Language) tem sido um padrão bastante usado para armazenar,
manipular e trocar dados. Mas para serem úteis, esses dados precisam estar disponíveis de
alguma maneira para a aplicação. Existem duas APIs (Application Programming Interface)
que disponibilizam dados XML para as aplicações, uma baseada em objetos e outra baseada
em eventos. Essas são representadas, respectivamente, por DOM - Document Object Model
e por SAX - Simple API for XML. A escolha de qual API utilizar será baseado nos
requisitos das aplicações e nas características das APIs.
Estas APIs são implementadas por ferramentas chamadas parsers. Cada parser
possui suas próprias características. A escolha do parser é um importante critério para o
desempenho das aplicações, pois grande parte do processamento ficará concentrada nele.
Este trabalho tem como objetivo realizar um estudo comparativo entre as APIs
DOM e SAX, mostrando as características destas APIs, suas vantagens e desvantagens,
onde cada uma obtém melhor desempenho, e seu comportamento em uma aplicação.
Adicionalmente é feita uma análise de algumas ferramentas de processamento de
documentos XML encontradas no mercado, mostrando as características e a performance
de cada uma
|
8 |
The wisent Parser GeneratorPreußer, Thomas 14 November 2012 (has links)
Objective: This document is not an introduction to parser generators. Readers should rather have a good understanding of them, especially of LALR parser generators. This document merely describes the main aspects of the implementation of a LALR parser generator named wisent. It is divided into a concise description of the programming interface and an overview over the data structures and specifics of the implementation of the wisent parser generator.
|
9 |
Some aspects of error correction of programming languagesFrentiu, M. January 1976 (has links)
The thesis treats the problem of error correction in a context free language, and the design of an error correcting parser for the BASIC language. Two important things can be said about this thesis. First, it presents the problem of error correction in a context free language, and the existing results in the field. The concept of a context free language as a model for a programming language, and the definitions and results used later are presented or reviewed. A distance between two strings is defined and used to develop a “minimum distance error correcting parser”. Second, the thesis develops two global error correcting parsers. The first one is the top-down global error correcting parser, obtained by transforming Unger’s top-down parser into an error correcting one. Then the idea of Graham and Rhodes, of condensing the surrounding context of error, is extended, and a global simple precedence error correcting parser is obtained by analysing the whole content of the error, available from the input string. These parsers, and other known methods are then used to design and partially implement an error correcting parser for BASIC.
|
10 |
Extended Metamodelica Based Integrated Copiler GeneratorPalanisamy, Arunkumar January 2012 (has links)
OMCCp is a new generation (not yet released) of the OpenModelica Compiler-Compiler parser generator which contains an LALR parser generator implemented in the MetaModelica language with parsing tables generated by the tools Flex and GNU Bison. It also contains very good error handling and is integrated with the MetaModelica semantics specification language. The main benefit with this master thesis project is the development of new version of OMCCp with complete support for an extended Modelica grammar for a complete OMCCp-based Modelica parser. The implemented parser has been tested and the results have been analyzed. This is a new enhanced generation OMCCp with improvements made from the previous version. This version support Modelica as well as the language extensions for MetaModelica, ParModelica, and optimization problem specification. Moreover, the generated parsers are about three times faster than those from the old OMCCp.
|
Page generated in 0.0246 seconds