Spelling suggestions: "subject:"patrimonial autonomy"" "subject:"matrimonial autonomy""
1 |
A função cautelar do incidente de desconsideração da personalidade juridica na fase de conhecimentoCastro, Roberta Dias Tarpinian de 08 March 2018 (has links)
Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-04-13T13:53:46Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Roberta Dias Tarpinian de Castro.pdf: 1693367 bytes, checksum: 3691b326ea1d54e5410c06cccc605fe5 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-04-13T13:53:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Roberta Dias Tarpinian de Castro.pdf: 1693367 bytes, checksum: 3691b326ea1d54e5410c06cccc605fe5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-03-08 / The present paper has the purpose of analyzing the reasons why the incident of disregard doctrine established in the cognizance phase has a preventive function. In order to reach the aimed conclusion, the paper will analyze the disregard doctrine by the material aspect, studying why an institute of procedural law, which seeks to eliminate the autonomy of assets existing between a legal entity and its members, preventing third parties from receiving credits for which they are entitled (financial loss), can be set up at a procedural moment where there is still no credit (cognizance phase) / O presente trabalho tem a finalidade de analisar as razões pelas quais o incidente de desconsideração da personalidade jurídica instaurado na fase de conhecimento tem função cautelar. Para chegar à almejada conclusão, o trabalho analisará a desconsideração da personalidade jurídica pelo prisma material, estudando porque um instituto de direito processual, que visa afastar a autonomia patrimonial existente entre pessoa jurídica e seus integrantes, evitando que terceiros deixem de receber créditos aos quais tem direito (prejuízo financeiro), pode ser instauração em um momento processual em que ainda não há crédito (fase de conhecimento)
|
2 |
L'administration des biens des Missions catholiques du Cameroun allemand (Kamerun) et du Cameroun français : vers une quête d'autonomie patrimoniale / The administration of German and French Catholic Missions property : on the quest for patrimonial autonomy ?Noma Bikibili, Paul 12 October 2018 (has links)
Cette étude examine l’administration des biens d’Église en territoire de mission, sous l’angle de la quête d’autonomie patrimoniale. Elle évalue la mise en route progressive de l’autonomie patrimoniale des Églises devant succéder aux Missions catholiques, à travers l’analyse des sources depuis l’érection en 1622 de la Sacrée Congrégation de Propaganda Fide chargée des Missions catholiques. Ses efforts de financement s’annonçaient déjà insuffisants. Au XIXe siècle elle prescrivit une administration des biens en lien avec la quête d’autonomie patrimoniale. Une exigence prévoyant l’institution d’un clergé indigène devant trouver ses propres ressources. Elle instaura la pratique d’envoyer des vicaires apostoliques dans les territoires de mission pour mettre en route l’autonomie patrimoniale. Les vingt-cinq années d’administration des biens par les Pallottins se soldèrent par une autonomie financière, défi difficile pour les Spiritains. / This study examines the administration of the property of Catholic Missions in mission territory, from the perspective of the quest for patrimonial autonomy. It evaluates of the gradual implementation of the patrimonial autonomy of the future Churches to succeed the catholic Missions, through the analysis of sources since the erection on 1622 of the Sacred Congregation of Propaganda Fide in charge of catholic Missions. Its financing efforts announced insufficient. In the nineteenth century it prescribed an administration of property in connection with the quest for patrimonial autonomy. Such a requirement provided for the institution of a native clergy to find their own resources. It established the practice of sending apostolic vicars to mission territories to initiate the quest for patrimonial autonomy. The twenty-five years of administration of the property by the Pallottines ended in financial autonomy, a difficult challenge for the Spiritans.
|
3 |
Ação rescisória por divergência jurisprudencial / The jurisprudential divergence rescissory actionFidalgo, Alexandre 18 October 2013 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Alexandre Fidalgo.pdf: 16088782 bytes, checksum: e136f0aff41651cea382a81612b81f29 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-10-18 / This study aims to discuss the possibility of rescissory action based on article 485, V,
of the Code of Civil Procedure, under the justification of jurisprudential divergence. It defends that the merit decision transited in rem judicatam may be rescinded if it is contrary to
prevailing jurisprudence at the time, considering analogous situations and incurred in a
similar historical and social moment, under penalty of offense to the principle of isonomy, not
applicable the Supreme Court Precedent Nr. 343 as being unconstitutional. Under the same
argument, it presents the possibility of rescissory action against decision that does not obey
the binding precedent and decision contrary to prevailing jurisprudence determined later. It
also defends the possibility of rescissory action against sentence based on rule of law later
declared unconstitutional and against decision declaring unconstitutional rule of law later
declared constitutional. The study is presented in three main parts. The first one relates to the concepts and legal nature of the rescissory action, its admissibility presuppositions and the
traditional assumptions of rescissory action. The second part addresses the issue of the
possibility of rescissory action based on jurisprudential divergence. Finally; the third part is
dedicated to the concepts of the rescissory action elements (parties, cause of action and claim
- ius rescindens and ius rescissorium), as well as it address the jurisdiction and the
suspension of effects of the rescinded decision / O presente 'trabalho tem por objeto discutir a possibilidade de ação rescisória, fundamentada no artigo 485, V, do Código de Processo Civil, sob a, justificativa de -', divergência jurisprudencial. Defende que a decisão de mérito transitada em julgado pode ser rescindida se for contrária à jurisprudência dominante à época, considerando situações análogas e havidas em um idêntico momento histórico e social, sob pena de ofensa ao princípio da isonomia, não sendo aplicável a Súmula. 343 do STF, por ser inconstitucional. Sob esse mesmo argumento, apresenta a possibilidade de ação rescisória contra decisão que não obedecer a súmula vinculante, além de decisão contrária a jurisprudência dominante fixada posteriormente. Também defende a possibilidade de ação rescisória contra sentença fundada em norma posteriormente declarada inconstitucional e contra decisão que considerou inconstitucional norma posteriormente declarada constitucional. O trabalho se apresenta em três grandes partes. A primeira diz respeito aos conceitos e natureza jurídica da ação rescisória, seus pressupostos de admissibilidade e as hipóteses tradicionais da ação rescisória. Na segunda parte, aborda o tema da possibilidade de ação rescisória fundamentada em Divergência jurisprudencial. Por fim, a parte final é dedicada aos conceitos da competência da ação rescisória e da suspensão dos efeitos da decisão rescindenda
|
Page generated in 0.0422 seconds