As a case study in cultural production and consumption and of the commodification of culture in late seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England, this study examines how musicians in London began to emerge from their dependence on the patronage of court, aristocracy and church into a more public sphere, moving from positions as salaried employees to a more freelance existence where they contributed to their income by putting on public commercial concerts. Taking as its starting point the almost 50,000 references to music recorded in the Register of Music in London Newspapers 1660–1750, a database has been built to record detailed information extracted from over 12,000 advertisements, puffs and news items related to commercial concert giving in London between 1660 and 1750. Concert advertisements and other material may thus be studied longitudinally in relation to each other, providing a valuable source of data for the growth of concert giving in London over a long and important period of its development. Public commercial concerts emerged in London in the period following the restoration of Charles II in 1660, developing from private music meetings dominated by amateur performers and informal public performances by professionals in taverns via John Banister's first advertised concerts in 1672. By 1750, public commercial concerts in London may not have achieved their final form or the heights of popularity that accompanied the ‘rage for music' of the 1790s, but they were promoted regularly and with a clear sense of programme planning, laying the foundations for later expansion. The possibility for musicians to make a living as freelance professionals without having to rely solely on patronage, their development of commercial skills, their emerging links with music publishers, all this is witness to the birth of music as a business in London in the period between 1660 and 1750.

Qu’est-ce que jouer au XXIe siècle des musiques de la Renaissance ? Prenant acte de ce que la richesse d’une expérience réside dans sa singularité, cette thèse fait le pari de répondre à cette question générale en s’intéressant à un processus particulier : la répétition et l’enregistrement d’une chanson du XVIe siècle par un ensemble spécialisé. Dès lors que l’on s’efforce de prendre les détails au sérieux, il semble que le suivi rapproché de ces musiciens-là, engagés en 2014 dans la performance réitérée de « Suzanne un jour » de Didier Lupi, présente bien un intérêt en tant que tel. Cela permet d’appréhender non seulement ce qui fait advenir et évoluer une proposition musicale, mais également les modalités de l’expérience collective et individuelle afférente. En outre, cette épistémologie singulariste rivée aux détails s’avère fructueuse à d’autres échelles, qu’il s’agisse de revenir sur cinq semaines de l’élaboration d’un projet discographique ou d’écrire cinq siècles d’histoire de « Suzanne ». / What does it mean to play Renaissance music in the 21st century? Taking into account that the depth of an experience derives from its singularity, the present dissertation looks at this general question by focusing on a specific process: a specialized ensemble rehearsing and recording a 16th century song. A close reading of this process makes it clear that there is inherent value in observing musicians in the year 2014 engaged in repeat performances of “Suzanne un jour” by Didier Lupi. This observation clarifies how a musical performance is created and developed and reveals the modalities of the collective and individual experiences involved. Moreover, this detail-oriented and singularist epistemology is useful in other respects, whether to comprehend a five-week recording project or to write a five-century history of “Suzanne.”