In this work author analyses social functions of law and their realization in Lithuania. Social destination of law and separate ranges of social functions of law are analyzed separately. Author highlighted the key problems of person`s socialization in Lithuania. In his opinion they are closely connected to implementation of social functions of Law. Analyzing the work of Lithuanian “Seimas” it is amplified that there must be a tight link between society and legistrator which is in the form of open dialogue with domination of reciprocal trust and understanding. Studying the problems of implementation of social functions of Law in system of courts, first of all is amplified that courts as institutions responsible for legality’s consolidation in the country, implementation of social functions of law is more restricted than law – creative parties. After realizing the fact of human rights breach in society and some kind of deflections from stable life settled in society, the court (judge) cannot remove risen problems by himself. An initiative of society’s citizens for endeavouring the justice is needful. Overlooking the problems of implementation of social functions of Law in LR “Seimas” controllers activity, author states that controllers without the help of law – creative party can not eliminate deflection that was discovered in the rule. Discovering a deflection as a statement of fact is not enough for aiming to affect positively the processes of socialization that run in... [to full text]