Sprayer hygiene and concerns of off-target injury from auxin herbicides have increased in recent years. New auxin tolerant crops have broadened the use patterns of these herbicides. Therefore, experiments were conducted across two locations in Mississippi in 2016, 2017, and 2018 to evaluate sprayer cleanout procedures to aid in dicamba removal. Standard sprayer cleanout consisted of a triple rinse of 10% tank volume, with either a tank cleaner or ammonia added in the second rinse. Samples collected in each rinse step for all treatments were applied to actively growing soybean and dicamba concentration quantified with HPLC. Experiments were conducted to determine if various tank cleaners and ammonia produce visual injury when applied to actively growing soybean and cotton alone and in conjunction with glyphosate. No tank cleaner caused visual injury nor affected plant heights or yield. Furthermore, experiments were conducted to evaluate tank cleaner effectiveness to remove dicamba utilizing the standard cleanout procedure, with increased rinse volumes, sequence of water and tank cleaner rinses, and cleanout effectiveness following durations of idle time from application to cleanout. No tank cleaner provided greater dicamba removal, with all cleaners performing the same as cleanouts utilizing water alone. Increasing rinse volumes did not positively affect dicamba removal compared to 10% rinse volumes. Multiple rinse steps utilizing a tank cleaner or altering the standard cleanout procedure utilizing a water-tank cleaner-water rinse sequence did not result in greater dicamba removal from contaminated sprayer systems. Finally, increases in time between contamination with dicamba and cleanout did not negatively influence dicamba removal using the standard cleanout procedure.

Adjuvants can enhance the performance of the pesticide active ingredients in many ways including decreasing surface tension and reducing evaporation. Understanding how adjuvants effect pesticide behavior (e.g., surface persistence) is crucial for developing effective pesticide formulations, as well as facilitating the development of effective approaches to reduce pesticide residues from the surface of fresh produce post-harvest. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of a non-ionic surfactant, Surf-Ac 910, on the persistence of two model pesticides, thiabendazole and phosmet on apple surfaces. The result shows that the addition of Surf-Ac 910 increased both the maximum wetted area and evaporation rate of thiabendazole, a systemic pesticide, and phosmet, a non-systemic pesticide. Utilizing surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy to explore the surface and penetrative behaviors of thiabendazole and phosmet revealed that the addition of Surf-Ac 910 influenced the Raman signal of pesticides as well. The addition of Surf-Ac 910 decreased the Raman signal intensity when added to phosmet but did not affect the Raman signal intensity when added to thiabendazole. In terms of penetration, the addition of Surf-Ac 910 did not affect the penetration depth of phosmet but slightly increased the penetration depth of thiabendazole. These findings were true for both short-term, 40 minutes, and long-term, 3 days, exposure. Next, the effects of adjuvants on the removal of pesticide residues were investigated. Common household materials, such as baking soda, were effective at removing surface pesticide residues. After testing a variety of baking soda concentrations and starch granules, 2% baking soda and 2% corn starch were found to be the most effective baking soda concentration and starch granule respectively. 2% corn starch was the most effective removal method overall, with 99% of pesticide with/without adjuvant removed in just 5 minutes of wash time. Overall, this study demonstrated that although adjuvant Surf-Ac 910 could affect the surface persistence of pesticides, washing with common household materials such as 2% corn starch can be used as an effective, safe, and economic way to reduce pesticide exposure through fresh produce.