O presente trabalho recorre à Filosofia da Química como viés para investigar o processo de ensino-aprendizagem em duas disciplinas de Química Geral em um curso para formação de químicos. A investigação se baseou em diversas fontes: respostas dos estudantes via questionários, gravações de aulas, atividade dos estudantes em aula, resposta esperada pelo professor para essa atividade e entrevistas com professores das disciplinas, a fim de possibilitar a triangulação dos resultados. Procurou-se caracterizar a preferência dos estudantes e professores acerca dos tipos de teorias e evidências utilizadas em suas explicações. As teorias hipotéticas e as evidências experimentais mediadas por instrumentos analíticos, como o espectrofotômetro, foram preferidas pelos professores, mas os estudantes mostraram dificuldades em lidar com elas neste momento inicial de sua formação superior. Foi percebida, também, uma tensão subjacente entre a química das moléculas e a química das substâncias, cuja relação está internalizada pelos professores mas não pelos alunos, e que se reflete em suas escolhas pelos tipos de explicações. Essa tensão pode ser entendida a partir da relação entre fazer química (baseado fortemente em instrumentos para separação e caracterização de compostos, e nas teorias que descrevem a química das moléculas) e ensinar química em uma disciplina introdutória (como escolher conteúdos e abordagens que permitam entender a relação entre o nível fenomenológico macroscópico e os modelos explicativos submicroscópicos). Para o químico em formação, observar uma evidência experimental e relacioná-la com uma teoria que envolve entidades submicroscópicas para formar uma explicação é um processo muito complexo. Esse processo fica ainda mais complexo quando a evidência a ser utilizada é mediada por um instrumento. Assim, os resultados obtidos e apresentados nesta tese apontam para a questão de que a diferença entre os tipos de evidências experimentais (mediadas e não mediadas) não pode ser tratada como um conhecimento tácito no ensino superior de Química Geral. / This thesis takes the philosophy of chemistry as a guide to investigate the process of teaching and learning in two general chemistry disciplines in a training course for chemists. In order to enable triangulation of results, the study relied on several sources: students\' responses to questionnaires, recording of classes, classroom students\' activities, expected responses by the lecturer for activities, and interviews with the lecturers. The investigation sought to characterize the preferences of students and lecturers about the kinds of theories and evidences used in their explanations. Lecturers preferred hypothetical theories and experimental evidences mediated by analytical instruments such as the spectrophotometer. However, students showed difficulties in dealing with such theories and mediated evidences in this initial stage of their education. A subjacent tension between the chemistry of molecules and the chemistry of substances, whose relation is internalized by the lecturers but not by the students, was also reflected in their choices for the types of explanations. Such tension can be understood considering the relationship between making chemistry (which is strongly based on instruments for separation and characterization of compounds, and on theories which describe the behavior of molecules) and teaching chemistry on an introductory course (which requires the choosing of contents and approaches to describe the relationship between the macroscopic phenomenological level and the submicroscopic explanatory models). For a chemistry undergraduate, observing an experimental evidence and relating it to a theory which involves submicroscopic entities to form an explanation is a very complex process. This process becomes even more complex when the evidence to be used is mediated by instruments. Thus, the results obtained and presented in this thesis point to the issue that the difference between the types of experimental evidences (direct or mediated) cannot be treated as a tacit knowledge in a General Chemistry university course.

This thesis addresses key issues of scientific realism in the philosophy of biology and chemistry through investigation of an underexplored research domain: olfaction theory, or the science of smell. It also provides the first systematic overview of the development of olfactory practices and research into the molecular basis of odours across the 19th and 20th century. Historical and contemporary explanations and modelling techniques for understanding the material basis of odours are analysed with a specific focus on the entrenchment of technological process, research tradition and the definitions of materiality for understanding scientific advancement. The thesis seeks to make sense of the explanatory and problem solving strategies, different ways of reasoning and the construction of facts by drawing attention to the role and application of scientific representations in olfactory practices. Scientific representations such as models, classifications, maps, diagrams, lists etc. serve a variety of purposes that range from the stipulation of relevant properties and correlations of the research materials and the systematic formation of research questions, to the design of experiments that explore or test particular hypotheses. By examining a variety of modelling strategies in olfactory research, I elaborate on how I understand the relation between representations and the world and why this relation requires a pluralist perspective on scientific models, methods and practices. Through this work I will show how a plurality of representations does not pose a problem for realism about scientific entities and their theoretical contexts but, on the contrary, that this plurality serves as the most reliable grounding for a realistic interpretation of scientific representations of the world and the entities it contains. The thesis concludes that scientific judgement has to be understood through its disciplinary trajectory, and that scientific pluralism is a direct consequence of the historicity of scientific development.