• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • No language data
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Differential Effects of Tort Reform Across Medical Specialties

Dodds, William C 01 January 2012 (has links)
This paper utilizes data on physician malpractice insurance premiums and state tort law to analyze how physicians in various medical specialties are differentially affected by caps on noneconomic damages. As higher premiums put pressure on legislators to enact damage caps, I instrument caps on noneconomic damages with enactment of tort reform measures that do not affect malpractice premiums to uncover the effect of caps on noneconomic damages on such premiums. I find evidence to support that, in terms of dollars saved, physicians in high risk specialties benefit more from noneconomic damage caps than physicians in low risk specialties. However, in percentage terms, I find that physicians in all specialties essentially benefit equally from caps on noneconomic damages.
2

USE OF ORAL CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC MEDICATIONS IN NON-TRADITIONAL AMBULATORY SETTINGS

Arora, Sameer 04 December 2009 (has links)
Background: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in economically developed countries. The use and availability of oral treatment for cancer has increased dramatically in the past 10 years. Few studies have described the use of oral chemotherapy in non-traditional ambulatory settings by health care professionals across different specialties. Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe the usage of oral chemotherapeutic medications in ambulatory settings. Methods: Cross sectional study of 2007 NAMCS Survey analysis involving 21,761 subjects aged 18 years and above with cancer who participated in the 2007 National Ambulatory Medical Survey (NAMCS). Main Outcome Measure: Physician-reported use of oral chemotherapeutic medications (includes all major drug classes) as indicated on questionnaire for 2007 NAMCS survey. Results: Health care providers in non-traditional settings are less likely to prescribe oral chemotherapy than in traditional ambulatory settings (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=0.65{95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.69}). The study results suggest that oncologists are prescribing oral anti-cancer drugs the most as compared to other physician specialties. Conclusion: Health care providers in non-traditional settings are less likely to prescribe oral chemotherapy than in traditional ambulatory settings. Primary care physicians may have limited experience in monitoring and prescribing these potentially toxic medications. Clear guidelines are required for the use of oral chemotherapy medications, considering the potential for their use in non-traditional ambulatory settings and by non-oncologists.

Page generated in 0.044 seconds