No description available.

The water budget for a period of one year on a small instrumented semiarid subwatershed was evaluated. The evaluation was accomplished by identifying and quantifying the primary components of the water budget, rainfall, surface runoff, soil moisture content, and (collectively) other water losses. In addition to the evaluation of the water budget, regression models of surface runoff, soil moisture content, and suspended sediment were developed. Finally, chemical analysis of the runoff waters and an evaluation of a water balance simulation model were made. The study site, a 6.5-hectare subwatershed which lies on the southeastern portion of the Atterbury Watershed, is located about 16 km east of Tucson, Arizona. It has an elevation of about 3200 feet (975 m), with an average slope of about 3 percent. The mean annual precipitation is about 28 cm falling during two distinct seasons, summer and winter. The soil textural classification on the Atterbury Watershed ranges from sandy to clay loam. The evaluation of the water budget provided an index of how much of the total precipitation for the study year is attributed to each of the primary components of the water budget. Surface runoff, soil moisture content, and other water losses accounted for about 2, 55, and 43 percent of the total rainfall. Rainfall and related rainfall characteristics, such as intensity and duration, were found to be significant variables in regression models predicting surface runoff, soil moisture content, and suspended sediment. The chemical constituents of the waters were either within or lower than the limits set by the United States Public Health Service, World Health Organization and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The usefulness of the BUM water balance model in simulating surface runoff from the study area was inconclusive.

The following thesis describes part of a set of ore specimens collected by James Gilluly and the writer at Ajo, Arizona during the early summer of 1932. This field work was done for the United States Geological Survey, and while considerable geologic work was done, only passing mention will be made concerning the geology, as the conclusions reached properly belong to Mr. Gilluly and will be published by him at some future time. Mr Eldred Wilson of the Arizona Bureau of Mines has kindly put at my disposal a number of polished sections which he collected in 1923 from the semi-oxidized zone in the southwest part of the orebody. In all, about 50 polished sections were studied in detail and the conclusions reached concerning the paragenesis of the ore minerals are based entirely upon the evidence presented by these sections, as the field relations are not in my possession.

No description available.

No description available.

The purpose of this study was (1) to describe the beliefs of environmentally-concerned community leaders regarding community needs for education about the environment, and (2) to describe the environmental education provided in the past, present, and planned for the future in Pima County, Arizona. Respondents believed that there were many environmental issues of importance to Pima County and that efforts to educate the community about these issues were inadequate. The issues considered most important tended to be those regarding environmental problems--air pollution, toxic substances, waste management. The most frequent topics of the environmental education provided by the respondents, however, tended to be those regarding natural resources--habitats, wildlife, water. Respondents believed in the need for an environmental education council and master plan. Most felt that lack of funding and absence of a master plan were major obstacles to providing adequate environmental education in the community.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.