Eukaryotic organisms require the ability to respond to their environments. They do so by utilizing signal transduction pathways that allow for signals to effect final biological responses. Many times, these final responses require new gene expression events that have been stimulated or repressed within the nucleus. Thus, much of the understanding of signal transduction pathways converges on the understanding of how signaling affects gene expression alterations (Kumar et al., 2004). The regulation of gene expression involves the modification of chromatin between condensed (closed, silent) and expanded (open, active) states. Histone modifications, such as acetylation, can determine the open versus closed status of chromatin. The PHD (Plant HomeoDomain) finger is a structural domain primarily found in nuclear proteins across eukaryotes. This domain specifically recognizes the epigenetic marks H3K4me2 and H3K4me3, which are di- and tri-methylated lysine 4 residues of Histone H3 (Loewith et al., 2000; Kuzmichev et al., 2002; Vieyra et al. 2002; Shiseki et al., 2003; Pedeux et al., 2005, Doyon et al., 2006). It is estimated that there are ~150 proteins that contain the PHD finger in humans (Solimon and Riabowol, 2007). The PHD finger is conserved in yeast and plants, however an analysis of this domain has only been performed done in Arabidopsis thaliana (Lee et al., 2009). The work presented in this report aims to extend the analysis of this domain in plants by identifying the PHD fingers of the crop species Oryza sativa (rice). In addition, a phylogenetic analysis of all PHD fingers in Arabidopsis and rice was undertaken. From these analyses, it was determined that there are 78 PHD fingers in Arabidopsis and 70 in rice. In addition, these domains can be categorized into classes and groups by defining features within the conserved motif. In a separate study, I investigated the function of two of the PHD finger proteins from Arabidopsis, ING1 (INhibitor of Growth1) and ING2. In humans, these proteins can be found in complexes associated with both open and closed chromatin. They facilitate chromatin remodeling by recruiting histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases to chromatin (Doyon et al., 2006, Pena et al., 2006). In addition, these proteins recognize H3K4me2/3 marks and are believed to be "interpreters" of the histone code (Pena et al., 2006, Shi et al., 2006). To understand the function of ING proteins in plants, I took a reverse genetics approach and characterized ing1 and ing2 mutants. My analysis revealed that these mutants are altered in time of flowering, as well as their response to nutrient and stress conditions. Lastly, I was able to show that ING2 protein interacts in vitro with SnRK1.1, a nutrient/stress sensor (Baena-Gonzalez et al., 2007). These results indicate a novel function for PHD proteins in plant growth, development and stress response. / Master of Science

Though antibodies as therapeutics are limited to extracellular targets, their repertoire of molecular interactions has particular relevance to the many intracellular cellular proteins for which small molecule screening has reached impasse. For such proteins there is little recourse to theory, since molecular recognition is, in practical terms, still not well understood. Here I apply antibody discovery to the lysine demthylases KDM4D and PHF8, two proteins difficult to inhibit selectively due to the similarity of their binding pockets to those of the larger family. With a selective, picomolar affinity antibody, dependent on residues distal to the KDM4D active site, I present what is likely the first example of allosteric inhibition of a KDM4 lysine demethylase, demonstrating that there is opportunity outside active sites oversubscribed with pan inhibitors. Antibody discovery for PHF8, however, was plagued by a familiar problem: antibodies that bound when their antigen was immobilised directly to a surface, but barely bound at all when it was free in solution. The common explanation is that the partial denaturation that accompanies immobilisation reveals epitopes unavailable in solution, but examining the problem in detail for the Plant Homeodomain of PHF8 revealed a connection to its rarely sampled conformations. The prominence these antibodies in the immune responses to PHF8, and to some extent KDM4D, motivates two hypotheses on their origin: either the states are very immunogenic or there is a connection between states of irreversible damage and those sampled reversibly, but rarely, by a protein in solution.