Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2018-04-18T21:03:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Daniela Chies_Disserta??o.pdf: 1621624 bytes, checksum: 9509ffa0a2d8eb095b4ccfcacdf11e8a (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-07T14:36:04Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Daniela Chies_Disserta??o.pdf: 1621624 bytes, checksum: 9509ffa0a2d8eb095b4ccfcacdf11e8a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-07T14:41:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Daniela Chies_Disserta??o.pdf: 1621624 bytes, checksum: 9509ffa0a2d8eb095b4ccfcacdf11e8a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-08 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / A focused look to the present reveals that the myth in which the Estate is keeper of the monopoly of the legitimate use of strength within the limits of it's own territory has been undermined by the insertion of various private actors in the field of social control. The private policing has been expanded in number and diversification. This seems to denote a singular event, since the modern Estate until then, was marked by the nationalization of the police force. In this context, private policing begins to exert control lined by security directives of prevention and management of risk through business directives of cost reduction and efficiency increase. This private security appears less and less like a complimentary activity to the public safety, acting now like the true replacement of a something previously inefficient. This work has as objective, through a genealogical reconstruction of the present, unearth the motives that produced this reality. We believe that the changes mentioned previously in the manners of control were ignited by the emergency of neoliberal rationality, which shifts the idea of policing from matters of social rights for the matters of economy and efficiency. Besides that, a neoliberal strategy binds the causality of everyday risks to individual choices and imbues them total responsibility for their own safety. This research also has as objective contextualize the private policing as an apparatus in the Foucaltian sense of the term and show the consequences of the modus vivendi that his role implies. / Um olhar atento para o presente revela que o mito, segundo o qual o Estado ? o detentor do monop?lio do uso leg?timo da for?a dentro dos limites do seu territ?rio, tem sido corro?do pela inser??o de diversos atores privados no campo do controle social. O policiamento privado tem se expandido em n?mero e se diversificado em formas. Isso parece marcar um evento singular, posto que o Estado moderno, at? ent?o, era caracterizado pela estatiza??o das for?as policiais. Nesse contexto, o policiamento privado passa a exercer um controle pautado por l?gicas securit?rias de preven??o e gerenciamento de riscos e por l?gicas empresariais de redu??o de custos e aumento da efici?ncia. Essa seguran?a particularizada aparece cada vez menos como uma atividade complementar ? seguran?a p?blica, passando a atuar como um verdadeiro substituto de algo ineficaz. O trabalho objetiva, por meio de uma reconstru??o geneal?gica do presente, desocultar os motivos que produziram essa realidade. Cremos que as modifica??es nas formas de controle foram alavancadas pela emerg?ncia da racionalidade neoliberal, que desloca a ideia de policiamento de uma quest?o de direito social para um problema de economia e efici?ncia. Al?m disso, a estrat?gia neoliberal vincula a causalidade dos riscos cotidianos ?s escolhas individuais e imputa ao neosujeito a total responsabilidade pela manuten??o de sua seguran?a. A pesquisa tamb?m tem como objetivo conceituar o policiamento privado como um dispositivo no sentido foucaultiano do termo e demonstrar as consequ?ncias sobre o modus vivendi que a sua atua??o implica