Spelling suggestions: "subject:"porcine endogenous retrovirus"" "subject:"porcines endogenous retrovirus""
1 |
Studies using pseudotyped retroviral vectorsMahoney, Catherine H. January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Characterising and Mapping Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs)Lee, Jun Heon January 2001 (has links)
The initial focus of this PhD project was on comparative gene mapping. Comparative gene mapping is facilitated by consensus PCR primers which amplify homologous gene fragments in many species. As a part of an international co-ordinated programme of comparative mapping in pigs, 47 CATS (Comparative Anchor Tagged Sequence) consensus primer pairs for loci located on human chromosomes 9, 10, 20, and 22, were used for amplifying homologous loci in pigs. After optimization of PCR conditions, 23 CATS products have confirmed by comparison with homologous sequences in GenBank. A French somatic cell hybrid panel was used to physically map the 6 porcine CATS products distinguishable from rodent background product, namely ADRA1A, ADRA2A, ARSA, GNAS1, OXT and TOP1. Of these, the map location of ADRA1A and OXT showed inconsistency with the previously recognised conserved relationship between human and pig. The other four loci mapped to positions consistent with known syntenic relationships. Despite low levels of polymorphism, frequently indistinguishable rodent and porcine products in somatic hybrids and some confusion of identity of gene family members, these CATS primers have made a useful contribution to the porcine-human comparative map. The focus of the project then changed to genetic and molecular characterisation of endogenous retroviruses in pigs and their relatives. Pigs are regarded as a potentially good source of organs and tissues for transplantation into humans. However, porcine endogenous retroviruses have emerged as a possible problem as they can infect cultured human cells. Two main types of pig retrovirus, determined by envelope protein, PERV-A and PERV-B, are widely distributed in different pig breeds and a third less common type, PERV-C, has also been recognised. Endogenous retroviruses were analyzed from the Westran (Westmead transplantation) inbred line of pig, specially bred for biomedical research. Thirty-one 1.8 kb env PCR product clones were sequenced after preliminary screening with the restriction enzymes KpnI and MboI. Five recombinant clones between A and B were identified. 55% of clones (17/31) sequenced had stop codons within the envelope protein-encoding region, which would prevent the retrovirus from making full-length envelope protein recognizable by cell-surface receptors of the virus. The endogenous viruses were physically mapped in Westran pigs by FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation) using PERV-A and PERV-B envelope clones as probes. Preliminary FISH data suggest that there are at least 22 PERVs (13 PERV-A and 9 PERV-B) and the chromosomal locations of these in the Westran strain are quite different from European Large White pigs. The sequences and mapping results of inbred Westran pig suggest that there are relatively few PERV integration sites compared with commercial pigs and further that a large proportion of clones are defective due to premature stop codons in the envelope gene. To investigate the relationship of endogenous retroviruses in peccaries and pigs, a set of degenerate primers was used to amplify peccary retroviral sequences. The sequences of two putative retroviral clones showed close homology, albeit with a 534 bp deletion, to mouse and pig retroviral sequences. Also, four non-target sequences were amplified from peccary with the degenerate retroviral primers. They are a part of the peccary cofilin gene, a SINE, and a sequence containing a microsatellite. The peccary endogenous retroviral sequences are significant in that they are the first such sequences reported in peccary species and repudiate old claims in the literature that peccaries do not have C-type retroviral sequences.
|
3 |
Characterising and Mapping Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs)Lee, Jun Heon January 2001 (has links)
The initial focus of this PhD project was on comparative gene mapping. Comparative gene mapping is facilitated by consensus PCR primers which amplify homologous gene fragments in many species. As a part of an international co-ordinated programme of comparative mapping in pigs, 47 CATS (Comparative Anchor Tagged Sequence) consensus primer pairs for loci located on human chromosomes 9, 10, 20, and 22, were used for amplifying homologous loci in pigs. After optimization of PCR conditions, 23 CATS products have confirmed by comparison with homologous sequences in GenBank. A French somatic cell hybrid panel was used to physically map the 6 porcine CATS products distinguishable from rodent background product, namely ADRA1A, ADRA2A, ARSA, GNAS1, OXT and TOP1. Of these, the map location of ADRA1A and OXT showed inconsistency with the previously recognised conserved relationship between human and pig. The other four loci mapped to positions consistent with known syntenic relationships. Despite low levels of polymorphism, frequently indistinguishable rodent and porcine products in somatic hybrids and some confusion of identity of gene family members, these CATS primers have made a useful contribution to the porcine-human comparative map. The focus of the project then changed to genetic and molecular characterisation of endogenous retroviruses in pigs and their relatives. Pigs are regarded as a potentially good source of organs and tissues for transplantation into humans. However, porcine endogenous retroviruses have emerged as a possible problem as they can infect cultured human cells. Two main types of pig retrovirus, determined by envelope protein, PERV-A and PERV-B, are widely distributed in different pig breeds and a third less common type, PERV-C, has also been recognised. Endogenous retroviruses were analyzed from the Westran (Westmead transplantation) inbred line of pig, specially bred for biomedical research. Thirty-one 1.8 kb env PCR product clones were sequenced after preliminary screening with the restriction enzymes KpnI and MboI. Five recombinant clones between A and B were identified. 55% of clones (17/31) sequenced had stop codons within the envelope protein-encoding region, which would prevent the retrovirus from making full-length envelope protein recognizable by cell-surface receptors of the virus. The endogenous viruses were physically mapped in Westran pigs by FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation) using PERV-A and PERV-B envelope clones as probes. Preliminary FISH data suggest that there are at least 22 PERVs (13 PERV-A and 9 PERV-B) and the chromosomal locations of these in the Westran strain are quite different from European Large White pigs. The sequences and mapping results of inbred Westran pig suggest that there are relatively few PERV integration sites compared with commercial pigs and further that a large proportion of clones are defective due to premature stop codons in the envelope gene. To investigate the relationship of endogenous retroviruses in peccaries and pigs, a set of degenerate primers was used to amplify peccary retroviral sequences. The sequences of two putative retroviral clones showed close homology, albeit with a 534 bp deletion, to mouse and pig retroviral sequences. Also, four non-target sequences were amplified from peccary with the degenerate retroviral primers. They are a part of the peccary cofilin gene, a SINE, and a sequence containing a microsatellite. The peccary endogenous retroviral sequences are significant in that they are the first such sequences reported in peccary species and repudiate old claims in the literature that peccaries do not have C-type retroviral sequences.
|
4 |
Evaluierung der biologischen Sicherheit von XenotransplantatenIrgang, Markus 05 July 2005 (has links)
Einleitung: Die im Genom der Schweine integrierten porzinen endogenen Retroviren (PERV) gehören zu den potentiellen humanpathogenen Erregern, die eines der Risiken bei der Xenotransplantation darstellen. Für die Abschätzung des Infektionsrisikos von PERV sind drei Verfahrensweisen von Bedeutung: Erstens die Evaluierung der PERV-Freisetzung aus porzinen Zellen und Geweben; Zweitens die Etablierung eines In vivo-Infektionsmodells und Drittens ein retrospektives Screenen von Patienten. Methoden: Die PERV-Expression in Inselzellen von Schweinen der Deutschen Landrasse wurde in vitro und in vivo evaluiert. Anschließend wurde PERV auf nicht-humanen Primatenzellen passagiert. In einem zweiten Modellversuch wurde murinen Zellen in vitro und SCID-Mäusen in vivo zellfreies PERV appliziert. Schließlich wurden Seren von Patienten analysiert. Ergebnisse: Die untersuchten Inselzellen setzten keine Viruspartikel frei und konnten somit weder humane Zellen noch BALB/c-Mäuse infizieren. Die verwendeten Affenzellen produzierten infektiöses PERV mit geringer Replikation. Weder in den murinen Modellversuchen noch in den untersuchten Patienten wurde eine Übertragung von PERV beobachtet. Schlussfolgerung: Schweine der Deutschen Landrasse könnten als Ausgangsbasis für die Zucht sicherer Schweine für die Xenotransplantation dienen. Da keine Infektion verschiedener muriner Zellen mit PERV beobachtet wurde, muss angenommen werden, dass Publikationen anderer Arbeitsgruppen, die eine PERV-Infektion in SCID-Mäusen diagnostizierten, ein falsch-positives Ergebnis aufgrund von Mikrochimärismus oder aufgrund von Pseudotypisierungen mit murinen endogenen Retroviren wiedergeben. Unsere Befunde werden dadurch erhärtet, dass der Rezeptor für PERV-A auf murinen Zellen nicht exprimiert wird und diese auch in vitro nicht infiziert werden konnten. In Übereinstimmung mit den weltweit etwa 200 behandelten Patienten konnte auch in den beiden neuen Studien keine Übertragung von PERV festgestellt werden. / Objective: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are integrated in the porcine genome and are able to infect human cells in vitro. Therefore, PERVs are one of the possible pathogens which poses a risk for xenotransplantations. In this study three significant methods were used to evaluate the infectious risk of PERV: The release of PERV particles from porcine cells and tissues, the formation of an in vivo infection model and a retrospective screening of patients. Methods: Islet cells from german landrace pigs were co-cultivated with human cells in vitro and were transplanted in BALB/c mice in vivo. Serial passaging experiments were performed with nonhuman primate cells. Murine cells were incubated in vitro and SCID mice in vivo with PERV. Sera of patients who were treated ex vivo with porcine liver cells and who had received islet cells were investigated for antibodies against PERV. Results: No virus release were observed in german landrace islet cells, thus they were neither able to infect human cells nor BALB/c mice. The used nonhuman primate cells released low replicating PERVs. None of the murine cells could be infected by PERV and no provirus integration was observed in different SCID mice organs. PERV-specific antibodies were found in none of the investigated patients. Conclusion: German landrace pigs could be used as a source for breeding safe genetically modified pigs suitable for xenotransplantation. Since there were no detectable PERV infection of different murine cells and SCID mice, it have to be supposed, that previously reported PERV transmissions to SCID mice might be due to microchimerism or to pseudotyping of murine endogenous retroviruses. Our results were confirmed by the fact, that the receptor for PERV-A is not expressed on murine cells and that these cells could not be infected in vitro. The absence of a PERV transmission in the investigated patients, correspond to the results obtained from approximately twohundred treated patients worldwide.
|
5 |
Islet Xenotransplantation : An Experimental Study of Barriers to Clinical Transplantation / Xenotransplantation av Langerhanska öar : Experimentiella studier av hinder för klinisk tillämpningSchmidt, Peter January 2004 (has links)
<p>In the field of transplantation, the increasing deficit of human donors have lead to an interest in animals as an alternative source of organs and tissues. </p><p>Different <i>in vitro </i>systems and rodent models of xenotransplantation were used to examine the most significant barriers that have to be overcome, before isolated islets of Langerhans from pigs can be used as a cure for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in humans.</p><p>In clinical transplantation, islets are infused into the liver through the portal vein. During this procedure the islets are susceptible to harmful innate reactions triggered in blood. Adenoviral vectors generating transgenic expression of human complement regulatory proteins were evaluated in pig islets and shown to confer protection against acute complement-mediated damage. </p><p>Transplanted islets escaping this immediate destruction will be targets of a cellular immune response. Using a new mouse model of islet xenograft rejection, it was demonstrated that macrophages, effector cells in the rejection, were part of an MHC-restricted xenospecific immune response mediated by T cells. In a strain of knockout mice it was further shown that this process can proceed in the absence of an important signalling system, mediated by Toll-like receptors, between cells in innate and adaptive immunity. These findings illustrate some of the mechanistic differences compared to cellular islet allograft rejection which partly explain why immunosuppressive drugs used in clinical allotransplantation is not sufficient for preventing xenograft rejection. </p><p>Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) remain a safety concern in xenotransplantation. Characterization of PERV in pig islets indicated that virus expression is low <i>in vitro </i>but increases during the immediate time period following transplantation. This suggests that antiviral therapies administered at the time of transplantation could be used for preventing the risk of PERV transmission after xenotransplantation.</p>
|
6 |
Islet Xenotransplantation : An Experimental Study of Barriers to Clinical Transplantation / Xenotransplantation av Langerhanska öar : Experimentiella studier av hinder för klinisk tillämpningSchmidt, Peter January 2004 (has links)
In the field of transplantation, the increasing deficit of human donors have lead to an interest in animals as an alternative source of organs and tissues. Different in vitro systems and rodent models of xenotransplantation were used to examine the most significant barriers that have to be overcome, before isolated islets of Langerhans from pigs can be used as a cure for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in humans. In clinical transplantation, islets are infused into the liver through the portal vein. During this procedure the islets are susceptible to harmful innate reactions triggered in blood. Adenoviral vectors generating transgenic expression of human complement regulatory proteins were evaluated in pig islets and shown to confer protection against acute complement-mediated damage. Transplanted islets escaping this immediate destruction will be targets of a cellular immune response. Using a new mouse model of islet xenograft rejection, it was demonstrated that macrophages, effector cells in the rejection, were part of an MHC-restricted xenospecific immune response mediated by T cells. In a strain of knockout mice it was further shown that this process can proceed in the absence of an important signalling system, mediated by Toll-like receptors, between cells in innate and adaptive immunity. These findings illustrate some of the mechanistic differences compared to cellular islet allograft rejection which partly explain why immunosuppressive drugs used in clinical allotransplantation is not sufficient for preventing xenograft rejection. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) remain a safety concern in xenotransplantation. Characterization of PERV in pig islets indicated that virus expression is low in vitro but increases during the immediate time period following transplantation. This suggests that antiviral therapies administered at the time of transplantation could be used for preventing the risk of PERV transmission after xenotransplantation.
|
Page generated in 0.0714 seconds