Ácaros tetraniquídeos são considerados pragas secundárias em soja, no entanto, nos últimos anos, foram registrados ataques severos e freqüentes destes em diferentes regiões produtoras do Brasil. Experimentos foram realizados em campo e laboratório com o objetivo de estudar os fatores determinantes dos aumentos populacionais de ácaros tetraniquídeos em soja. Para determinar se cultivares transgênicas de soja seriam mais susceptíveis aos ácaros, foi estudado o ciclo biológico e a tabela de vida dos ácaros Mononychellus planki (McGregor) e Tetranychus urticae Koch em três cultivares de soja transgênicas, glifosato-tolerante, e três não-transgênicas com elevada semelhança genética às respectivas cultivares transgênicas. Testes de toxicidade foram realizados em laboratório com agrotóxicos comumente utilizados em soja para determinar os efeitos destes sobre importantes inimigos naturais dos ácaros tetraniquídeos e das lagartas da soja, os fungos Neozygites floridana e Nomuraea rileyi, respectivamente. Em campo, durante duas safras agrícolas (2007/2008 e 2008/2009), foi estudado o efeito de cinco manejos fitossanitários sobre a flutuação populacional de ácaros tetraniquídeos, lagartas, percevejos fitófagos e de alguns de seus inimigos naturais. As cultivares transgênicas não afetaram significativamente o ciclo biológico de M. planki e T. urticae e as pequenas diferenças observadas para alguns parâmetros da tabela de vida destas espécies entre cultivares não estão relacionadas à modificação genética. A avaliação do efeito dos agrotóxicos sobre os patógenos revelou que o fungicida Alto 100 e o herbicida Roundup Ready inibiram o crescimento micelial de N. rileyi. Para N. floridana todos os fungicidas contendo estrubirulinas inibiram completamente a esporulação, enquanto que os produtos do grupo dos triazóis resultaram em taxas intermediárias de esporulação e germinação de conídios. A espécie M. planki foi mais abundante do que T. urticae em campo. O ácaro predador Neoseiulus anonymus e o fungo N. floridana foram os inimigos naturais associados a estes ácaros pragas. Os fungicidas Priori Xtra e Alto 100 reduziram a prevalência de N. floridana, mas não interferiram na dinâmica de N. anonymus. O inseticida piretróide Decis 25 EC reduziu a densidade deste predador, mas não afetou o fungo. No tratamento onde foram aplicados os fungicidas com o inseticida observou-se aumentos populacionais de ácaros fitófagos. A pulverização do herbicida glifosato não afetou N. anonymus e N. floridana, e a presença de plantas daninhas favoreceu o predador. Os picos populacionais mais elevados de Anticarsia gemmatalis foram observados em 2008/09, nas parcelas onde foram empregados fungicidas, e maiores densidades de Pseudoplusia includens foram observadas no tratamento com Decis 25 EC. A aplicação deste inseticida também afetou negativamente a densidade de insetos predadores e resultou em maiores densidades de percevejos fitófagos. O herbicida glifosato não afetou a densidade de pragas e inimigos naturais, no entanto, a presença de plantas daninhas favoreceu os insetos predadores e desfavoreceu os percevejos fitófagos. Em geral, os estudos em campo indicam que o uso de fungicidas e inseticidas são fatores associados aos aumentos populacionais de ácaros em soja. / Spider mites are secondary pests of soybean, however, recently outbreaks has frequently been reported on different producing regions of Brazil. Experiments were carried out in field and laboratory aiming to determine the main factors associates with spider mite outbreaks in soybean. To determine if genetically modified (GM) soybean varieties are more susceptible to spider mites, the life cycle and life table of the mites Mononychellus planki and Tetranychus urticae was studied on three GM soybean cultivars glyphosate-tolerant and three non-transgenic cultivars genetically similar to the transgenic ones. Toxicological tests were carried out in laboratory with pesticides commonly used in soybean to determine the pesticide effect on important natural enemies of spider mites and soybean catterpillars, the fungi Neozygites floridana and Nomuraea rileyi, respectively. In the field during two growing seasons (2007/2008 and 2008/2009), the effects of five plant protection managements were studied on the population dynamics of spider mites, caterpillars, stink bugs and some of their natural enemies. The transgenic cultivars did not significantly affect the life cycle parameters of M. planki e T. urticae and differences observed for some life table parameters between cultivars are not related to the genetic modification. Evaluation of the effect of pesticides on the pathogens showed that the fungicide Alto 100 and the herbicide Roundup Ready inhibited the mycelial growth of N. rileyi. Against N. floridana, all fungicides with strobilurins completely inhibited sporulation, while the triazole products hence showed intermediate rates of sporulation and conidia germination. The spider mite M. planki was more abundant than T. urticae in the field. The predatory mite Neoseiulus anonymus and the fungus N. floridana were the main natural enemies associated to these mite pests. The fungicides Priori Xtra and Alto 100 reduced the prevalence of N. floridana, though this pesticide did not negatively affected N. anonymus. The pyrethroid insecticide Decis 25 EC reduced the density of this predator, but did not affect the fungus. The treatment where fungicides and the insecticide were applied, increases on populations of phytophagous mites were observed. Spraying of the herbicide glyphosate did not affect N. anonymus and N. floridana, and the presence of weeds favored the predator. Higher population peaks of Anticarsia gemmatalis were associated with fungicide applications in 2008/09 and higher densities of Pseudoplusia includens were observed in treatment with Decis 25 EC. This insecticide also negatively affected the density of predatory insects and resulted on higher densities of stink bugs. The herbicide glyphosate did not affect density of pests and natural enemies; however, the presence of weeds favored insect predators, and resulted on lower populations of stink bugs. Overall, the field studies indicate that the use of fungicides and insecticides are important factors associated to spider mite outbreaks in soybean.

Ácaros tetraniquídeos são considerados pragas secundárias em soja, no entanto, nos últimos anos, foram registrados ataques severos e freqüentes destes em diferentes regiões produtoras do Brasil. Experimentos foram realizados em campo e laboratório com o objetivo de estudar os fatores determinantes dos aumentos populacionais de ácaros tetraniquídeos em soja. Para determinar se cultivares transgênicas de soja seriam mais susceptíveis aos ácaros, foi estudado o ciclo biológico e a tabela de vida dos ácaros Mononychellus planki (McGregor) e Tetranychus urticae Koch em três cultivares de soja transgênicas, glifosato-tolerante, e três não-transgênicas com elevada semelhança genética às respectivas cultivares transgênicas. Testes de toxicidade foram realizados em laboratório com agrotóxicos comumente utilizados em soja para determinar os efeitos destes sobre importantes inimigos naturais dos ácaros tetraniquídeos e das lagartas da soja, os fungos Neozygites floridana e Nomuraea rileyi, respectivamente. Em campo, durante duas safras agrícolas (2007/2008 e 2008/2009), foi estudado o efeito de cinco manejos fitossanitários sobre a flutuação populacional de ácaros tetraniquídeos, lagartas, percevejos fitófagos e de alguns de seus inimigos naturais. As cultivares transgênicas não afetaram significativamente o ciclo biológico de M. planki e T. urticae e as pequenas diferenças observadas para alguns parâmetros da tabela de vida destas espécies entre cultivares não estão relacionadas à modificação genética. A avaliação do efeito dos agrotóxicos sobre os patógenos revelou que o fungicida Alto 100 e o herbicida Roundup Ready inibiram o crescimento micelial de N. rileyi. Para N. floridana todos os fungicidas contendo estrubirulinas inibiram completamente a esporulação, enquanto que os produtos do grupo dos triazóis resultaram em taxas intermediárias de esporulação e germinação de conídios. A espécie M. planki foi mais abundante do que T. urticae em campo. O ácaro predador Neoseiulus anonymus e o fungo N. floridana foram os inimigos naturais associados a estes ácaros pragas. Os fungicidas Priori Xtra e Alto 100 reduziram a prevalência de N. floridana, mas não interferiram na dinâmica de N. anonymus. O inseticida piretróide Decis 25 EC reduziu a densidade deste predador, mas não afetou o fungo. No tratamento onde foram aplicados os fungicidas com o inseticida observou-se aumentos populacionais de ácaros fitófagos. A pulverização do herbicida glifosato não afetou N. anonymus e N. floridana, e a presença de plantas daninhas favoreceu o predador. Os picos populacionais mais elevados de Anticarsia gemmatalis foram observados em 2008/09, nas parcelas onde foram empregados fungicidas, e maiores densidades de Pseudoplusia includens foram observadas no tratamento com Decis 25 EC. A aplicação deste inseticida também afetou negativamente a densidade de insetos predadores e resultou em maiores densidades de percevejos fitófagos. O herbicida glifosato não afetou a densidade de pragas e inimigos naturais, no entanto, a presença de plantas daninhas favoreceu os insetos predadores e desfavoreceu os percevejos fitófagos. Em geral, os estudos em campo indicam que o uso de fungicidas e inseticidas são fatores associados aos aumentos populacionais de ácaros em soja. / Spider mites are secondary pests of soybean, however, recently outbreaks has frequently been reported on different producing regions of Brazil. Experiments were carried out in field and laboratory aiming to determine the main factors associates with spider mite outbreaks in soybean. To determine if genetically modified (GM) soybean varieties are more susceptible to spider mites, the life cycle and life table of the mites Mononychellus planki and Tetranychus urticae was studied on three GM soybean cultivars glyphosate-tolerant and three non-transgenic cultivars genetically similar to the transgenic ones. Toxicological tests were carried out in laboratory with pesticides commonly used in soybean to determine the pesticide effect on important natural enemies of spider mites and soybean catterpillars, the fungi Neozygites floridana and Nomuraea rileyi, respectively. In the field during two growing seasons (2007/2008 and 2008/2009), the effects of five plant protection managements were studied on the population dynamics of spider mites, caterpillars, stink bugs and some of their natural enemies. The transgenic cultivars did not significantly affect the life cycle parameters of M. planki e T. urticae and differences observed for some life table parameters between cultivars are not related to the genetic modification. Evaluation of the effect of pesticides on the pathogens showed that the fungicide Alto 100 and the herbicide Roundup Ready inhibited the mycelial growth of N. rileyi. Against N. floridana, all fungicides with strobilurins completely inhibited sporulation, while the triazole products hence showed intermediate rates of sporulation and conidia germination. The spider mite M. planki was more abundant than T. urticae in the field. The predatory mite Neoseiulus anonymus and the fungus N. floridana were the main natural enemies associated to these mite pests. The fungicides Priori Xtra and Alto 100 reduced the prevalence of N. floridana, though this pesticide did not negatively affected N. anonymus. The pyrethroid insecticide Decis 25 EC reduced the density of this predator, but did not affect the fungus. The treatment where fungicides and the insecticide were applied, increases on populations of phytophagous mites were observed. Spraying of the herbicide glyphosate did not affect N. anonymus and N. floridana, and the presence of weeds favored the predator. Higher population peaks of Anticarsia gemmatalis were associated with fungicide applications in 2008/09 and higher densities of Pseudoplusia includens were observed in treatment with Decis 25 EC. This insecticide also negatively affected the density of predatory insects and resulted on higher densities of stink bugs. The herbicide glyphosate did not affect density of pests and natural enemies; however, the presence of weeds favored insect predators, and resulted on lower populations of stink bugs. Overall, the field studies indicate that the use of fungicides and insecticides are important factors associated to spider mite outbreaks in soybean.

Odour plays an important role in many predator/prey interactions. In the northern hemisphere, many mammalian prey species have been shown to respond to predator odours. It is also widely assumed that mammalian predators utilise odours to locate their prey. This thesis explores the importance of odour in Australian mammalian predator/prey interactions. Responses of native Australian species to the faecal odour of two predators; the native tiger quoll Dasyurus maculatus and the introduced red fox Vulpes vulpes, were evaluated through live-trapping and focussed behavioural studies of captive animals. Tiger quoll responses to prey olfactory cues were investigated in a captive experiment. Native rodents (bush rats Rattus fuscipes, swamp rats R. lutreolus and eastern chestnut mice Pseudomys gracilicaudatus) equally avoided traps scented with either quoll or fox faeces, and in captive experiments, bush rats and swamp rats reduced their average speed in response to both predator odours. Of the marsupial species, northern brown bandicoots Isoodon macrourus and common brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula were captured more frequently in quoll-scented traps than unscented traps or foxscented traps, while captures of brown antechinus Antechinus stuarttii, long-nosed bandicoots Perameles nasuta and southern brown bandicoot I. obesulus were unaffected by the either predator odour. In captive experiments, brown antechinus, long-nosed and northern brown bandicoots decreased their foraging in response to both predator odours, and spent less time in areas scented with quoll faeces. Tiger quolls didn't appear to detect odour sources from a distance of >65 cm, but they did follow scent trails and spent more time in areas scented with the urine and faeces of potential prey. Chemical analysis revealed no common components in fox and quoll odour which prey species could be responding to. Therefore, these native species have evolved to respond to fox odour since foxes were introduced to Australia 130 years ago. The stronger response of native rodents to fox odour may be a legacy of their co-evolution with canid predators prior to entering Australia. A better understanding of how odour is utilised in Australian predator/prey interactions may lead to a greater ability to protect Australia's unique mammalian fauna from introduced predators.

The backbone of this study was a systems thinking based analysis of the management and control of predators as practiced in South Africa since the advent of Europeans in 1652. The first bounties were introduced for a variety of animal species in 1656. Many species became labeled as vermin and were persecuted, often with the intention of eradication. A variety of controls have been applied, of which many have not kept pace with contemporary thinking or technology, and which by simply killing predators fail to address the crux of the issue of predator – livestock conflict. Many of the methods used cannot be applied to specifically remove an individual damage-causing animal. Considerable collateral ecological damage is inflicted by the killing of animals regarded as innocent bystanders. The objective of the analysis was to highlight the futility of temporary solutions which fail to resolve the conflict in the long term. These quick fixes frequently perpetuate an ecological imbalance which exacerbates the predator – livestock conflict. The analysis used raw data from a questionnaire survey conducted by the Poison Working Group of the Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT-PWG) (2003). The EWT-PWG intended to assess pesticide abuse as toxicant for predators by farmers, and to identify all control methods used. The data forthcoming was Cartesian in nature and a fixed snap-shot in time. This study sought to identify the root cause of the conflict by applying systems thinking which added the dimension of cause and effect interrogation. The study categorised and described predator conflict management methods as lethal or preventative, and assessed each category in archetypal terms from a systems thinking perspective. It also sought to identify leverage points, or small changes which have profound effects, to stimulate a change in approach to humanpredator conflict management. In order to assess and illustrate the positive change brought about by application of preventative methods, a small group of farmers who had initiated changes in their predator conflict management over the five years subsequent to the EWTPWG survey were selected from the original group for reassessment. Through evaluation of predator conflict management methods from a systems thinking perspective, and by probing learning processes, the shortcomings or failure of inappropriate management responses to conflict situations were shown to exacerbate conflicts. Contrarily, it was illustrated that application of systems thinking and a process of addressing the root cause of conflict issues in predator conflict management, was a longer term solution. The study illustrated that application of long term proactive prevention and conflict avoidance principles, can offer long term solutions for predator conflict managers. / Thesis (M.Env.Dev.) - University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2008.

Odour plays an important role in many predator/prey interactions. In the northern hemisphere, many mammalian prey species have been shown to respond to predator odours. It is also widely assumed that mammalian predators utilise odours to locate their prey. This thesis explores the importance of odour in Australian mammalian predator/prey interactions. Responses of native Australian species to the faecal odour of two predators; the native tiger quoll Dasyurus maculatus and the introduced red fox Vulpes vulpes, were evaluated through live-trapping and focussed behavioural studies of captive animals. Tiger quoll responses to prey olfactory cues were investigated in a captive experiment. Native rodents (bush rats Rattus fuscipes, swamp rats R. lutreolus and eastern chestnut mice Pseudomys gracilicaudatus) equally avoided traps scented with either quoll or fox faeces, and in captive experiments, bush rats and swamp rats reduced their average speed in response to both predator odours. Of the marsupial species, northern brown bandicoots Isoodon macrourus and common brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula were captured more frequently in quoll-scented traps than unscented traps or foxscented traps, while captures of brown antechinus Antechinus stuarttii, long-nosed bandicoots Perameles nasuta and southern brown bandicoot I. obesulus were unaffected by the either predator odour. In captive experiments, brown antechinus, long-nosed and northern brown bandicoots decreased their foraging in response to both predator odours, and spent less time in areas scented with quoll faeces. Tiger quolls didn't appear to detect odour sources from a distance of >65 cm, but they did follow scent trails and spent more time in areas scented with the urine and faeces of potential prey. Chemical analysis revealed no common components in fox and quoll odour which prey species could be responding to. Therefore, these native species have evolved to respond to fox odour since foxes were introduced to Australia 130 years ago. The stronger response of native rodents to fox odour may be a legacy of their co-evolution with canid predators prior to entering Australia. A better understanding of how odour is utilised in Australian predator/prey interactions may lead to a greater ability to protect Australia's unique mammalian fauna from introduced predators.

Odour plays an important role in many predator/prey interactions. In the northern hemisphere, many mammalian prey species have been shown to respond to predator odours. It is also widely assumed that mammalian predators utilise odours to locate their prey. This thesis explores the importance of odour in Australian mammalian predator/prey interactions. Responses of native Australian species to the faecal odour of two predators; the native tiger quoll Dasyurus maculatus and the introduced red fox Vulpes vulpes, were evaluated through live-trapping and focussed behavioural studies of captive animals. Tiger quoll responses to prey olfactory cues were investigated in a captive experiment. Native rodents (bush rats Rattus fuscipes, swamp rats R. lutreolus and eastern chestnut mice Pseudomys gracilicaudatus) equally avoided traps scented with either quoll or fox faeces, and in captive experiments, bush rats and swamp rats reduced their average speed in response to both predator odours. Of the marsupial species, northern brown bandicoots Isoodon macrourus and common brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula were captured more frequently in quoll-scented traps than unscented traps or foxscented traps, while captures of brown antechinus Antechinus stuarttii, long-nosed bandicoots Perameles nasuta and southern brown bandicoot I. obesulus were unaffected by the either predator odour. In captive experiments, brown antechinus, long-nosed and northern brown bandicoots decreased their foraging in response to both predator odours, and spent less time in areas scented with quoll faeces. Tiger quolls didn't appear to detect odour sources from a distance of >65 cm, but they did follow scent trails and spent more time in areas scented with the urine and faeces of potential prey. Chemical analysis revealed no common components in fox and quoll odour which prey species could be responding to. Therefore, these native species have evolved to respond to fox odour since foxes were introduced to Australia 130 years ago. The stronger response of native rodents to fox odour may be a legacy of their co-evolution with canid predators prior to entering Australia. A better understanding of how odour is utilised in Australian predator/prey interactions may lead to a greater ability to protect Australia's unique mammalian fauna from introduced predators.

Odour plays an important role in many predator/prey interactions. In the northern hemisphere, many mammalian prey species have been shown to respond to predator odours. It is also widely assumed that mammalian predators utilise odours to locate their prey. This thesis explores the importance of odour in Australian mammalian predator/prey interactions. Responses of native Australian species to the faecal odour of two predators; the native tiger quoll Dasyurus maculatus and the introduced red fox Vulpes vulpes, were evaluated through live-trapping and focussed behavioural studies of captive animals. Tiger quoll responses to prey olfactory cues were investigated in a captive experiment. Native rodents (bush rats Rattus fuscipes, swamp rats R. lutreolus and eastern chestnut mice Pseudomys gracilicaudatus) equally avoided traps scented with either quoll or fox faeces, and in captive experiments, bush rats and swamp rats reduced their average speed in response to both predator odours. Of the marsupial species, northern brown bandicoots Isoodon macrourus and common brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula were captured more frequently in quoll-scented traps than unscented traps or foxscented traps, while captures of brown antechinus Antechinus stuarttii, long-nosed bandicoots Perameles nasuta and southern brown bandicoot I. obesulus were unaffected by the either predator odour. In captive experiments, brown antechinus, long-nosed and northern brown bandicoots decreased their foraging in response to both predator odours, and spent less time in areas scented with quoll faeces. Tiger quolls didn't appear to detect odour sources from a distance of >65 cm, but they did follow scent trails and spent more time in areas scented with the urine and faeces of potential prey. Chemical analysis revealed no common components in fox and quoll odour which prey species could be responding to. Therefore, these native species have evolved to respond to fox odour since foxes were introduced to Australia 130 years ago. The stronger response of native rodents to fox odour may be a legacy of their co-evolution with canid predators prior to entering Australia. A better understanding of how odour is utilised in Australian predator/prey interactions may lead to a greater ability to protect Australia's unique mammalian fauna from introduced predators.

Odour plays an important role in many predator/prey interactions. In the northern hemisphere, many mammalian prey species have been shown to respond to predator odours. It is also widely assumed that mammalian predators utilise odours to locate their prey. This thesis explores the importance of odour in Australian mammalian predator/prey interactions. Responses of native Australian species to the faecal odour of two predators; the native tiger quoll Dasyurus maculatus and the introduced red fox Vulpes vulpes, were evaluated through live-trapping and focussed behavioural studies of captive animals. Tiger quoll responses to prey olfactory cues were investigated in a captive experiment. Native rodents (bush rats Rattus fuscipes, swamp rats R. lutreolus and eastern chestnut mice Pseudomys gracilicaudatus) equally avoided traps scented with either quoll or fox faeces, and in captive experiments, bush rats and swamp rats reduced their average speed in response to both predator odours. Of the marsupial species, northern brown bandicoots Isoodon macrourus and common brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula were captured more frequently in quoll-scented traps than unscented traps or foxscented traps, while captures of brown antechinus Antechinus stuarttii, long-nosed bandicoots Perameles nasuta and southern brown bandicoot I. obesulus were unaffected by the either predator odour. In captive experiments, brown antechinus, long-nosed and northern brown bandicoots decreased their foraging in response to both predator odours, and spent less time in areas scented with quoll faeces. Tiger quolls didn't appear to detect odour sources from a distance of >65 cm, but they did follow scent trails and spent more time in areas scented with the urine and faeces of potential prey. Chemical analysis revealed no common components in fox and quoll odour which prey species could be responding to. Therefore, these native species have evolved to respond to fox odour since foxes were introduced to Australia 130 years ago. The stronger response of native rodents to fox odour may be a legacy of their co-evolution with canid predators prior to entering Australia. A better understanding of how odour is utilised in Australian predator/prey interactions may lead to a greater ability to protect Australia's unique mammalian fauna from introduced predators.

[Partial abstract]: Human-wildlife conflict is a widely observed phenomenon and encompasses a range of negative interactions between humans and wildlife. Depredation upon livestock and game species proves to be the prevalent form of this conflict and often results in the killing of carnivores. Within the South African context, despite intense lethal control, two sympatric mesopredators, the blackbacked jackal (Canis mesomelas) and the caracal (Caracal caracal), remain common enough to be considered a major threat to human livelihoods through depredation. Wildlife ranches and livestock farms dominate the landscape in the Eastern Cape Province. Moreover, human-predator conflict within the region is extensive as both the black-backed jackal and caracal are seen to be inimical by landowners. Understanding this conflict is essential for mitigating any potential adverse environmental reactions (i.e. range collapses or extinctions) and requires knowledge of anthropogenic, ecological and environmental factors. I interviewed 73 land owners across five municipal boundaries in the Eastern Cape to quantify perceptions of predator control methods.

MSc (Zoology) / Department of Zoology / See the attached abstract below