Spelling suggestions: "subject:"primaries"" "subject:"primarie""
1 |
The direct primary in NebraskaDebel, Niels H. January 1914 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Nebraska. / Bibliography: p. 109-112.
|
2 |
The direct primary in New JerseyBoots, Ralph Simpson, January 1917 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1917. / Vita. "Bibliography and sources": 2 p. at end.
|
3 |
The primary election system evaluation of an American political institution /Fitzgerald, Timothy M. January 1993 (has links)
Thesis (M.P.A.)--Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, 1993. / Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-06, page: 2940. Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaf 69).
|
4 |
Domination and the vote in a southwestern border community : the 1950 primary campaign in El Paso, Texas /Busey, James Lynn January 1952 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
The John F. Kennedy library oral history project, the West Virginia democratic presidential primary, 1960 /Young, William L. January 1982 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Voters' images of the candidates in the 1984 Ohio presidential primary /Pike, Gary Robert January 1985 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The making of a public: a participant observation study of audience formation in a gubernatorial primary /Barkin, Steve Michael January 1979 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
The John F. Kennedy library oral history project, the West Virginia democratic presidential primary, 1960 /Young, William L., January 1982 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University. / Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 158-160). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center.
|
9 |
The Causes and Consequences of Congressional Endorsements in Presidential PrimariesAnderson, Christopher 16 December 2013 (has links)
Little is known about why elected officials choose to get involved in presidential nomination struggles. Recent research argues that elected officials have a collective incentive to nominate an electorally viable and ideologically unifying candidate. Yet, elected officials must balance these collective incentives with their own personal considerations (e.g., reelection motives, policy interests, ambition, ideology) that may either foster or inhibit their ability to act on their collective desire to nominate viable, ideologically unifying candidates. Further, this research then determines the extent to which elected officials are rewarded-or punished- for getting involved during the presidential nomination process. In particular, interparty differences between the Republican and Democratic coalitions predict that Republicans, but not Democrats, will be rewarded for attempting to lead intraparty nomination struggles. Finally, this research links the aggregate-level findings that endorsements from elected officials are important determinants of nomination outcomes to the individual level by arguing that elected officials' endorsements mobilize their constituents to get involved in politics. In particular, as the mobilization process targets those who are already likely to participate in the first place, endorsements during presidential primaries leads to differential participation in politics. In sum, this research provides individual level foundations for the causes and consequences of congressional endorsements in presidential nomination contests.
|
10 |
John F. Kennedy and West Virginia, 1960-1963Ponton, Anthony W. January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Marshall University, 2004. / Title from document title page. Includes abstract. Document formatted into pages; contains 86 p. Includes bibliographical references (p. 78-86).
|
Page generated in 0.052 seconds