The aim of the work is comparison of the primitivists’ art and the children’s art (6 – 11 years old), with the purpose to point theirs similarities in different artistically aspects. Looking at the child like at the artist is not a new attitude, but the attitude, that the children’s art is an aesthetical value came just at XX c. Till our days the children’s art was researched by psychology, pedagogy, philosophy even medicine attitude, but not art. Then adults are looking at children’s drawings they seem imperfect, naïve and primitive. Such naïve, spontaneous, playful attitude to the world, a childish slant and rendering of reality is very similar to primitivism artists. The children’s pictorial activity and primitivists art was researched like two different art’s districts. So I think this subject is actual and important. The creation of primitivism artists is a proof that we can see and treat the world not even by academic art rules. The original viewpoint which comes from subconsciousness to objects, surrounding covers the new opportunity to interpret the nature. The children’s pictorial activity is the important game form during it child reveals his physical development, moral condition, outlook. It is a natural child’s dependence which comes from subconsciousness. Each child’s individual, creative conception of reality and reflection in works, drawings has right to exist. Questionnaires’ materials show that teachers of primary classes are conversant... [to full text]