Not available / text

Not available / text

The aim of this study is to analyse how mathematical problem solving (MPS) is represented in mathematical textbooks for Swedish upper secondary school. The analysis comprises dominating Swedish textbook series, and relates to uncovering a) the quantity of tasks that are actually mathematical problems (MPs), b) their location in the chapter, c) their difficulty level, and d) their context. Based on an analysis of 5,722 tasks from the area of calculus, it is concluded that the textbooks themselves contain very few tasks that can be defined as MPs, and that those that are MPs are found at the end of a chapter at the most difficult level, and are presented in a pure mathematical context. Implications are discussed.

Previous studies have sought to investigate the effects of rumination and distraction on social problem-solving, mood and confidence of dysphoric and depressed individuals. The current study is aimed at extending this literature by examining the effects of rumination on parental problem-solving, mood and problem-solving confidence among dysphoric post-natal women. Fifty-nine post-natal women took part in the study and were allocated to either the dysphoric or control group based upon the Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (Cox, Holden & Sagovsky, 1987). Women were asked to complete measures of mood, confidence and four problem-solving tasks following a rumination or distraction mood induction. Results indicated that dysphoric post-natal women induced to ruminate showed poorer problemsolving and lower mood than dysphoric women induced to distract and non-dysphoric women induced to distract or ruminate. No significant differences were seen in reported confidence levels for dysphoric post-natal women induced to ruminate than dysphoric women induced to distract and non-dysphoric women induced to distract or ruminate. Consideration is given to the clinical implications of these findings as well as the limitations and possibilities for future research.

The study analyzed the impact of a social skills intervention pogram with adolescent students with learning disabilities attending a school for dyslexia in central Texas. Participants of the study were 8 students aged 11 through 13. Participants were equally assigned to the intervention and control groups based on their schedules. A six-session social skills intervention program was provided to students in the intervention condition during their enrichment hours, while the control students continued to attend their regular classroom activities during this period. Non-parametric test statistics (Wilcoxon signed-rank Test and Mann Whitney U) were utilized to assess within group differences from pre- to post-test and between group differences, respectively. The results of the study suggested that even though no statistically significant differences between control and intervention groups were observed at the pre-test, scores on the Social Problem Solving Inventory-Adolescent, at post-test indicated that the intervention group significantly outperformed the control group. Neither the control nor the intervention group demonstrated any significant improvement from pre- to post-test. / text

published_or_final_version / abstract / Education / Master / Master of Education

No description available.

Η παρούσα εργασία έχει ως θέμα τη μαθηματική απόδειξη και την διαδικασία επίλυσης προβλήματος. Στόχος της είναι αρχικά, να παρουσιάσει το θεωρητικό υπόβαθρο που διέπει αυτά τα δύο θέματα και να κάνει μια σύγκριση ώστε να αναδειχθούν οι διαφορές τους και οι ομοιότητες τους. Στην συνέχεια, γίνεται μια σύντομη παρουσίαση των Αναλυτικών Προγραμμάτων και των διδακτικών εγχειριδίων των Μαθηματικών του Λυκείου για το χρονικό διάστημα από τα τέλη της δεκαετίας του 1980 έως σήμερα έχοντας ως κύριο άξονα, την απόδειξη και την επίλυση προβλήματος. Κατόπιν, με την βοήθεια μιας δραστηριότητας κατάλληλα διαμορφωμένης εξετάζετε ο ρόλος των παραπάνω στους μαθητές και τέλος, γίνετε μια σύντομη ανάλυση της Γραμμικής και Δομικής μορφής της απόδειξης, όπως αυτή είχε προταθεί από τον Uri Leron και μια συγκριτική παρουσίαση των αποδείξεων κάποιων θεωρημάτων του σχολικού βιβλίου της Γεωμετρίας της Α΄ Λυκείου (Αργυρόπουλος Η.) και με τις δύο μορφές. / The objective of this Master Thesis is the presentation of the Mathematical Proof and Problem Solving. Its aim is initially to present the theoretical background behind these two issues and a comparison between the Mathematical Proof and Problem Solving with respect to their similarities and differences takes place. Then a brief presentation of the curriculum programs as well as the school books of mathematics is given. This presentation is about the time period from the late decade of 1980 up to date, mostly concerning the Mathematical Proof and Problem Solving. Moreover, using a suitably formulated activity, the role of the above over the students is studied. Finally, a concise analysis of Linear and Structural style of proof as it suggested by Uri Leron is given. The thesis is completed with the presentation of three theorems along with their proofs (Linear style) as they are stated in the section of "Inequality Relationships" of Geometry school book of A Lyceum class (Αργυρόπουλος Η. 2008), while for each proof its Structural style is also given.

No description available.

Previous research on the scientific creativity of children has been limited. The most salient limitations of previous literature have been: (a) narrowness of theoretical frameworks, (b) limitedness in using a variety of science process skills, (c) ignorance of the gender differences in scientific creativity, and (d) ignorance of elementary school students. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Scientific Creativity Test for fifth-grade students to identify scientific creativity in those students. A related purpose was to investigate the gender differences in scientific creativity. The Scientific Creativity Test consisted of three subtests: Problems and Solutions, Grouping of Flowers, and Design an Experiment. The test was administered to 138 fifth-grade students from six different elementary schools. The reliability analysis showed that the Scientific Creativity Test had a .89 coefficient as a consistency of scores. The concurrent validity analysis indicated that the Scientific Creativity Test had medium correlations with Teachers' Ratings of students' Scientific Ability (r = .42), Science Content Knowledge (r = .42), and Scientific Creativity (r = .51). The interrater reliability of the three items rated by two independent raters [1C (designing a construction about a solution), 2D (drawing a diagram about the relationships among the groups of flowers), and 3B (drawing an experiment to develop a solution for the environmental problem)], using the Consensual Assessment Technique showed medium to high correlations. The General Linear Modeling (GLM) Repeated Measures Two-Way Analysis of Variance indicated no overall significant differences between males and females. An interaction effect, however, was found. Females performed better than males in Subtest II (Grouping of Flowers) and slightly better in Subtest III (Design an Experiment). The analysis using the independent-samples t test indicated no significant differences between females and males in the scientific creativity test except in four items: 2A (grouping flowers) Fluency, 2A Flexibility, 2A Originality, and 2A Complexity. These differences were in favor of females. The findings present support of the psychometric properties of the Scientific Creativity Test in the identification of scientific creativity in children.