Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-07-17T13:14:38Z No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscaDeFatimaDoNascimentoSilva_TESE.pdf: 4413362 bytes, checksum: e0033cfcbd51c0cdcb5f93d10f64d5d3 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-07-19T11:55:55Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscaDeFatimaDoNascimentoSilva_TESE.pdf: 4413362 bytes, checksum: e0033cfcbd51c0cdcb5f93d10f64d5d3 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-19T11:55:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FranciscaDeFatimaDoNascimentoSilva_TESE.pdf: 4413362 bytes, checksum: e0033cfcbd51c0cdcb5f93d10f64d5d3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-06 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / O desenvolvimento de um campo petrol?fero pode ser entendido como o conjunto de a??es necess?rias para colocar o campo em produ??o: perfura??es, sistemas de inje??o, plataformas, etc. A forma como ser? feito este desenvolvimento define uma ou mais alternativas. Assim, definir alternativas de desenvolvimento de um campo petrol?fero ? uma das tarefas mais importantes na ?rea de reservat?rios, dado que estas defini??es afetam o comportamento do reservat?rio, decis?es futuras, an?lises econ?micas e, consequentemente, a atratividade resultante dos projetos definidos. Este trabalho apresenta a implementa??o de um sistema otimizador multiobjetivo baseado no algoritmo gen?tico NSGA-II (Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm), que oferece uma ferramenta de suporte ? decis?o e automatiza a busca de alternativas para o desenvolvimento de campos petrol?feros submetidos ao processo de inje??o de ?gua. Cada alternativa refere-se ? forma como um campo petrol?fero, conhecido e delimitado, ? colocado em produ??o, isto ?, diz respeito ? determina??o do n?mero e a disposi??o dos po?os produtores e injetores no campo. A aplica??o do algoritmo consiste em encontrar as configura??es de produ??o que, em longo prazo, forne?am o maior Valor Presente L?quido (VPL), obtido a partir do custo de investimento inicial, do pre?o do petr?leo, da produ??o de ?leo e dos custos de opera??o pagos durante o tempo de produ??o, ou seja, a condi??o operacional mais vi?vel economicamente, reduzindo o tempo do processo de tomada de decis?o. Com os resultados apresentados foi poss?vel observar que em v?rios casos as aplica??es das linhas de a??o possibilitaram aumentos significativos no VPL e no Fator de Recupera??o ao final do projeto. Considerando o Caso_36 de dimens?o de malha de 300m, o Fator de Recupera??o aumentou de 45,66% para 50,24%, um aumento de quase 5 pontos percentuais no volume de ?leo recuperado. Diante do exposto, observa-se que as interven??es operacionais de alterar (aumentar ou diminuir) a vaz?o de inje??o de ?gua inicial ou mudar o layout de malha no campo melhoram a rentabilidade, reduzindo os custos com a inje??o de ?gua, tratamento e descarte da ?gua produzida, aumentando o tempo de viabilidade do projeto. Por outro lado, ? importante destacar tamb?m que, em alguns casos, ao aplicar as linhas de a??o, o Fator de recupera??o final ? menor, mas ainda sim as redu??es dos custos operacionais viabilizam a opera??o. / The development of an oil field can be understood as the set of actions necessary to put the field into production: drilling, injection systems, platforms, etc. This development the way will be made defines an alternative. Set a development of an oil field alternative is one of the most important tasks in the reservoir area, given that this definition affects the reservoir behavior, future decisions, economic analysis and consequently the resulting attractiveness of the defined project. This paper presents the implementation of a system based on genetic algorithm multiobjective optimizer NSGA-II (Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm), which offers a decision support tool and automates the search for alternatives to the development of the oilfield submitted to water injection process. Each alternative refers to how an oil field, known and defined, is put into production, that is, with respect to the determination of number and the disposition of producers wells and injectors in the field. The implementation of the algorithm is to find the production settings, in the long run, which provide the highest net present value (NPV), obtained from the initial investment cost, the price of oil, oil production and operation costs paid during the production time, considering the operational conditions economically viable, reducing operating costs and the time in the decision-making process. With the obtained results it was possible to observe that in many cases the application of the lines of action enabled relevant rise on the net present value (NPV) and also in the Recovery Factor, both seen in the end of the project. Considering the Case_36 of the mesh that has 300m, the Recovery Factor increased from 45,66% to 50,24%, a rise of almost 5 percentage points on the volume of oil recovered. In the light of what was presented, it may be perceived that the operations that alter (ascending or descending) the flow of water injection or that change the mesh?s layout on the field improve the profitability, reducing costs from the water injection, treatment and disposal of the produced water, increasing the duration of viability of the project. However, it is important to highlight that, in some cases, applying the lines of action, the final recovery factor is lower, but still the reductions of the operational costs will make the operation viable.