国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。

Quem cuida de quem cuida? Essa pergunta/incômodo nutre esta pesquisa, que tem como tema central compreender as estratégias adotadas pelos trabalhadores da Atenção Básica para cuidarem de si. Para suprir os objetivos da pesquisa, que compreendem diversos mecanismos (políticos, históricos, sociais...) que podem existir em torno do cuidar, foram criados três capítulos conceituais para fundamentar teoricamente a proposta: Proposições para o profissional da saúde cuidar de si: A Política Nacional de Humanização do Sistema Único de Saúde; A saúde do trabalhador da saúde; O cuidado, o autocuidado e o cuidado de si (subdivido em: O cuidado, O autocuidado e o Cuidado de SI; e “_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _” Correndo Riscos: Fugindo dos riscos na esteira da medicalização). Esta é uma pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa, que utilizou como metodologia entrevistas semiestruturadas, realizadas com profissionais da Atenção Básica da cidade de Porto Alegre, avaliadas pela análise de conteúdo proposta por Bardin (2011). Após a transcrição das entrevistas, as respostas foram distribuídas em cinco categorias: Cuidado: Acolhimento e escuta (categoria na qual revela-se a preocupação dos profissionais com as práticas de escuta e acolhimento nos serviços); Caminhando entre o vigilante autocuidado e a construção do cuidado de si (revelando as duas facetas do cuidar, sendo uma mais impositiva, ao passo que a outra pauta-se na construção conjunta com o usuário); Política/Gestão/Trabalhadores: três monólogos simultâneos (apontando a dificuldade de comunicação entre essas três estruturas); Fazendo milagres em condições precárias (indicando as más condições estruturais da Atenção Básica); O sujeito trabalhador tentando se cuidar e os “sumicídios diários” (que revela os caminhos do cuidado das trabalhadoras e a tentativa de sair do local de trabalho e esquecer o estresse e todas as lembranças do dia). Ao fim,realizou-se a “Devolutiva Cuidadora”, na qual os resultados foram apresentados a diversas pessoas e, ainda, onde ocorreram práticas de cuidado, como roda de conversa, danças circulares, práticas de respiração etc. Cuidar de si é também cuidar do outro, por isso é fundamental que o espaço do trabalho na saúde propicie esta reflexão, evitando que o dito popular, “Santo de casa não faz milagre”, que inspirou o título desta pesquisa, seja algo normalizado nos relatos dos profissionais de saúde. / Who looks after the ones that look after the others? This question/inconvenience nourished this research, which is focused on understanding the strategies adopted by the workers of Primary Care to look after themselves. To reach the research objectives, understanding the several (political, historical, social,…) mechanisms that may exist about caring, three conceptual chapters were created to support theoretically the hypothesis: Propositions for the health professionals look after themselves: The National Policy of Humanization of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS); The health of the person who works with health; The care, the self-care and the care for the self (subdivided in: The self, The self-care and the Care of the Self and “_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _”Taking Risks: Running away from risks on the heels of medicalization). This is a qualitative approach research which used semi structured interviews as methodology, which were performed with Primary Care professionals from Porto Alegre, evaluated by the content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011). After the interviews were transcribed, the answers were organized into five categories: Care: Shelter and listening (which reveals the worry professionals have with the listening and sheltering practices in the services); Walking between the self-care vigilant and the construction of the care of the self (revealing the two aspects of the care, when one is more imposing and the other is ruled by the shared construction with the user); Politics/Management/Workers: three simultaneous monologues (which shows the communication difficulty among these three structures); Making miracles in precarious conditions (which shows the poor structural conditions of the Primary Care); A worker trying to care for himself and the “daily suicides” (which reveals the ways workers care and the attempt to leave the workplace and forget the stress and all the day memories).At the end, it was also held the “Caring Feedback”, when the results were presented to many people and, besides, when there were care practices, like round of conversation, circular dances, breathing techniques etc. Looking after the self is also looking after the other, that is why it is essential that the workplace in health fosters this reflection, avoiding that the popular saying “No one is a prophet in their own land”, which inspired the title of this study, becomes something common in the reports of health professionals.

Quem cuida de quem cuida? Essa pergunta/incômodo nutre esta pesquisa, que tem como tema central compreender as estratégias adotadas pelos trabalhadores da Atenção Básica para cuidarem de si. Para suprir os objetivos da pesquisa, que compreendem diversos mecanismos (políticos, históricos, sociais...) que podem existir em torno do cuidar, foram criados três capítulos conceituais para fundamentar teoricamente a proposta: Proposições para o profissional da saúde cuidar de si: A Política Nacional de Humanização do Sistema Único de Saúde; A saúde do trabalhador da saúde; O cuidado, o autocuidado e o cuidado de si (subdivido em: O cuidado, O autocuidado e o Cuidado de SI; e “_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _” Correndo Riscos: Fugindo dos riscos na esteira da medicalização). Esta é uma pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa, que utilizou como metodologia entrevistas semiestruturadas, realizadas com profissionais da Atenção Básica da cidade de Porto Alegre, avaliadas pela análise de conteúdo proposta por Bardin (2011). Após a transcrição das entrevistas, as respostas foram distribuídas em cinco categorias: Cuidado: Acolhimento e escuta (categoria na qual revela-se a preocupação dos profissionais com as práticas de escuta e acolhimento nos serviços); Caminhando entre o vigilante autocuidado e a construção do cuidado de si (revelando as duas facetas do cuidar, sendo uma mais impositiva, ao passo que a outra pauta-se na construção conjunta com o usuário); Política/Gestão/Trabalhadores: três monólogos simultâneos (apontando a dificuldade de comunicação entre essas três estruturas); Fazendo milagres em condições precárias (indicando as más condições estruturais da Atenção Básica); O sujeito trabalhador tentando se cuidar e os “sumicídios diários” (que revela os caminhos do cuidado das trabalhadoras e a tentativa de sair do local de trabalho e esquecer o estresse e todas as lembranças do dia). Ao fim,realizou-se a “Devolutiva Cuidadora”, na qual os resultados foram apresentados a diversas pessoas e, ainda, onde ocorreram práticas de cuidado, como roda de conversa, danças circulares, práticas de respiração etc. Cuidar de si é também cuidar do outro, por isso é fundamental que o espaço do trabalho na saúde propicie esta reflexão, evitando que o dito popular, “Santo de casa não faz milagre”, que inspirou o título desta pesquisa, seja algo normalizado nos relatos dos profissionais de saúde. / Who looks after the ones that look after the others? This question/inconvenience nourished this research, which is focused on understanding the strategies adopted by the workers of Primary Care to look after themselves. To reach the research objectives, understanding the several (political, historical, social,…) mechanisms that may exist about caring, three conceptual chapters were created to support theoretically the hypothesis: Propositions for the health professionals look after themselves: The National Policy of Humanization of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS); The health of the person who works with health; The care, the self-care and the care for the self (subdivided in: The self, The self-care and the Care of the Self and “_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _”Taking Risks: Running away from risks on the heels of medicalization). This is a qualitative approach research which used semi structured interviews as methodology, which were performed with Primary Care professionals from Porto Alegre, evaluated by the content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011). After the interviews were transcribed, the answers were organized into five categories: Care: Shelter and listening (which reveals the worry professionals have with the listening and sheltering practices in the services); Walking between the self-care vigilant and the construction of the care of the self (revealing the two aspects of the care, when one is more imposing and the other is ruled by the shared construction with the user); Politics/Management/Workers: three simultaneous monologues (which shows the communication difficulty among these three structures); Making miracles in precarious conditions (which shows the poor structural conditions of the Primary Care); A worker trying to care for himself and the “daily suicides” (which reveals the ways workers care and the attempt to leave the workplace and forget the stress and all the day memories).At the end, it was also held the “Caring Feedback”, when the results were presented to many people and, besides, when there were care practices, like round of conversation, circular dances, breathing techniques etc. Looking after the self is also looking after the other, that is why it is essential that the workplace in health fosters this reflection, avoiding that the popular saying “No one is a prophet in their own land”, which inspired the title of this study, becomes something common in the reports of health professionals.

Quem cuida de quem cuida? Essa pergunta/incômodo nutre esta pesquisa, que tem como tema central compreender as estratégias adotadas pelos trabalhadores da Atenção Básica para cuidarem de si. Para suprir os objetivos da pesquisa, que compreendem diversos mecanismos (políticos, históricos, sociais...) que podem existir em torno do cuidar, foram criados três capítulos conceituais para fundamentar teoricamente a proposta: Proposições para o profissional da saúde cuidar de si: A Política Nacional de Humanização do Sistema Único de Saúde; A saúde do trabalhador da saúde; O cuidado, o autocuidado e o cuidado de si (subdivido em: O cuidado, O autocuidado e o Cuidado de SI; e “_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _” Correndo Riscos: Fugindo dos riscos na esteira da medicalização). Esta é uma pesquisa de abordagem qualitativa, que utilizou como metodologia entrevistas semiestruturadas, realizadas com profissionais da Atenção Básica da cidade de Porto Alegre, avaliadas pela análise de conteúdo proposta por Bardin (2011). Após a transcrição das entrevistas, as respostas foram distribuídas em cinco categorias: Cuidado: Acolhimento e escuta (categoria na qual revela-se a preocupação dos profissionais com as práticas de escuta e acolhimento nos serviços); Caminhando entre o vigilante autocuidado e a construção do cuidado de si (revelando as duas facetas do cuidar, sendo uma mais impositiva, ao passo que a outra pauta-se na construção conjunta com o usuário); Política/Gestão/Trabalhadores: três monólogos simultâneos (apontando a dificuldade de comunicação entre essas três estruturas); Fazendo milagres em condições precárias (indicando as más condições estruturais da Atenção Básica); O sujeito trabalhador tentando se cuidar e os “sumicídios diários” (que revela os caminhos do cuidado das trabalhadoras e a tentativa de sair do local de trabalho e esquecer o estresse e todas as lembranças do dia). Ao fim,realizou-se a “Devolutiva Cuidadora”, na qual os resultados foram apresentados a diversas pessoas e, ainda, onde ocorreram práticas de cuidado, como roda de conversa, danças circulares, práticas de respiração etc. Cuidar de si é também cuidar do outro, por isso é fundamental que o espaço do trabalho na saúde propicie esta reflexão, evitando que o dito popular, “Santo de casa não faz milagre”, que inspirou o título desta pesquisa, seja algo normalizado nos relatos dos profissionais de saúde. / Who looks after the ones that look after the others? This question/inconvenience nourished this research, which is focused on understanding the strategies adopted by the workers of Primary Care to look after themselves. To reach the research objectives, understanding the several (political, historical, social,…) mechanisms that may exist about caring, three conceptual chapters were created to support theoretically the hypothesis: Propositions for the health professionals look after themselves: The National Policy of Humanization of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS); The health of the person who works with health; The care, the self-care and the care for the self (subdivided in: The self, The self-care and the Care of the Self and “_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _”Taking Risks: Running away from risks on the heels of medicalization). This is a qualitative approach research which used semi structured interviews as methodology, which were performed with Primary Care professionals from Porto Alegre, evaluated by the content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011). After the interviews were transcribed, the answers were organized into five categories: Care: Shelter and listening (which reveals the worry professionals have with the listening and sheltering practices in the services); Walking between the self-care vigilant and the construction of the care of the self (revealing the two aspects of the care, when one is more imposing and the other is ruled by the shared construction with the user); Politics/Management/Workers: three simultaneous monologues (which shows the communication difficulty among these three structures); Making miracles in precarious conditions (which shows the poor structural conditions of the Primary Care); A worker trying to care for himself and the “daily suicides” (which reveals the ways workers care and the attempt to leave the workplace and forget the stress and all the day memories).At the end, it was also held the “Caring Feedback”, when the results were presented to many people and, besides, when there were care practices, like round of conversation, circular dances, breathing techniques etc. Looking after the self is also looking after the other, that is why it is essential that the workplace in health fosters this reflection, avoiding that the popular saying “No one is a prophet in their own land”, which inspired the title of this study, becomes something common in the reports of health professionals.

Abstract The purpose of this ethnographic study is to describe and analyse professional and lay care in the Bena cultural context in the Tanzanian village of Ilembula. The study focuses on care as a cultural phenomenon. The structure of the study is based on M.M. Leininger's (1991) Culture Care Theory In the first phase of the study, care was described from a professional perspective. The data were collected by interviewing and observing trained nurses (n=6) in the wards of Ilembula Lutheran Hospital. The study material was complemented with the data obtained from informants' diaries and institutional documents. The data were analysed by using qualitative ethnonursing analysis. In the second phase of the study, the focus was on lay care. The fieldwork was done in the Ilembula village and Ilembula Lutheran Hospital. The data were collected by interviewing villagers (n=49) and relatives (n=12) of patients admitted to Ilembula Lutheran Hospital, and by observing their care practices. The data were analysed by qualitative content analyses with regard to the cultural context. Curing and caring were the characteristics of professional care, as described by the nurse informants. Curing was linked to skills and knowledge obtained in nurse training and it was demonstrated through technical interventions, medication and health education. Caring referred to a natural mother-child relationship and reflected the traditional cultural knowledge. Caring was demonstrated in primary care, meaning a mother's responsibilities in taking care of a small baby, encouragement and comfort. The patient's recovery and maintenance of health were the goals of professional care. Respect and protection were the characteristics of lay care, reflecting the worldview and cultural values of the Bena. The aim of respect was to maintain family unity and to ensure wellbeing, while protection focused on the sensitive phases of the Bena life span. The main meaning of lay care for the informants was health maintenance and improvement of health. Health included physical, mental and reproductive aspects, and enabled them to respond to the culturally determined role expectations. The aim of this ethnographic study was to demonstrate that care is integral to much more comprehensive socio-cultural issues in the context of a Tanzanian village. The study demonstrates the meaning of cultural and social factors, such as cultural values and lifeways, kinship, economic, educational, and ethnohistory in both professional and lay care. The findings can be utilised in transcultural nursing education and in clinical nursing practice, especially in developing patient education from a transcultural perspective, not only in Tanzania, but internationally.

This diploma thesis deals with the dignity of a human suffering from Alzheimer's disease. The good-quality professional care originates from values of love and respect. It describes particular illness stages together with related changes. The key to the retention of human's dignity with Alzheimer's disease is the specific care, the individual approach, the empathy, the equal relation and communication skills. This thesis also summarizes the risk practices which often lead to undignified behaviou