Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-12-04T20:35:34Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JailmaSilvaDeOliveiraCarvalho_DISSERT.pdf: 2465048 bytes, checksum: 49e6c32b987ce194d37fff3010500c93 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-12-06T22:17:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JailmaSilvaDeOliveiraCarvalho_DISSERT.pdf: 2465048 bytes, checksum: 49e6c32b987ce194d37fff3010500c93 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-06T22:17:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JailmaSilvaDeOliveiraCarvalho_DISSERT.pdf: 2465048 bytes, checksum: 49e6c32b987ce194d37fff3010500c93 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-10-07 / Este estudo, vinculado ? Linha de Pesquisa: Educa??o, Representa??es e Forma??o Docente, surgiu das inquieta??es sobre a problem?tica que envolve as pr?ticas educativas no Ensino M?dio no contexto do Projeto de Inova??o Pedag?gica (PIP), a??o da Secretaria de Estado da Educa??o e da Cultura do RN, no ?mbito do Projeto RN Sustent?vel/ Banco Mundial. A quest?o norteadora do estudo impeliu-nos a questionar em que medida o Projeto de Inova??o Pedag?gica (PIP) contribui para as pr?ticas pedag?gicas inovadoras dos professores do Ensino M?dio da rede estadual do RN. O PIP, na sua primeira edi??o, trouxe como um dos pressupostos, a inova??o pedag?gica como uma altera??o qualitativa a acontecer na pr?tica dos professores, o que se d? por meio da identifica??o de um problema pedag?gico e da proposta inovadora constru?da pela escola. Identificamos que as contribui??es do PIP ?s pr?ticas pedag?gicas inovadoras dos professores do Ensino M?dio foram a abertura para o uso das novas tecnologias e o fortalecimento ao planejamento do ensino. Os resultados da pesquisa indicaram experi?ncias pontuais, por?m significativas, no contexto em que foram desenvolvidas, no tocante ao envolvimento e entusiasmo das equipes escolares aplicadas ao planejamento e ? organiza??o do trabalho pedag?gico coletivo e colaborativo. As pr?ticas caracterizadas no estudo emitem notas conclusivas a despeito de n?o serem consideradas pr?ximas ao preconizado pela ruptura paradigm?tica prescrita na pr?tica pedag?gica inovadora. As pr?ticas inovadoras, para os professores, est?o ainda enraizadas numa cultura de inova??o baseada no uso de dispositivos tecnol?gicos e que n?o mobilizam saberes e tomadas de decis?o conscientes. Essas constata??es se deram a partir do referencial te?rico das concep??es de inova??o pedag?gica e das pr?ticas pedag?gicas inovadoras em: Garcia (1989); Pretto (1997); Messina e Blanco (2000); Aguerrondo e Xifra (2002); Carbonell (2002); Militrus (2002); Tedesco, (2004), Mac?as (2007); Mu?oz e Hernandez (2008); Moreira (2008); Poggi (2011); Farias (2006). No ?mbito da forma??o, manteve-se um di?logo com estudos realizados por Ramalho et al. (2004, 2014); Perrenoud et al. (2001); Charlot (2001); Perrenoud (2000); Imbern?n, (2012), Garcia (2013), entre outros. Trata-se de um estudo explorat?rio baseado na abordagem qualitativa. O instrumento utilizado para coleta dos dados foi um question?rio semiestruturado com quest?es abertas e fechadas, bem como os seis projetos das escolas pesquisadas. Os procedimentos utilizados para an?lise dos resultados se deram por meio da t?cnica de An?lise de Conte?do de Bardin (1977) e Amado (2000). / This study, linked to the Research Line: Education, Representations and Teacher Training, arose from the concerns about the problematic that involves the educational practices in High School in the context of the Pedagogical Innovation Project (PIP), action of the State Secretariat of Education and Culture of the RN, within the framework of the Sustainable RN Project / World Bank. The guiding question of the study prompted us to question the extent to which the Pedagogical Innovation Project (PIP) contributes to the innovative pedagogical practices of the high school teachers of the RN state network. PIP, in its first edition, has brought pedagogical innovation as a qualitative change to occur in the practice of teachers as a presupposition, which is achieved through the identification of a pedagogical problem and the innovative proposal built by the school. We identified that the contributions of PIP to the innovative pedagogical practices of high school teachers were the openness to the use of new technologies and the strengthening of teaching planning. The results of the research indicated punctual but significant experiences in the context in which they were developed, regarding the involvement and enthusiasm of the school teams applied to the planning and organization of collective and collaborative pedagogical work. The practices characterized in the study emit conclusive notes in spite of not being considered close to the one advocated by the paradigmatic rupture prescribed in the innovative pedagogical practice. Innovative practices for teachers are still rooted in a culture of innovation based on the use of technological devices that do not mobilize conscious knowledge and decision-making. These findings were based on the theoretical reference of the conceptions of pedagogical innovation and innovative pedagogical practices in: Garcia (1989); Pretto (1997); Messina and Blanco (2000); Aguerrondo and Xifra (2002); Carbonell (2002); Militrus (2002); Tedesco, (2004), Mac?as (2007); Mu?oz and Hernandez (2008); Moreira (2008); Poggi (2011); Farias (2006). In the scope of training, a dialogue was maintained with studies carried out by Ramalho et al. (2004, 2014); Perrenoud et al. (2001); Charlot (2001); Perrenoud (2000); Imbern?n, (2012), Garcia (2013), among others. This is an exploratory study based on the qualitative approach. The instrument used to collect the data was a semi-structured questionnaire with open and closed questions, as well as the six projects of the schools surveyed. The procedures used to analyze the results were obtained through the technique of Content Analysis of Bardin (1977) and Amado (2000).