No description available.

Os craniofaringiomas são os tumores mais frequentes da região hipotálamohipofisária na faixa etária pediátrica. Apesar de serem histologicamente benignos, sua tendência infiltrativa e seu comportamento agressivo resultam em significante morbimortalidade. Histologicamente podem ser divididos em dois subtipos: adamantinomatosos e papilíferos. A patogênese dos craniofaringiomas é pouco compreendida. Mutações no gene CTNNB1, que codifica a proteína beta-catenina, são a única alteração molecular conhecida até o momento implicada na tumorigênese dos craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Tais mutações afetam o sítio de degradação da beta-catenina, que passa a se acumular no citoplasma e no núcleo, ativando excessivamente a via de sinalização WNT, através da ligação aos fatores de transcrição da família LEF/TCF, levando a tumorigênese. Recentemente foi descoberto um novo mecanismo de determinação da linhagem celular hipofisária regulado pela beta-catenina, através do qual ela interage diretamente com o PROP1 para determinar a diferenciação celular hipofisária. De acordo com esse modelo, o complexo protéico PROP1/beta- catenina atua simultaneamente como repressor do HESX1 e ativador do PIT1, dependendo dos co-fatores associados. Pacientes com mutações germinativas inativadoras no PROP1 desenvolvem hipopituitarismo e podem apresentar aumento hipofisário com imagens de ressonância nuclear magnética (RNM) da região selar muitas vezes semelhantes àquelas dos craniofaringiomas, com hiperssinal em T1. Por outro lado, camundongos com expressão persistente do Prop1 exibem defeitos na regulação da proliferação celular hipofisária, incluindo cistos da bolsa de Rathke, hiperplasia adenomatosa e tumores, sugerindo que mutações com ganho de função no PROP1 também poderiam contribuir para a patogênese de tumores hipofisários em seres humanos. A semelhança entre as imagens de RNM dos pacientes com craniofaringiomas e daqueles com aumento hipofisário devido a mutações inativadoras no PROP1, e o fato de que camundongos transgênicos com expressão persistente do Prop1 apresentam aumento da susceptibilidade a tumores hipofisários, deram base a nossa hipótese de que uma desregulação na expressão do PROP1 em humanos poderia estar envolvida na patogênese dos craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Esse trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a presença de mutação somática no exon 3 do CTNNB1 e avaliar a expressão desse gene e do gene PROP1 em craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Foram obtidas 14 amostras desse tipo de tumor por meio da ressecção terapêutica. As amostras foram submetidas à extração do RNA e posterior transcrição reversa para obtenção de cDNA. A partir do cDNA foi realizada PCR e sequenciamento do exon 3 do CTNNB1 em todas as amostras. Porém, a avaliação por PCR em tempo real foi realizada apenas em 12 amostras, devido à qualidade inadequada de 2 amostras para submissão a essa metodologia. Foram encontradas mutações missense, em heterozigose em 9 das 14 amostras, sendo 5 previamente descritas e 2 ainda não descritas em craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Hiperexpressão do CTNNB1 foi encontrada em 7 amostras, sendo 5 com mutação e 2 sem mutação no CTNNB1.A hiperexpressão variou de 2,5 a 6,2 vezes maior que o pool de hipófise normal. Contudo, a expressão do PROP1 foi indetectável em todas as amostras. Concluímos que o aumento da expressão do CTNNB1 presente em 58% das amostras sugere o envolvimento também da hiperexpressão desse gene na etiopatogenia do craniofaringioma adamantinomatoso, enquanto a ausência de expressão do PROP1 afasta a participação desse gene na etiopatogenia do craniofaringioma adamantinomatoso / Craniopharyngiomas are the the commonest tumors to involve the hypothalamo-pituitary regions in childhood population. Histologically they are benign, and can be divided in two primary subtypes: the adamantinomatous and the papillary. Although histologically benign, their infiltrative tendency and aggressive behavior can result in great morbidity. The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas is poorly understood. To date, beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) mutations have been identified only in the adamantinomatous subtype. These mutations affect the degradation target box of beta-catenin that accumulates in the cytoplasm and the nucleus increasing the transcriptional activity of WNT pathway through interaction with the transcription factors of LEF/TCF family, leading to tumorigenesis. Recently, an interaction between beta-catenin and PROP1 was described as a new mecanism for beta-catenindependent regulation of pituitary cell-lineage determination. According to this novel model, the PROP1/beta-catenin proteic complex would act as a binary switch to simultaneously repress the transcription factor HESX1 and to activate expression of transcription factor PIT1, depending on the associated cofactors. Patients with loss-of-function mutations in PROP1 present combined pituitary hormonal deficiency generally associated with pituitary enlargement and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sellar region in these patients sometimes resembles that of the craniopharyngiomas, with T1 hyperintense signal. On the other hand, transgenic mice with persistent Prop1 expression exhibit defects consistent with misregulation of pituitary cell proliferation, including adenomatous hyperplasia with formation of Rathke\'s cleft cysts and tumors suggesting that misregulation of PROP1 expression in human could contribute to pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. The similarity between the MRI images of craniopharyngiomas patients and that of patients with loss-of-function mutations in PROP1, associated with the fact that transgenic mice with persistent Prop1 expression exhibit increased susceptibility to pituitary tumors gave rise to our hypothesis that a misregulation of PROP1 expression could be involved in the pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of somatic mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1 and the expression pattern of this gene and the PROP1 gene in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. Fourteen samples were obtained from therapeutic surgery and submitted to RNA extraction and reverse transcription in order to produce the cDNA. The cDNA was used as a template to CTNNB1 exon 3 PCR reaction followed by direct sequencing of all samples. However, the real-time RT-PCR analysis was realized only in 12 samples, since 2 of them had an insufficient quality for this method. Missence, heterozygous mutations were found in 9 out of 14 samples; five were previously described and 2 not yet described in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. Overexpression of CTNNB1 was found in 7 samples, which them 5 with CTNNB1 mutation 2 whitout. The overexpression ranged from 2.5 to 6.2 fold more than pituitary normal pool. However, the PROP1 expression was undetectable in all the samples. We could conclude that the amount of 58% CTNNB1 overexpressed samples suggest also a role of this overexpression in the pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharingiomas, while the undetectable levels of PROP1 exclude a role of this gene in the pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharingiomas

Poon, Fan Fong. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 109-124). / Abstract also in Chinese. / Abstract --- p.i / Acknowledgements --- p.v / Table of Content --- p.vi / List of Figures --- p.xi / List of Tables --- p.xiii / List of Abbreviations --- p.xiv / List of papers published during the study --- p.xvi / Chapter Chapter 1 --- Introduction and Aim of Study --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- General Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Project objective and potential significances --- p.6 / Chapter Chapter 2 --- Literature Reviews --- p.8 / Chapter 2.1 --- Cancer genetics --- p.8 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- Oncogenes and TSGs --- p.8 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Kundsońةs two-hit event of cancer gene --- p.9 / Chapter 2.2 --- Cancer Epigenetics --- p.9 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Types of Epigenetic regulation --- p.10 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- DNA methylation in TSGs --- p.10 / Chapter 2.2.2.1 --- Promoter CpG island in DNA methylation --- p.10 / Chapter 2.2.2.2 --- Protection system in DNA methylation --- p.11 / Chapter 2.2.2.3 --- Transcriptional silencing by DNA methylation --- p.11 / Chapter 2.2.2.4 --- DNA methylation of TSG silencing in cancers --- p.13 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- Hypomethylation of the cancer genome --- p.14 / Chapter 2.2.4 --- Clinical relevance of cancer epigenetic --- p.14 / Chapter 2.3 --- EGFR/STAT/SOCS pathway --- p.15 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- General Introduction of the EGFR pathway --- p.15 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- EGFR survival signaling pathways --- p.16 / Chapter 2.3.3 --- EGFR/STAT/SOCS signaling --- p.17 / Chapter 2.3.4 --- EGFR/STAT/SOCS signaling and cancers --- p.18 / Chapter 2.3.4.1 --- EGF and cancers --- p.18 / Chapter 2.3.4.2 --- EGFR/STAT/SOCS pathway and cancers --- p.18 / Chapter 2.3.4.3 --- EGF survival signaling as a target for cancer therapy --- p.19 / Chapter 2.4 --- TSGs in the EGFR/STAT/SOCS pathway --- p.20 / Chapter 2.4.1 --- Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) family --- p.20 / Chapter 2.4.2 --- Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) family --- p.22 / Chapter 2.4.3 --- Sprouty (SPRY) family --- p.23 / Chapter 2.4.4 --- Protein Inhibitor of Activated STAT (PIASs) family --- p.25 / Chapter 2.4.5 --- Ras and Rab Interactor (RIN) family --- p.26 / Chapter 2.4.6 --- Ras-association domain family (RASSF) --- p.26 / Chapter 2.4.7 --- Glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT) --- p.28 / Chapter 2.5 --- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) --- p.30 / Chapter 2.5.1 --- Epidemiology of NPC --- p.30 / Chapter 2.5.2 --- Histopathology of NPC --- p.30 / Chapter 2.5.3 --- Genetic and epigenetic alteration in NPC --- p.31 / Chapter 2.5.4 --- EGFR signaling in NPC --- p.32 / Chapter 2.6 --- Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) --- p.33 / Chapter 2.6.1 --- Epidemiology of ESCC --- p.34 / Chapter 2.6.2 --- Histopathology of ESCC --- p.34 / Chapter 2.6.3 --- Genetic and epigenetic alteration in ESCC --- p.35 / Chapter 2.6.4 --- EGFR signaling in ESCC --- p.36 / Chapter Chapter 3 --- Materials and Methods --- p.38 / Chapter 3.1 --- General Materials --- p.38 / Chapter 3.1.1 --- "Cell lines, tumor and normal tissue samples" --- p.38 / Chapter 3.1.2 --- Maintenance of cell lines --- p.38 / Chapter 3.1.3 --- Drugs treatment of cell lines --- p.39 / Chapter 3.1.4 --- Total RNA extraction --- p.39 / Chapter 3.1.5 --- Genomic DNA extraction --- p.40 / Chapter 3.2 --- General techniques --- p.40 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA --- p.40 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- TA cloning and blunt end cloning of PCR product --- p.40 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- Transformation of cloning products to E. coli competent cells --- p.41 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- Preparation of plasmid DNA --- p.41 / Chapter 3.2.4.1 --- Mini-prep plasmid DNA extraction --- p.41 / Chapter 3.2.4.2 --- Midi-prep of plasmid DNA --- p.42 / Chapter 3.2.5 --- Measurement of DNA or RNA concentrations --- p.42 / Chapter 3.2.6 --- DNA sequencing of plasmid DNA and PCR products --- p.42 / Chapter 3.3 --- Preparation of reagents and medium --- p.43 / Chapter 3.4 --- Semi-quatitative Reverse-Transcription (RT) PCR expression analysis --- p.44 / Chapter 3.4.1 --- Reverse transcriptin reaction --- p.44 / Chapter 3.4.2 --- Semi-quantitative RT-PCR --- p.44 / Chapter 3.4.2.1 --- Primers design --- p.44 / Chapter 3.4.2.2 --- PCR reaction --- p.46 / Chapter 3.5 --- Methylation analysis of candidate genes --- p.47 / Chapter 3.5.1 --- Bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA --- p.47 / Chapter 3.5.2 --- Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) --- p.48 / Chapter 3.5.2.1 --- Bioinformatics prediction of CpG island --- p.48 / Chapter 3.5.2.2 --- Primers design --- p.48 / Chapter 3.5.2.3 --- PCR reaction --- p.49 / Chapter 3.5.3 --- Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing (BGS) --- p.50 / Chapter 3.6 --- Construction of expression vectors of candidate genes --- p.51 / Chapter 3.6.1 --- Sub-cloning of expression vector of candidate genes --- p.51 / Chapter 3.6.1.1 --- Mouse Socsl expression vector --- p.51 / Chapter 3.6.1.2 --- SPRY1 expression vector --- p.51 / Chapter 3.6.1.3 --- GNMT expression vector --- p.52 / Chapter 3.6.2 --- Restriction digestion of cloning vectors and expression --- p.52 / Chapter 3.6.3 --- Ligation of cloning fragments --- p.53 / Chapter 3.6.4 --- Colony formation assay on monolayer culture --- p.53 / Chapter 3.6.5 --- Statistical analysis --- p.54 / Chapter Chapter 4 --- Screening of candidate TSGs in EGFR pathway --- p.55 / Chapter 5.3.3 --- Restoration of GNMT expression by pharmacological demethylation --- p.89 / Chapter 5.3.4 --- Confirmation of the methylation status of GNMT promoter by BGS --- p.90 / Chapter 5.3.5 --- Methylation status of GNMT in ESCC and NPC primary tumors --- p.90 / Chapter 5.3.6 --- GNMT inhibited the growth of tumor cells in-vitro --- p.90 / Chapter 5.3.7 --- Discussion --- p.95 / Chapter Chapter 6 --- General Discussion --- p.100 / Chapter Chapter 7 --- Summary --- p.105 / Chapter Chapter 8 --- Future Study --- p.107 / Reference --- p.109

Os craniofaringiomas são os tumores mais frequentes da região hipotálamohipofisária na faixa etária pediátrica. Apesar de serem histologicamente benignos, sua tendência infiltrativa e seu comportamento agressivo resultam em significante morbimortalidade. Histologicamente podem ser divididos em dois subtipos: adamantinomatosos e papilíferos. A patogênese dos craniofaringiomas é pouco compreendida. Mutações no gene CTNNB1, que codifica a proteína beta-catenina, são a única alteração molecular conhecida até o momento implicada na tumorigênese dos craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Tais mutações afetam o sítio de degradação da beta-catenina, que passa a se acumular no citoplasma e no núcleo, ativando excessivamente a via de sinalização WNT, através da ligação aos fatores de transcrição da família LEF/TCF, levando a tumorigênese. Recentemente foi descoberto um novo mecanismo de determinação da linhagem celular hipofisária regulado pela beta-catenina, através do qual ela interage diretamente com o PROP1 para determinar a diferenciação celular hipofisária. De acordo com esse modelo, o complexo protéico PROP1/beta- catenina atua simultaneamente como repressor do HESX1 e ativador do PIT1, dependendo dos co-fatores associados. Pacientes com mutações germinativas inativadoras no PROP1 desenvolvem hipopituitarismo e podem apresentar aumento hipofisário com imagens de ressonância nuclear magnética (RNM) da região selar muitas vezes semelhantes àquelas dos craniofaringiomas, com hiperssinal em T1. Por outro lado, camundongos com expressão persistente do Prop1 exibem defeitos na regulação da proliferação celular hipofisária, incluindo cistos da bolsa de Rathke, hiperplasia adenomatosa e tumores, sugerindo que mutações com ganho de função no PROP1 também poderiam contribuir para a patogênese de tumores hipofisários em seres humanos. A semelhança entre as imagens de RNM dos pacientes com craniofaringiomas e daqueles com aumento hipofisário devido a mutações inativadoras no PROP1, e o fato de que camundongos transgênicos com expressão persistente do Prop1 apresentam aumento da susceptibilidade a tumores hipofisários, deram base a nossa hipótese de que uma desregulação na expressão do PROP1 em humanos poderia estar envolvida na patogênese dos craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Esse trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a presença de mutação somática no exon 3 do CTNNB1 e avaliar a expressão desse gene e do gene PROP1 em craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Foram obtidas 14 amostras desse tipo de tumor por meio da ressecção terapêutica. As amostras foram submetidas à extração do RNA e posterior transcrição reversa para obtenção de cDNA. A partir do cDNA foi realizada PCR e sequenciamento do exon 3 do CTNNB1 em todas as amostras. Porém, a avaliação por PCR em tempo real foi realizada apenas em 12 amostras, devido à qualidade inadequada de 2 amostras para submissão a essa metodologia. Foram encontradas mutações missense, em heterozigose em 9 das 14 amostras, sendo 5 previamente descritas e 2 ainda não descritas em craniofaringiomas adamantinomatosos. Hiperexpressão do CTNNB1 foi encontrada em 7 amostras, sendo 5 com mutação e 2 sem mutação no CTNNB1.A hiperexpressão variou de 2,5 a 6,2 vezes maior que o pool de hipófise normal. Contudo, a expressão do PROP1 foi indetectável em todas as amostras. Concluímos que o aumento da expressão do CTNNB1 presente em 58% das amostras sugere o envolvimento também da hiperexpressão desse gene na etiopatogenia do craniofaringioma adamantinomatoso, enquanto a ausência de expressão do PROP1 afasta a participação desse gene na etiopatogenia do craniofaringioma adamantinomatoso / Craniopharyngiomas are the the commonest tumors to involve the hypothalamo-pituitary regions in childhood population. Histologically they are benign, and can be divided in two primary subtypes: the adamantinomatous and the papillary. Although histologically benign, their infiltrative tendency and aggressive behavior can result in great morbidity. The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas is poorly understood. To date, beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) mutations have been identified only in the adamantinomatous subtype. These mutations affect the degradation target box of beta-catenin that accumulates in the cytoplasm and the nucleus increasing the transcriptional activity of WNT pathway through interaction with the transcription factors of LEF/TCF family, leading to tumorigenesis. Recently, an interaction between beta-catenin and PROP1 was described as a new mecanism for beta-catenindependent regulation of pituitary cell-lineage determination. According to this novel model, the PROP1/beta-catenin proteic complex would act as a binary switch to simultaneously repress the transcription factor HESX1 and to activate expression of transcription factor PIT1, depending on the associated cofactors. Patients with loss-of-function mutations in PROP1 present combined pituitary hormonal deficiency generally associated with pituitary enlargement and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sellar region in these patients sometimes resembles that of the craniopharyngiomas, with T1 hyperintense signal. On the other hand, transgenic mice with persistent Prop1 expression exhibit defects consistent with misregulation of pituitary cell proliferation, including adenomatous hyperplasia with formation of Rathke\'s cleft cysts and tumors suggesting that misregulation of PROP1 expression in human could contribute to pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. The similarity between the MRI images of craniopharyngiomas patients and that of patients with loss-of-function mutations in PROP1, associated with the fact that transgenic mice with persistent Prop1 expression exhibit increased susceptibility to pituitary tumors gave rise to our hypothesis that a misregulation of PROP1 expression could be involved in the pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of somatic mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1 and the expression pattern of this gene and the PROP1 gene in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. Fourteen samples were obtained from therapeutic surgery and submitted to RNA extraction and reverse transcription in order to produce the cDNA. The cDNA was used as a template to CTNNB1 exon 3 PCR reaction followed by direct sequencing of all samples. However, the real-time RT-PCR analysis was realized only in 12 samples, since 2 of them had an insufficient quality for this method. Missence, heterozygous mutations were found in 9 out of 14 samples; five were previously described and 2 not yet described in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas. Overexpression of CTNNB1 was found in 7 samples, which them 5 with CTNNB1 mutation 2 whitout. The overexpression ranged from 2.5 to 6.2 fold more than pituitary normal pool. However, the PROP1 expression was undetectable in all the samples. We could conclude that the amount of 58% CTNNB1 overexpressed samples suggest also a role of this overexpression in the pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharingiomas, while the undetectable levels of PROP1 exclude a role of this gene in the pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharingiomas

RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved mechanism in a wide range of eukaryotes. Introduction of synthetic dsRNA could specifically target suppression of a gene or could result in off-target silencing of another gene due to sequence similarity. To verify if the observed phenotype in an RNAi transgenic line is due to silencing of a specific gene or if it is due to another nontarget gene, a synthetic gene complementation approach could be used. Synthetic gene complementation described in this method uses the technology of synthesizing a variant of a native gene (used in RNAi silencing) to maximize the difference in DNA sequences while coding for the exact same amino acids as the original native gene. This is achieved through the use of alternate codons. The new variant gene is expressed in the original RNAi transgenic lines and analyzed for complementation of the RNAi phenotype. Complementation of the RNAi-induced phenotype will indicate gene-specific silencing and not off-target silencing.

Awakening of zygotic transcription in animal embryos relies on maternal pioneer transcription factors. The interplay of global and specific functions of these proteins remains poorly understood. Here, we analyze chromatin accessibility and time-resolved transcription in single and double mutant zebrafish embryos lacking pluripotency factors Pou5f3 and Sox19b. We show that two factors modify chromatin in a largely independent manner. We distinguish four types of direct enhancers by differential requirements for Pou5f3 or Sox19b. We demonstrate that changes in chromatin accessibility of enhancers underlie the changes in zygotic expression repertoire in the double mutants. Pou5f3 or Sox19b promote chromatin accessibility of enhancers linked to the genes involved in gastrulation and ventral fate specification. The genes regulating mesendodermal and dorsal fates are primed for activation independently of Pou5f3 and Sox19b. Strikingly, simultaneous loss of Pou5f3 and Sox19b leads to premature expression of genes, involved in regulation of organogenesis and differentiation.