Spelling suggestions: "subject:"protest parties"" "subject:"protest arties""
1 |
Protestparteien in Regierungsverantwortung : Die Grünen, die Alternative Liste, die STATT Partei und die Schill-Partei in ihrer ersten Legislaturperiode als kleine Koalitionspartner / Protest parties in responsibility of governmentWipperling, Adriana January 2006 (has links)
Übernimmt eine Protestpartei Regierungsverantwortung, sieht sie ihre Prinzipien und Forderungen der realpolitischen Nagelprobe ausgesetzt. Es ist ein Dilemma von Anspruch und Wirklichkeit, ein Spagat zwischen Protestimage und Regierungspolitik / der diese Parteien oftmals zu zerreißen droht. Anhand der Fallstudien von vier mitregierenden Protestparteien in Deutschland sollen folgende Fragen beantwortet werden: Was macht eine Partei zur Protestpartei? Was waren die Ursachen für die Wahlerfolge der Grünen, der AL, der STATT-Partei und der Schill-Partei? Wie verliefen die Koalitionsverhandlungen? Welche Forderungen konnten die Protestparteien gegenüber ihren großen Koalitionspartnern durchsetzen? Wo mussten sie Abstriche machen? Welche Reformvorhaben wurden angedacht und welche wurden tatsächlich umgesetzt? Welche innerparteilichen Konflikte ergaben sich aus der neuen Rolle der Protestparteien?
Letztendlich zeigt sich: Protestparteien scheitern nicht an ihrem schmalspurigen Programm, geringer Stammwählerschaft oder unerfahrenem Personal, sondern weil sie naturgemäß in die „Erwartungsfalle“ tappen. / “If a protest party assumes the responsibility of government its principles and demands will be put to the tough test of practical politics. The ensuing dilemma between standards and reality, its protest image and government policy often threatens to tear these parties apart. Taking four protest parties involved in government in Germany as an example, the following questions will be examined: What turns a party into a protest party? What were the reasons for the electoral successes of the Greens, the AL, the STATT party and the Schill party? What took place during the coalition negotiations? What demands were the protest parties successfully able to push through against their large coalition partners? On which points did they have to give in? What plans for reform were developed and which of them were actually implemented? What internal conflicts emerged within these parties after their role as protest parties changed?
The final analysis comes to the following conclusion: Protest parties do not fail because of a narrow-minded programme, lack of electoral support or inexperienced staff, but because their very nature causes them to fall into the “expectation trap”.
|
2 |
Politický vývoj na Slovensku po volbách v roce 2010 / Political Development in Slovakia after the 2010 ElectionsSkala, Martin January 2017 (has links)
The purpose of this master thesis is to analyze movements and changes on the Slovak political scene, Slovak party system as well as increase of support for antisystem and populist parties. The master thesis devotes its attention to individual governments, their characteristics and electoral support to relevant parties. The work is intended to answer the question whether the party system has changed over the period under review and in what way, and if the antisystemic parties and the phenomenon of populism have grown in the last six years. The theoretical concepts of Giovanni Sartori's party systems, the antisystemic parties from Sartori and Giovanni Capoccia and populism from Franciso Panizza, Cas Mudde, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser and Chantal Mouffe are used to examine the dynamics of the Slovak political scene in order to answer the above questions. Keywords elections, political parties, party system, moderate pluralism, polarized pluralism, antisystem parties, protest parties, populism
|
3 |
Politický vývoj na Slovensku po volbách v roce 2010 / Political Development in Slovakia after the 2010 ElectionsSkala, Martin January 2018 (has links)
The purpose of this master thesis is to analyze movements and changes on the Slovak political scene, Slovak party system as well as increase of support for antisystem and populist parties. The master thesis devotes its attention to individual governments, their characteristics and electoral support to relevant parties. The work is intended to answer the question whether the party system has changed over the period under review and in what way, and if the antisystemic parties and the phenomenon of populism have grown in the last six years. The theoretical concepts of Giovanni Sartori's party systems, the antisystemic parties from Sartori and Giovanni Capoccia and populism from Franciso Panizza, Cas Mudde, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser and Chantal Mouffe are used to examine the dynamics of the Slovak political scene in order to answer the above questions. Keywords elections, political parties, party system, moderate pluralism, polarized pluralism, antisystem parties, protest parties, populism
|
Page generated in 0.0626 seconds