Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-03-31T22:08:52Z No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandaCavalcantiDeMedeiros_DISSERT.pdf: 1885930 bytes, checksum: c2bbc7510408f4c0e78c5e6a2beb5530 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-04-01T21:42:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandaCavalcantiDeMedeiros_DISSERT.pdf: 1885930 bytes, checksum: c2bbc7510408f4c0e78c5e6a2beb5530 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-01T21:42:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 FernandaCavalcantiDeMedeiros_DISSERT.pdf: 1885930 bytes, checksum: c2bbc7510408f4c0e78c5e6a2beb5530 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-06 / A presente disserta??o tem como objetivo geral investigar de que forma as fam?lias est?o inseridas no processo de socioeduca??o dos adolescentes que cumprem medidas socioeducativas de priva??o de liberdade. Neste sentido, elencaram-se como objetivos espec?ficos: caracterizar a conviv?ncia entre adolescentes em priva??o de liberdade e seus familiares, a partir das pr?ticas e rotinas do sistema socioeducativo; analisar a articula??o entre as equipes profissionais que atuam no campo da socioeduca??o, visando o atendimento e fortalecimento das fam?lias dos adolescentes; investigar como as fam?lias avaliam a operacionaliza??o do processo de socioeduca??o no qual os adolescentes s?o atendidos. M?todo: Para alcan?ar os objetivos propostos, a coleta de dados ocorreu em etapas complementares: a primeira fase se deu a partir de visitas ?s unidades socioeducativas de priva??o de liberdade do RN, e di?logos com profissionais que atuam na socioeduca??o. Posteriormente, foi realizada etapa de pesquisa-a??o, a partir da inser??o da pesquisadora no projeto de extens?o ?Familiares e a luta pela efetividade do Sistema Nacional de Atendimento Socioeducativo?, que objetivou fortalecer o acompanhamento da socioeduca??o dos adolescentes por seus familiares, e teve como metodologia rodas de conversa e oficinas tem?ticas. Por fim, foram realizadas a leitura e an?lise das refer?ncias ? fam?lia no Plano de Atendimento Individual (PIA) de quinze adolescentes, os quais os familiares participaram da etapa de roda de conversa. As informa??es coletadas foram registradas em di?rios de campo. Esta pesquisa foi orientada pelo referencial te?rico marxiano, que parte da compreens?o do envolvimento dos adolescentes com atos infracionais como desdobramento e express?o da ?quest?o social?. A partir deste referencial te?rico, ? poss?vel problematizar a vis?o predominante na sociedade capitalista dos adolescentes em conflito com a lei como sujeitos que devem ser tratados pela via da repress?o e segrega??o, bem como a fragilidade das pol?ticas sociais, tanto na execu??o das pr?prias medidas socioeducativas, como na articula??o da rede de servi?os para a prote??o do adolescente e o fortalecimento de sua fam?lia. Resultados: quanto ao funcionamento do sistema socioeducativo do RN, de modo geral, p?de-se observar um quadro de espa?os f?sicos insalubres e pr?ticas institucionais violadoras de direitos humanos, ociosidade e falta de acesso aos direitos sociais, e de criminaliza??o e institucionaliza??o dos jovens pobres e suas fam?lias. No que diz respeito ? conviv?ncia familiar, percebeu-se grande dist?ncia entre os princ?pios e diretrizes preconizados pelo SINASE, acerca da conviv?ncia e fortalecimento familiar, e as pr?ticas cotidianas da socioeduca??o no RN: foram observadas graves viola??es, que comprometem a conviv?ncia entre os adolescentes e seus familiares, como a dist?ncia entre as unidades socioeducativas de priva??o de liberdade e os munic?pios onde residem as fam?lias; aus?ncia, irregularidade e condi??es prec?rias na realiza??o das visitas pelos familiares; n?o exist?ncia de visitas ?ntimas; a??es restritas e desarticuladas para o cuidado e fortalecimento com os familiares dos adolescentes, que em sua maioria vivem em condi??es de pobreza ou extrema pobreza. Por fim, foram encontrados processos de culpabiliza??o e uma s?rie de puni??es ? fam?lia, que incluem pr?ticas como a revista ?ntima vexat?ria, al?m de uma s?rie de viol?ncias e omiss?es de cuidados que adoecem os familiares e fragilizam os v?nculos entre os adolescentes e suas fam?lias. / This master thesis has the main goal investigate how families are inserted in the socioeducational process of teenagers who are undergoing social measures of liberty deprivation. The specific objectives are: to characterize the family?s living together of adolescents deprived of their freedom and their families, from the actions and routines of the socio-educational system; to assess the professional working links in the context of socio-education, in order to care and strengthening families of the adolescents; to investigate how families evaluate the operation of socio-educational process in which adolescents are met. Method: to achieve the proposed objectives, data collection occurred in complementary steps: the first phase took place from visits to socioeducational units of liberty deprivation of RN, and dialogues with professionals working in socio-education. Subsequently, action research stage was carried out, from the insertion of the researcher in the extension project Family and the struggle for the effectiveness of the National Socio Service System, that aimed to strengthen monitoring the adolescents socio-education by their families, and had as methodology the conversation circles and thematic workshops. Lastly, were performed reading and analysis of the references to the family in the Individual Care Plans (PIAs) for adolescents. The information gathered was recorded in field diaries and subjected to thematic content analysis. This research was guided by the Marxist theoretical framework, structured on the understanding of the involvement of adolescents with illegal acts as a development and expression of the social question. From this theoretical framework, the prevailing view in the capitalist society of adolescents in conflict with the law as individuals who are treated by means of repression and segregation and the weakness of social policies is questioned, both in the execution of their own socioeducational measures as the articulation of network services for adolescent protection and strengthening your family. Results: in relation to the operation of the socioeducational system in RN in general, it was observed a state of unhealthy physical spaces and institutional practices that violate human rights, idleness and lack of access to social rights, and criminalization and institutionalization of poor young people and their families. With regard to family?s living together, it was noticed great distance between principles and guidelines recommended by the SINASE, about acquaintanceship and family strengthening, and every day practices of socio-education in RN: serious violations were observed that undermine the family?s living together, as the distance between the socio-educational units of deprivation of liberty and the cities where families live; absence, irregularity and poor conditions in carrying out the family visits; lack of conjugal visits; restricted and unarticulated actions for the care and strengthening of the families of adolescents, most of whom live in poverty or extreme poverty. Finally, it was found a number of blamefully and punishments to the family, including practices such as inward inspection (visual inspection while naked and squant), plus a series of violence and omissions care that sick family members and weaken the links between adolescents and their families.