Individual and situational influences on distortion of personality tests were investigated. It was expected that individuals would use different distortion strategies in different situations and that individual differences would influence distortion. Two laboratory studies were conducted. The first experiment showed that the desirability of personality traits varied for different situations and different jobs. The second experiment showed that self-monitoring influenced distortion. It also found that when told to respond as if applying for a job individuals distorted in the direction that was desirable for that job, and not in a uniformly socially desirable manner. Overall the results indicate that individuals can distort personality tests, socially desirable responding is not the same as distortion, the amount and direction of distortion can vary with different jobs, and individual differences can influence distortion. Therefore, meta-analyses that attempt to equate distortion with social desirability, or that fail to account for the effect of the situation, may reach erroneous conclusions. Researchers need to understand the potential variation in distortion strategies for different situations and use this information to determine what type of distortion is expected rather than assuming distortion will occur in a uniform manner.

This study assessed whether the effect of voice on procedural fairness is due to the opportunity to voice or to actual voice behavior. In addition, it examined several possible antecedents of voice behavior. In a laboratory experiment, 100 undergraduates completed measures of personality, self-evaluation, perceived voice instrumentality and opportunity to voice. Opportunity for voice, goal setting, and voice instrumentality were manipulated. The results show that opportunity to voice, but not voice behavior, predicted fairness perceptions. Further, goal setting, perceived instrumentality, conscientiousness, and voice self-efficacy significantly predicted voice behavior. Significant interactions between locus of control and voice instrumentality and goal setting and perceived instrumentality on voice behavior were detected. The implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.

Workers often strive to achieve the financial and psychological benefits that are associated with career success. Accordingly, organizational scholars have investigated the determinants of advancement in organizations. However, despite the increasing proportion of working parents and the potential incongruity between involvement in family and success at work, little research has directly considered the effects of parental status and responsibilities on advancement. This study examines the extent to which both genuine (i.e., self-reported) and perceived (i.e., supervisor-reported) behaviors and attitudes about work and family influence the success of working parents. As such, this is the first study to consider the relative importance of supervisor perceptions of work-family constructs in determining career success. Furthermore, drawing from social role theory, it is predicted and found that stereotypes about working mothers drive biased perceptions about their work attitudes and behaviors. Thus, this research provides empirical evidence to support the widely-held assumption that one mechanism underlying the "maternal wall" is bias toward working mothers.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

<p> Openness to experience is one of the least useful personality predictors in the workplace. The present study tested the notion that openness to experience would be a more effective predictor of tenure and turnover intention if openness to experience was separated into two sub-factors. We used a total sample size of, <i>N</i> = 96, participants, which was analyzed both as a whole and separately, segmented by students (<i>n</i> = 51) and working adults (<i>n</i> = 45). </p><p> The present study was unable to show that the sub-factors of openness to experience were more effective predictors of turnover intention and tenure. Implications of the evidence in the present study are discussed with the conclusion that openness to experience, at the factor and the sub-factor levels, is a weak predictor in the workplace.</p>