Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / No processo escolar de formação de leitores e escritores há um movimento ativo do sujeito com o texto, sendo o professor interlocutor e mediador desse processo. A presente pesquisa pôde verificar como a legitimação do conhecimento de mundo de sujeitos jovens e adultos com pouca ou nenhuma escolarização, em sala de aula, possibilitou o autorreconhecimento da condição de cada um como leitores e escritores. Para chegar a esse achado, investiguei práticas de leitura e escrita em uma classe de educação de jovens e adultos (EJA), buscando relacioná-las aos usos cotidianos da leitura e da escrita na vida dos sujeitos dessa classe. Busquei auxílio em contribuições teóricas de autores do campo da EJA, e de outros, cujos estudos são referência na área da leitura e da escrita e da formação de leitores e escritores, do mesmo modo que fui auxiliada na compreensão de como me valer de procedimentos metodológicos, para melhor capturar as revelações da prática pedagógica, durante o período de observação empreendido na classe. A abordagem teórico-metodológica adotada, de natureza qualitativa, contou com observações sistemáticas e instrumentos como o diário de campo, entrevistas semiestruturadas e uma ficha perfil dos sujeitos da pesquisa. Dispondo desses diversos recursos, pude perceber o processo de formação de leitores e escritores em uma turma já alfabetizada do Programa de Educação de Jovens e Adultos (PEJA) do município do Rio de Janeiro. Como reflexão final de meu estudo, arrisco afirmar que as práticas pedagógicas de leitura e escrita propostas pela professora na turma investigada rompiam com a lógica abissal (como nomeada por SANTOS, 2009), uma vez que as atividades levavam em conta a realidade e os conhecimentos dos sujeitos, não se restringindo a saberes escolares, considerados pela lógica hegemônica de hierarquia de mundo, como os únicos válidos. Outras questões, entretanto, nessas práticas de leitura e escrita puderam ser questionadas, como o fato de as atividades serem individuais, em maioria, apesar dos debates permanentes realizados no coletivo. Também o diálogo prioritariamente se dava entre professora e alunos, e não entre pares, o que restringia a horizontalidade da interlocução entre sujeitos. Por fim, reflexiono quanto à lógica escolar de organização do Programa, em que os avanços na aprendizagem têm sequência serial, o que põe em cheque concepções de continuum na EJA e, em última instância, do direito a aprender por toda a vida. / It is well known that there is an active movement of the subject towards the text, involving the training of readers and writers in school, the teacher being both interlocutor and mediator in the process. Through this investigation, it was possible to demonstrate how the knowledge of the world brought to the classroom by young and adult learners with little or no schooling is legitimized, enabling them to acknowledge their status as readers and writers. To take hold of this finding, a research in reading and writing practices in a youth and adult education classroom (EJA) was carried out, with the purpose of relating them to the practices of reading and writing in those learners daily lives. I have resorted to theoretical contributions from reference studies in reading and writing acquisition and also in the training of readers and writers, that were produced by authors in the field of EJA as well as other areas. Classroom observation also helped us to develop a better understanding of the importance of resorting to methodological procedures as a means to grasp the revelations of the pedagogical practice. The theoretical-methodological approach adopted is of a qualitative kind. It made use of instruments such as a field diary, semi-structured interviews and a profile card, i.e., a card meant to register each subjects profile, besides systematic observation. These instruments were useful to prompt us to perceive what was going on in the readers and writers education process inside a classroom which integrated the Youth and Adult Education Program (PEJA) in that particular municipality of the State of Rio de Janeiro. I dare say that the reading and writing teaching practices proposed by the teacher in the classroom under investigation represented a break from abyssal logic (as nominated in Santos 2009), since the activities carried out took into account the learners life conditions and their own knowledge, not restricting themselves to the school selection of contents, which are looked at by the hegemonic logic in the world hierarchy as the only legitimate knowledge. Nevertheless, other issues related those reading and writing teaching practices could be questioned. One of them is the fact that most of the activities were done individually, although debates were conducted permanently with the participation of the whole group. Furthermore, the dialogues involved primarily teacher and students, instead of students and their peers. This practice limited the horizontal interaction among subjects. Finally, I think that the organization of the Program was inspired in the school logic, which requires that the learning process advances along a serial sequence, thus questioning the concept of continuum maintained by EJA and, ultimately, the students right to lifelong education.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / No processo escolar de formação de leitores e escritores há um movimento ativo do sujeito com o texto, sendo o professor interlocutor e mediador desse processo. A presente pesquisa pôde verificar como a legitimação do conhecimento de mundo de sujeitos jovens e adultos com pouca ou nenhuma escolarização, em sala de aula, possibilitou o autorreconhecimento da condição de cada um como leitores e escritores. Para chegar a esse achado, investiguei práticas de leitura e escrita em uma classe de educação de jovens e adultos (EJA), buscando relacioná-las aos usos cotidianos da leitura e da escrita na vida dos sujeitos dessa classe. Busquei auxílio em contribuições teóricas de autores do campo da EJA, e de outros, cujos estudos são referência na área da leitura e da escrita e da formação de leitores e escritores, do mesmo modo que fui auxiliada na compreensão de como me valer de procedimentos metodológicos, para melhor capturar as revelações da prática pedagógica, durante o período de observação empreendido na classe. A abordagem teórico-metodológica adotada, de natureza qualitativa, contou com observações sistemáticas e instrumentos como o diário de campo, entrevistas semiestruturadas e uma ficha perfil dos sujeitos da pesquisa. Dispondo desses diversos recursos, pude perceber o processo de formação de leitores e escritores em uma turma já alfabetizada do Programa de Educação de Jovens e Adultos (PEJA) do município do Rio de Janeiro. Como reflexão final de meu estudo, arrisco afirmar que as práticas pedagógicas de leitura e escrita propostas pela professora na turma investigada rompiam com a lógica abissal (como nomeada por SANTOS, 2009), uma vez que as atividades levavam em conta a realidade e os conhecimentos dos sujeitos, não se restringindo a saberes escolares, considerados pela lógica hegemônica de hierarquia de mundo, como os únicos válidos. Outras questões, entretanto, nessas práticas de leitura e escrita puderam ser questionadas, como o fato de as atividades serem individuais, em maioria, apesar dos debates permanentes realizados no coletivo. Também o diálogo prioritariamente se dava entre professora e alunos, e não entre pares, o que restringia a horizontalidade da interlocução entre sujeitos. Por fim, reflexiono quanto à lógica escolar de organização do Programa, em que os avanços na aprendizagem têm sequência serial, o que põe em cheque concepções de continuum na EJA e, em última instância, do direito a aprender por toda a vida. / It is well known that there is an active movement of the subject towards the text, involving the training of readers and writers in school, the teacher being both interlocutor and mediator in the process. Through this investigation, it was possible to demonstrate how the knowledge of the world brought to the classroom by young and adult learners with little or no schooling is legitimized, enabling them to acknowledge their status as readers and writers. To take hold of this finding, a research in reading and writing practices in a youth and adult education classroom (EJA) was carried out, with the purpose of relating them to the practices of reading and writing in those learners daily lives. I have resorted to theoretical contributions from reference studies in reading and writing acquisition and also in the training of readers and writers, that were produced by authors in the field of EJA as well as other areas. Classroom observation also helped us to develop a better understanding of the importance of resorting to methodological procedures as a means to grasp the revelations of the pedagogical practice. The theoretical-methodological approach adopted is of a qualitative kind. It made use of instruments such as a field diary, semi-structured interviews and a profile card, i.e., a card meant to register each subjects profile, besides systematic observation. These instruments were useful to prompt us to perceive what was going on in the readers and writers education process inside a classroom which integrated the Youth and Adult Education Program (PEJA) in that particular municipality of the State of Rio de Janeiro. I dare say that the reading and writing teaching practices proposed by the teacher in the classroom under investigation represented a break from abyssal logic (as nominated in Santos 2009), since the activities carried out took into account the learners life conditions and their own knowledge, not restricting themselves to the school selection of contents, which are looked at by the hegemonic logic in the world hierarchy as the only legitimate knowledge. Nevertheless, other issues related those reading and writing teaching practices could be questioned. One of them is the fact that most of the activities were done individually, although debates were conducted permanently with the participation of the whole group. Furthermore, the dialogues involved primarily teacher and students, instead of students and their peers. This practice limited the horizontal interaction among subjects. Finally, I think that the organization of the Program was inspired in the school logic, which requires that the learning process advances along a serial sequence, thus questioning the concept of continuum maintained by EJA and, ultimately, the students right to lifelong education.

Les adultes allophones peu ou pas scolarisés (AAPPS) rencontrent des défis pour effectuer des tâches essentielles dans la société québécoise en raison de leurs compétences langagières limitées. Leur intégration socioculturelle et professionnelle s’avère donc difficile et soulève des enjeux socioéconomiques tant pour les AAPPS que pour la société en pénurie de main-d’œuvre. En apprenant le français dans le contexte formel de scolarité, les AAPPS font face à d’autres défis d’acculturation aux conventions scolaires, notamment aux évaluations formelles des apprentissages. En étudiant les particularités des AAPPS, Abbott et al. (2021), de même que Gonzalves (2020) ont mis en question l’évaluation de ce public parce qu’elle est faite de l’angle des personnes scolarisées sans considérer la perspective des AAPPS. Quant à Altherr Flores (2020), elle a critiqué la tendance à supposer que les AAPPS comprenaient l’évaluation alors qu’ils ignoraient les attentes des évaluateurs et leur rôle comme évalué selon Simpson (2006). Ces préoccupations soulèvent des enjeux éthiques d’équité, de diversité et de différenciation pédagogique pour une évaluation adéquate, d’où l’intérêt au sens de l’expérience évaluative aux yeux des AAPPS en cours formelle de francisation. Pour ce faire, l’approche phénoménologique de Giorgi (1997) permet d’étudier l’expérience des phénomènes vécus telle que comprise par les acteurs sociaux. L’analyse de six entretiens individuels semi-dirigés menés en arabe maghrébin, auprès de six participantes issues du Maghreb, permet de comprendre l’expérience évaluative des AAPPS comme un processus dynamique et continu d’exploration, d’acculturation et de maturation. L’exploration met en relief les premières expériences évaluatives caractérisées par la confrontation à la nouveauté, la surprise, le stress et le choc de l’échec. En acculturation, les AAPPS approprient l’évaluation et développent des stratégies pour réussir et pour gérer le stress qui diminue, mais demeure présent. Et en maturation, elles et ils réfléchissent sur leur évaluation, échec et réussite en lien avec leur besoin et habileté à l’extérieur de la classe. Ces résultats contribuent à éclairer les angles morts de l’expérience évaluative des AAPPS et présentent un appui pour les conceptrices et concepteurs des évaluations visant ce public. / Allophone adults with little or no schooling (AAPPS) face challenges in performing essential tasks in Quebec because of their limited language skills. Their socio-cultural and professional integration is therefore difficult and raises socio-economic issues both for the AAPPS and for the society facing a labour shortage. Learning French in the context of formal schooling, AAPPS face challenges related to acculturation to school conventions, particularly those of formal learning assessment. Based on the particularities of AAPPS, Abbott et al. (2021) as well as Gonzalves (2020) have questioned the assessment of this audience because it is made from the angle of educated people without considering the perspective of AAPPS. As for Altherr Flores (2020), she criticized the tendency to assume that AAPPS understood the assessment while ignoring the fact that AAPPS might misunderstand the expectations of the evaluators and their role as evaluated according to Simpson (2006). These concerns raise ethical issues of equity, diversity, and pedagogical differentiation for an adequate assessment, hence the interest in the meaning that the AAPPS give to their assessment experience in the formal francization course. The phenomenological approach of Giorgi (1997) makes it possible to study the experience of lived phenomena as understood by social actors. The analysis of the six semi-directed individual interviews conducted with six participants from the Maghreb in Maghrebi Arabic, allows us to understand the evaluative experience of the AAPPS as a dynamic and continuous process of exploration, acculturation, and maturation. Exploration concerns the first evaluative experiences characterized by the confrontation with novelty, surprise, stress, and the shock of failure. In the acculturation phase, AAPPS appropriate assessment and develop strategies to succeed and manage stress that diminishes but remains present. And in maturation, they reflect on their assessment, failure, and success in relation to their needs and abilities outside the classroom. These results shed light on blind spots of the AAPPS assessment experience and provide support for designers of assessment aimed at this audience.