Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 152-166).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2002. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references. Available also from UMI Company.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2001. / Appendix F in Spanish. Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 68-73). Also available on the Internet.

Thesis (Ed. D.)--West Virginia University, 1999. / Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 93-104).

Thesis (Ed. D.)--West Virginia University, 2003. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains viii, 172 p. : ill. (some col.). Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 116-138).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2001. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 127-139). Available also in a digital version from Dissertation Abstracts.

Not available / text

This experimental study was conducted to examine the relative effectiveness of a Repeated Reading (RR) and Wide Reading (WR) intervention when compared to typical instruction on secondary struggling readers' comprehension, fluency, and word reading. The sample consisted of a total of 96 students (9th through 12th grade) ranging in age from 13-17 in special education reading and English classrooms. Participants included students with learning disabilities (LD), dyslexia, or students selected as students with significant reading difficulties. The investigator paired students on variables of interest (i.e., reading level) within classes and then randomly assigned pairs to one of three groups: repeated reading (N=33), wide reading (N=34), or typical instruction (N=29). Tutors, trained by the investigator, monitored students as they worked in pairs in each treatment condition. Intervention was provided daily for approximately 15-20 minutes for 10 weeks. Treatment effects for each outcome measure were estimated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results indicate no overall statistically significant differences for any condition. Effects ranged from -.81 to .28 usually hovering around no effect or favoring the C condition over the treatment conditions or favoring the RR condition over the WR condition. Five separate ANCOVAs were conducted using the following dependent variables with each pretest score used as a covariate: (1) Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement III (WJIII) Passage Comprehension subtest (RR vs. C = -.10; WR vs. C = -.20; RR vs. WR= .10); (2) Test of Silent Reading Fluency (TOSRE) (RR vs. C =.-31; WR vs. C = -.81; RR vs. WR= .10); (3) Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement III (WJIII) Letter-Word Identification subtest (RR vs. C = -.05; WR vs. C = -.11; RR vs. WR = .06); (4) AIMSWeb Oral Reading Fluency System (RR vs. C = -.08; WR vs. C = -.26; RR vs. WR= .18); and (5) Test of Silent Contextual Reading Fluency (RR vs. C =.28; WR vs. C = -.01; RR vs. WR= .28). Results indicate that neither RR nor WR should be implemented for secondary readers with significant reading difficulties and more research into ways to make fluency instruction more explicit and instructional for these students is warranted.

No description available.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of linguistic competence in developmental dyslexia. This was done to determine whether there existed subgroups of dyslexics classified according to linguistic criteria. / Two groups, a control group of normal readers and an experimental group of dyslexic readers, were compased using a series of reading tasks that measured certain components of linguistic competence. / A quantitative analysis between groups revealed differences at the level of linguistic competence. A qualitative analysis of the dyslexic group revealed the existence of three subgroups: a morphological subgroup, a Cloze grammatical subgroup, and a Cloze lexical subgroup. / The study indicates a need for further research in the diagnosis of language deficits in beginning readers to prevent reading problems.