Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-07-04T15:02:40Z No. of bitstreams: 1 LucianoLuizDaSilvaJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 2133997 bytes, checksum: 0cac4f4fc4430aae598b37a984f70b9b (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-07-14T15:04:44Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 LucianoLuizDaSilvaJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 2133997 bytes, checksum: 0cac4f4fc4430aae598b37a984f70b9b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-14T15:04:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LucianoLuizDaSilvaJunior_DISSERT.pdf: 2133997 bytes, checksum: 0cac4f4fc4430aae598b37a984f70b9b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-08-23 / A aten??o ao c?ncer ? uma prioridade da sa?de p?blica mundial, por?m, ainda nos dias de hoje, persistem falhas simples capazes de repercutir em aumento da morbimortalidade dos pacientes. O registro inadequado de informa??es cl?nicas leva ? repeti??o de exames, erros de diagn?stico e tratamento, perda de tempo e custos desnecess?rios.Este trabalhoobjetivou verificara efic?cia de um ciclo de melhoria nos registros m?dicosde um hospital de refer?ncia em oncologia, avaliando o n?vel de qualidade no preenchimento dos prontu?rios, identificando os crit?rios de qualidade que mais apresentaram erros e analisando a efetividade dos ciclos de avalia??o cont?nua na melhoria da qualidade do preenchimento dos prontu?rios. Para tanto, dez crit?rios de qualidade em prontu?rios de pacientescom diagn?stico de c?ncer de pr?stata foram examinados. A partir de amostragens aleat?rias simples, procedeu-se ?aprecia??o desses crit?rios, antes e depois das interven??es propostas. Tais a??es envolveram administradores e m?dicos, sendo direcionadas especialmente ? conscientiza??o m?dica e reestrutura??o do prontu?rio por interm?dio de um checklist.No intuito de identificar o n?vel de qualidade, selecionaram-se a estimativa pontual e o intervalo de confian?a (95%) do cumprimento dos crit?rios. Para comprovar a efetividade das interven??es, foram calculadas as melhorias absoluta e relativa entre a primeira e ?ltima avalia??o, assim como a sua significa??o estat?stica (p<0,05). Na medi??o inicial, verificaram-se ?ndices de cumprimento de 66,4% na m?dia e um total de 411 de n?o conformidades, significando 34,2% de n?o cumprimento. Destacaram-se, como maior e menor percentual de n?o cumprimento, os crit?rios patologias associadas, 81,9%, e estadiamento?TNM, 9,5%. J?, na segunda medi??o, notou-se uma redu??o do n?mero total de defeitos em 49,4%. Em suma, a avalia??o baseada em crit?rios possibilitou a identifica??o de defeitos de qualidade no preenchimento dos prontu?rios levantados, o que, por sua vez, direcionou as interven??es propostas. Considerando as melhorias alcan?adas, percebe-se que o ciclo de melhoria foi efetivo na diminui??o dos defeitos observados, al?m de auxiliar expressivamente no progresso da qualidade do registro m?dico. / In spite of the fact that attention to cancer is a global public health priority, simple failures capable of resonating in the increase of morbidity and mortality of patients still persist nowadays. The Inadequate recording of clinical information leads to the repetition of tests, diagnostic and treatment errors, waste of time and unnecessary costs. This study aims at verifying the effectiveness of a cycle of improvement of medical records in a referral hospital in oncology, by evaluating the level of quality in filling in the patient?s medical records, identifying the quality criteria that presents the greater amount of errors and analyzing the effectiveness of the continuous evaluation cycles that contributed to the improvement of the quality of filling in the patient?s medical records. To this end, ten quality criteria in medical records of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were examined. From simple random sampling, these criteria were assessed before and after the proposed interventions. Such actions involved administrators and doctors, being directed especially at medical awareness and restructuring of the patient?s medical records via a checklist. In order to identify the level of quality, the point-in-time estimate and confidence interval (95%) of the criteria compliance were selected. In order to prove the effectiveness of interventions, the absolute and relative improvements between the first and the final evaluation, as well as its statistical significance (p < 0.05) were calculated. Compliance rates of 66.4%, on average, and a total of 411 nonconformities, meaning 34.2% of non-compliance were verified in the initial measurement. The associated pathologies criteria, 81.9%, and staging - TNM, 9.5%, stood out as the highest and lowest percentage of non-compliance. In the second measurement, a reduction in the total number of defects of 49.4% was observed. In short, the criteria-based evaluation made possible the identification of quality defects in filling in the surveyed patient?s medical records, which, in turn, directed the proposed interventions. Considering the improvements achieved, it is reasonable to assume that the cycle of improvement was effective in decreasing the defects observed, besides contributing significantly to the progress of quality of the medical record.