Submitted by Rafael Cardim (rafaelcardim1@hotmail.com) on 2012-05-08T19:04:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Cardim_Dissertação_versão final.pdf: 914269 bytes, checksum: 7686e0a9a428b524ef1be77a2abe3ce8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Gisele Isaura Hannickel (gisele.hannickel@fgv.br) on 2012-05-08T19:28:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Cardim_Dissertação_versão final.pdf: 914269 bytes, checksum: 7686e0a9a428b524ef1be77a2abe3ce8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2012-05-08T19:29:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cardim_Dissertação_versão final.pdf: 914269 bytes, checksum: 7686e0a9a428b524ef1be77a2abe3ce8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 16-04-12 / O objetivo desse artigo é estimar o efeito-preço das transferências incondicionais, condicionais e da renda para os municípios brasileiros. De acordo com Dahlby (2011) um aumento de transferência lump-sum tem, além do efeito renda, um efeito preço decorrente do uso de impostos distorcivos. Dessa forma, um governo local que recebe uma transferência lump-sum, pode diminuir o custo marginal de financiamento público (MCF) e permanecer com o mesmo nível de serviço. Assim, o efeito gasto das transferências pode ser maior do que o decorrente da renda, explicando o flypaper effect. Usando dados de impostos sobre propriedade (IPTU), primeiramente calculamos o custo marginal de financiamento público (MCF) deste imposto. Em seguida, estimamos se as transferências lump-sum efetivamente diminuem o custo marginal de financiamento público (MCF). / This study aims to estimate the price effect of unconditional transfers, conditional and income to Brazilian municipalities. According Dahlby (2011) an increase in lump-sum transfer has, besides the income effect, a price effect resulting from the use of distortionary taxation. A local government that receives a transfer can reduce the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) and stay with the same level of service. Thus, the spending effect of transfer may be greater than that reflected in the income, explaining the flypaper effect. Using data from property taxes (IPTU), first we calculate the marginal cost of public funds (MCF). Then, we estimate that the different transfers effectively reduce the marginal cost of public funds (MCF).

This masters thesis focuses on real estate taxation in the Czech Republic and Great Britain. The theoretical part of this thesis presents the tax system in both countries as well as basic information about property taxes and the system of taxation of property. The practical part of this thesis consists mainly of model examples of taxation of real estate intended for housing and real estate with commercial use. Part of this work is also aimed at comparing the tax burden. The comparison of taxes on property in both countries is made by comparing taxes on property with GDP and with total taxation. The final part of this thesis compares the tax burden in both countries by using the results from the model examples.