Submitted by JOSIANE SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA (josianeso) on 2018-05-08T16:50:46Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Arthur Müller Fiedler_.pdf: 22598610 bytes, checksum: 11acf1db9e40cbe9e9ee1f83f9d058bc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-08T16:50:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Arthur Müller Fiedler_.pdf: 22598610 bytes, checksum: 11acf1db9e40cbe9e9ee1f83f9d058bc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-04-18 / Nenhuma / A convenção de cláusulas arbitrais escalonadas permite arranjar contratualmente os diferentes métodos adequados de solução de conflitos (ADR) com o objetivo de resolver os mais diversos tipos de disputas empresariais no âmbito nacional e internacional. Este estudo tem por objetivo identificar se a convenção de cláusulas arbitrais escalonadas em instrumentos contratuais é eficiente para a solução de conflitos empresariais no Brasil. Para tanto, recorreu-se a revisão bibliográfica e identificou-se que o tema permite um estudo de caráter exploratório, a fim de investigar a percepção de eficiência do instituto no âmbito das câmaras de mediação e arbitragem brasileiras. Dessa forma, foram aplicados questionários com presidentes, diretores e gerentes jurídicos de 18 (dezoito) câmaras de mediação e arbitragem, dentre às quais, 8 (oito) das câmaras mais relevantes do Brasil, o que possibilitou a coleta de dados e a análise do conteúdo. A pesquisa contribui com diversos elementos de análise da eficiência das cláusulas arbitrais escalonadas, contudo, para o presente trabalho, foram definidos alguns critérios, como frequência e volume, vantagens, desvantagens, motivos e razões de utilização ou não pelas empresas, aplicações práticas por tipo de conflito e, por fim, eficiência para a solução de disputas. Os resultados da pesquisa oferecem elementos conclusivos de que a convenção de cláusulas arbitrais escalonadas em instrumentos contratuais trata-se de uma ferramenta em pleno crescimento e desenvolvimento, ágil e frequentemente eficiente na solução de diversos tipos de conflitos empresariais no Brasil. / The dispute resolution clause allows contractual arrangements to be made for the different alternative methods of dispute resolution (ADR) in order to solve the most diverse types of business disputes in the national and international scope. The purpose of this study is to identify whether the dispute resolution clauses in contractual instruments are effective for resolving corporate disputes in Brazil. To do so, we resorted to the bibliographic review and it was identified that the theme allows an exploratory study, in order to investigate the perception of efficiency of the institute within the Brazilian mediation and arbitration chambers. Thus, questionnaires were administered to presidents, directors and managers of 18 mediation and arbitration chambers, including 8 of the most relevant chambers in Brazil, which enabled data collection and content analysis. The research contributes with several elements of analysis of the efficiency of dispute resolution clauses, however, for the present work, some criteria were defined, such as frequency and volume, advantages, disadvantages, reasons of use or not by companies, practical applications by type of conflict and, ultimately, efficiency in general. The results of the research offer conclusive evidence that the agreement of dispute resolution clause in contractual instruments is a fast growing and agile and often efficient tool for solving various types of business conflicts in Brazil.

Le contentieux contractuel éclate lorsque l'une des parties n'exécute plus ou pas ses obligations. La préoccupation essentielle en matière contractuelle, consiste à lutter contre une rupture abusive et arbitraire du contrat. La particularité du droit civil français en matière de rupture du contrat, est la place très importante qu'occupe le juge judiciaire. L'assurance de la protection des intérêts des parties et la garantie d'une sanction juste et équitable, reposent en effet, sur les épaules du juge. Il est par conséquent inconcevable que le juge soit écarté du jeu de la rupture contractuelle. L'orientation traditionnelle a toujours fait du juge un pilier dans le domaine de la séparation contractuelle, mais cette tendance commence quelque peu à se dissiper. Le juge doit toujours jouer un rôle très important en droit des contrats en général et dans sa rupture en particulier. Une protection efficace des parties donnerait à l'intervention du juge une utilité plus importante. Il est primordial, que le juge soit un acteur, en matière de rupture contractuelle, dont le rôle serait la garantie du respect des lois et la protection complète des parties ; le cas contraire, pourrait réduire alors la portée du code civil actuel à un simple catalogue de lois régissant l'anéantissement du contrat. / Contractual litigation arises when one of the parties fails to fulfill its obligations. Its main concern is to fight against abusive and arbitrary breach of contracts. In the French civil law, the judge occupies a very important place when debating breach of contracts. It is impossible to alienate the judge when it comes down to contract breaches. In fact, he insures that the interests of every concerned party are protected. He also guarantees that fair and equitable sanctions will be applied. Traditionally, the judge was very important when discussing breach of contracts. However, this trend is beginning to dissipate. In general, the judge plays a very important role in contract law, but his role is primordial when disputing contract termination. Effective protection of the parties would give the intervention of the judge a greater utility. It is essential that the judge remains an important actor when it comes to breach of contract as his role is to guarantee that the law is respected and that every party is adequately protected. On the contrary, it could reduce the importance of the current Civil Code to a mere catalog of laws governing the annulment contracts