The Position of Review Appeal in the System of Remedies Abstract What is the purpose of the review appeal in civil matters? Should the review appeal be of an ordinary or extraordinary nature? Should the admissibility requirements of the review appeal be determined entirely objectively, or should it depend, at least in part, on the subjective discretion of the appellate court? This is only a part of numerous questions that have accompanied the institute of review appeal for several historical stages and, due to the planned overall re- codification of the civil procedure law, these issues remain relevant even today. The author of this work aims to provide an answer to some of these questions based on a critical view of the historical development of the review appeal, current legislation concerning this matter and the review appeal from de lege ferenda perspective. In the first chapter, the author generally discusses remedies in civil proceedings, their nature, effects, and definition of the review appeal. The greatest attention is paid to the purposes of the review appeal, which include finding individual justice and unifying the decision-making practice of the civil courts. In the second chapter, the author focuses in detail on the historical development of the institute of review appeal. Its important...

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2016-08-16T12:32:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Carlos Eduardo Corrêa de Morais.pdf: 1176567 bytes, checksum: 258a5d3f0f3c494636d60fddae515e86 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-16T12:32:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Carlos Eduardo Corrêa de Morais.pdf: 1176567 bytes, checksum: 258a5d3f0f3c494636d60fddae515e86 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-27 / This paper has as main scope to identify and establish the consequences arising from the delayed analysis of the necessary requirements for acceptance of the reviews appeals that were discontinued by the Regional Labor Court, proceeding that will take place only after the appeal that represents the dispute is judged by the Superior Labor Court, in accordance with the Law No. 13,015, of July 21, 2014, which included the Article 896-C in the Brazilian Labor Code, regulated by the Act No. 491/SEGJUD.GP of September 23, 2014, deep diving into the possibility of applying a predominant thesis or Court Precedent to the discontinued appeals or without the proper observance of the legal requirements established in the legal model. Therefore, it firstly presents the main relevant characteristics of the res judicata and the cases in which there is irradiation effects with their flexibility, followed by the analysis of the judgment of the repeated appeal to determine, with proportionality, weighing the constitutional principles of legal security and isonomy, in thesis, colliding with the proposed analysis. The considerations presented are anchored in doctrine, as well as recent and controversial understanding of Regional Labor Courts and Superior Labor Court on the subject. By last, the conclusions are intended to systematize those cases where even not admitting an appeal, should be overcome formal obstacle, perhaps the immutability arising from the final judgment, so that the stir receives similar solution as established by the Superior Labor Court / O presente trabalho tem como escopo precípuo identificar e estabelecer os reflexos decorrentes da análise diferida de admissibilidade dos recursos de revista sobrestados nos Tribunais Regionais de origem, procedida somente depois do julgamento do recurso de revista representativo da controvérsia perante o Tribunal Superior do Trabalho, na forma prevista pela Lei nº13.015, de 21 de julho de 2014, que incluiu o artigo 896-C, da CLT, regulado pelo Ato nº491/SEGJUD.GP, de 23 de setembro de 2014, afunilando a possibilidade de aplicação da tese prevalecente ou súmula de jurisprudência aos recursos inadmissíveis ou sem a observância de pressuposto recursal estabelecido pelo modelo legal. Para tanto, apresentam-se inicialmente as características relevantes da coisa julgada e as hipóteses em que há irradiação de seus efeitos, seguindo-se à análise do regime de julgamento de recurso de revista repetitivo para fixar, então, com fulcro na proporcionalidade, a ponderação entre os princípios constitucionais da segurança jurídica e da isonomia, em tese, colidentes na análise proposta. As considerações apresentadas ancoram-se na doutrina e no entendimento recente e ainda controvertido dos Tribunais Regionais e Superiores acerca da matéria. Por derradeiro, as conclusões pretendem sistematizar aqueles casos em que mesmo não admitido o recurso de revista, deverá ser superado o empecilho formal, quiçá a imutabilidade advinda da autoridade imanente do trânsito em julgado, a fim de que a demanda receba solução idêntica àquela estabelecida pelo Tribunal Superior do Trabalho

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2017-02-16T12:31:32Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Rafael Ferraresi Holanda Cavalcante.pdf: 864853 bytes, checksum: 9b31699cfc22cf63e1bbda055fc51fe1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-16T12:31:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rafael Ferraresi Holanda Cavalcante.pdf: 864853 bytes, checksum: 9b31699cfc22cf63e1bbda055fc51fe1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-09 / The review appeal to the Superior Labor Court – TST, to have their actually tried merit, needs to be known. As it is an extraordinary instance it was created prerequisites for this knowledge. To review appeal apply generic appellate assumptions, belonging to all resources, and the more specific the measure appropriateness. As generics are: collapsing, representation, preparation and timing. Specific assumptions have the jurisprudential harvest, normative, legalistic and constitutional, provided for in art. 896 of the Labor Code. So it remains therefore direct the course of this work, for specific assumptions (= art. 896 of the Labor Code) of admissibility of review appeal. Or more simply, the cases of "appropriateness" of this resource in order to be able to assess how much there is of influence on the analysis of requirements for labor courts, especially the TST, to ensure the protection and effectiveness of the fundamental right called " reasonable length of proceedings "(art. 5, LXXVIII, of the Federal Constitution) / O recurso de revista para o Tribunal Superior do Trabalho – TST, para ter seu mérito efetivamente julgado, precisa ser conhecido. Como se trata de uma instância extraordinária foram criados pré-requisitos para esse conhecimento. Ao recurso de revista se aplicam os pressupostos recursais genéricos, pertencentes a todos os recursos, e mais os específicos de cabimento da medida. Como genéricos tem-se: Sucumbência, representação, preparo e tempestividade. Como pressupostos específicos tem-se os de seara jurisprudencial, normativa, legalista e constitucional, previstos no art. 896 da CLT. Sendo assim, restará, portanto, dirigir o rumo deste trabalho, para os pressupostos específicos (= art. 896 da CLT) de admissibilidade do recurso de revista. Ou mais simplesmente, os casos de “cabimento” desse recurso, a fim de que se possa avaliar o quanto há de influência na análise desses requisitos pelos tribunais trabalhistas, em especial o TST, para garantir a tutela e a efetividade do direito fundamental chamado “razoável duração do processo” (art. 5º, LXXVIII, da Constituição Federal)