Spelling suggestions: "subject:"rhetoric inn then bible."" "subject:"rhetoric inn then cible.""
41 |
Leiden im ersten Petrusbrief : Ursprünge, Formen und Strategien der Bewältigung / Suffering in First Peter : origin, forms and strategies for copingGraser, Aaron 12 February 2013 (has links)
German text / Die vorliegende Arbeit setzt sich mit der zentralen Leidensthematik des Ersten Petrusbriefes
auseinander. Einer vorläufigen Betrachtung der Entwicklung und des Gebrauchs des zentralen Leidens-
Begriffs folgt die ausführliche Untersuchung und Darstellung der Urheber des Leidens und der
Ursachen und Gründe für rechtes und falsches Leiden. Es folgt unter Berücksichtigung einiger
kulturanthropologischer Einsichten und moderner psychologischer Analysen bezüglich der Wirkung
von verbaler Gewalt eine Betrachtung der Arten und Formen des Leidens sowie der Begründungen und
Ziele des Leiden. Der zweite Hauptteil untersucht Verhaltensanweisungen, Trost und Anleitung zur
Leidensbewältigung, die der Verfasser seinen Empfängern zukommen lässt. Dabei wird zum einen ein
Vergleich zwischen den Aussagen des Ersten Petrusbriefs und der antiken Konsolationsliteratur
vorgenommen, zum anderen zwischen den vorgeschlagenen Bewältigungsstrategien des Briefes und
den Strategien der modernen Sozialpsychologie zum hilfreichen Umgang mit Diskriminierung und
Verfolgung. Abschließend werden die zentralen Beobachtungen zusammengefasst. / This dissertation addresses the central theme of suffering in the First Epistle of Peter. After a
detailed survey of research, it begins with an examination of the development and use of the
terminology for suffering. This is followed by a thorough examination of the origin of suffering
and the causes and reasons for right and false suffering. Careful attention to Greek
lexicography and grammar is combined with rhetorical criticism. Analysis of both the forms of
suffering and the reasons and purposes of suffering is combined with insights from cultural
anthropology and modern studies of the effects of verbal violence. The second main part
examines the behavioural instructions, comfort and ways of coping with suffering.
Furthermore, 1 Peter is compared with the comfort given in various ancient consolation
literatures. In addition, the strategies for coping with discrimination and suffering in 1 Peter are
compared to insights from modern social psychology. A concluding chapter summarises the
results and reflects on their present-day significance. / New Testament / M. Th. (New Testament)
|
42 |
From self-praise to self-boasting : Paul's unmasking of the conflicting rhetorico-linguistic phenomena in 1 CorinthiansDonahoe, Kate C. January 2008 (has links)
The thesis, entitled “From Self-Praise to Self-Boasting: Paul’s Unmasking of the Conflicting Rhetorico-Linguistic Phenomena in 1 Corinthians,” examines the rhetorical conventions of “boasting” and self-praise among those vying for social status and honor within the Greco-Roman world. While the terminological options for “boasting” and self-praise frequently overlap, a survey of these conventions demonstrates that the ancients possessed a categorical distinction between “boasting” and self-praise, which oftentimes conflicted with Paul’s distinction. Clear examples of this conflict appear in 1 Cor 1:10-4:21; 5:1-13; 9:1-27; 13:1-13; and 15:30-32, where Paul addresses the Corinthians’ overestimation of wisdom and eloquence, redirects the Corinthians’ attention away from loyalties to specific leaders to loyalty to Christ, redefines the standards by which the Corinthians should view themselves and their leaders, counters the Corinthians’ tendency to engage in anthropocentric “boasting,” and affirms his own apostolic ministry. It is the Corinthian community’s inability to grasp the application of theocentric “boasting” which leads Paul to address certain aspects and values of secular Corinth that have penetrated the Corinthian community. Thus, operating from an eschatological perspective, Paul critiques both the Corinthians’ attitudes and the Greco-Roman cultural values upon which their attitudes are based. Through irony, self-presentation, imitation, differentiating between theocentric and anthropocentric “boasting,” and distinguishing between personality and gospel rhetoric, Paul challenges the secular notions of social status, power, wisdom, leadership, and patronage and exhorts the Corinthians to focus their attention on their relationship with the Lord rather than on improving their social status or on increasing their honor.
|
Page generated in 0.0717 seconds