Thesis (honors)--Georgia State University, 2007. / Title from file title page. Robert Howard, thesis advisor. Electronic text (50 p.) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed Jan 17, 2008. Includes bibliographical references (p. 48-50).

The Worker´s Party of Social Justice is the most significant far right party in the Czech Republic. This work deals with its ideological basis while emphasis is placed on the conception of nation and the attitude towards the political systém and a charakterization of its development too. The first two chapters focus on the analysis of the predecessor: the Worker's Party which in its third phase adopted the German national socialism from the National Democratic Party of Germany. Within the new approach it adopted the notion of white Europeanism which is a contemporaty Aryan rase. The second two chapters contain the analyses of ideological postulates of the Worker's Party of Social Justice which continues to co-operate with the National Democratic Party of Gemany and to adopt its attitudes and strategy. The basis of identity of the Worker's Party of Social Justice is white Europeanism which is common for all native European nations. Incompatibility of some of its attitudes with the values of representative democracy makes it an anti-system party.

為增加國有土地供給，眾所周知，政府將提供國有土地使用權，但事實上，一般人很難取得此一種利，因為國有地使用權已因缺乏土地市場觀念和現行運作失靈的制度而僵化，導致國有地資源被占用和破壞情形嚴重，顯示國有土地供給和有效利用之困境問題。 本文依據國有地特性和“所有權與使用權分離”理論，探尋一個新的財產權－「一元化使用權，以為解決此一問題之法，依此新制，讓使用權人--公部門或私部門於繳納合理費用後，均能於較長期間內使用、收益、抵押、出租和轉讓使用權，達成國有地資源永續利用之目的。 / In order to Increase the national land supply，as we know，the goverflthent will provide national land nith its use right， But， in fact， national land use right is not easy toobtain by the general public，due to the lack of land marketing concept and the failure of system operation， its exertion become so rigid. This Is the reason that national land resources was occupied 1llegally and destroyed seriously in Taiwan．It reveals that the national land supply and its efficient utilization encounter somewhat dilemma. Accoroing to characteristics of national and the theory of detaching ownership from use right. We should search for a new property right“an unified land use right”to soive its problems.Under this new system，the user，either private sector or public sector, after paying a reasonable fee or rent，can obtain the use right of the national land to use, income, to mortgage, to lease, and to transfer in a longer duration, so that the land use in sustainable stat.

La protection diplomatique, autrefois institution centrale des relations internationales peut-elle être considérée aujourd’hui comme une sorte de vieil outil désormais rarement utilisé et promis sans doute très prochainement à un rangement définitif au grenier des concepts d’antan ? On pourrait au vue des mécanismes de protection internationale des droits de l’homme répondre par l’affirmative. Il ne s’agit nullement d’enterrer définitivement l’institution, mais de la replacer dans le contexte qui est celui de l’évolution d’autres mécanismes de protection des droits individuels dans le système international. Quel est l’état du droit applicable sur la mise en œuvre de la protection diplomatique ? Existe-t-il des instruments internationaux protégeant les nationaux à l’étranger en dehors de la protection diplomatique ?Le principe de souveraineté peut-il peut devenir un obstacle pour l’individu ou l’Etat protecteur dans l’exercice de la protection diplomatique ? Peut- on parler de protection diplomatique en écartant systématiquement la souveraineté des Etats ?La protection internationale des droits de l’homme concurrence t-elle l’exercice de la protection diplomatique ? / Diplomatic protection, formally the central institution of international relations could be considered today as a guiding tool, rarely used and could be definitely put aside of antan concepts ? We could from the observation of certain mechanisms of international protection of human right answer by affirmations. These allegations do not mean a definite putting aside of the institution, but a reiterations in a context whereby other mechanisms geared to protect human rights evaluate in an international system. What is the state of the law applied in the implementation of diplomatic protection? Do international instruments protecting nationals abroad exist apart from diplomatic protection?Could the principle of sovereignty be an obstacle for an individual or the state protector in the implementation of diplomatic protection? Could we talk of diplomatic protection while putting aside systematically the sovereignty of States? Does international protection of human rights compete with the exercising of diplomatic protection?