Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-08-27T00:23:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 LeovigildoMelgacoTolentinoNeto_DISSERT.pdf: 932895 bytes, checksum: 215339bf6ea8e7be4ef2d24883c35d90 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-09-02T00:35:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 LeovigildoMelgacoTolentinoNeto_DISSERT.pdf: 932895 bytes, checksum: 215339bf6ea8e7be4ef2d24883c35d90 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-02T00:35:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LeovigildoMelgacoTolentinoNeto_DISSERT.pdf: 932895 bytes, checksum: 215339bf6ea8e7be4ef2d24883c35d90 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-04 / O debate sobre industrializa??o est? arraigado a uma cl?ssica pol?mica dentro da economia, que ganhou f?lego ao longo do s?culo XX: planejamento e intervencionismo, de um lado, versus livre mercado do outro. Essa pesquisa busca reacender o debate sobre industrializa??o tomando como foco a cl?ssica discuss?o acerca do planejamento econ?mico, ocorrida na d?cada de 1940, durante o governo Vargas, entre Eugenio Gudin e Roberto Simonsen. O objetivo ? expor como o pensamento expostos pelos autores foram cruciais na constru??o do desenvolvimento econ?mico do Brasil entre as d?cadas de 1940-1970. A pesquisa utilizou m?todo hist?rico-relativista para analisar criticamente o texto original do debate, por conta do contexto latino-americano sob o qual se o mesmo se desencadeou. A an?lise relativista preconiza uma investiga??o de natureza extensa, isto ?, inclinada ao contexto hist?rico e social sob os quais ocorrem a concep??o de ideias. Os relativistas s?o pesquisadores que nutrem interesses nas rela??es da hist?ria do pensamento econ?mico com o arcabou?o intelectual do autor em quest?o; contrariamente aos ortodoxos schumpeterianos, s?o pesquisadores que nutrem interesses nas rela??es da hist?ria do pensamento econ?mico com o arcabou?o intelectual do autor em quest?o. Os resultados da investiga??o realizada mostram que as ideias defendidas por Simonsen foram as molas propulsoras do desenvolvimento do Brasil ao longo do per?odo estudado, dando base para a edifica??o dos principais planos de desenvolvimento da economia nacional: Plano de Metas, Plano de Acelera??o Econ?mica do Governo (PAEG), I Plano Nacional de Desenvolvimento, II Plano Nacional de Desenvolvimento, al?m da cria??o do Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento econ?mico (BNDE). / The debate on industrialization is bound to a classic controversy within the economy, which gained momentum during the twentieth century: planning and interventionism on the one hand, versus the free market on the other. This research seeks to rekindle the debate on industrialization taking focused the classic discussion of economic planning, which occurred in the 1940s during the Vargas government, between Eugenio Gudin and Roberto Simonsen. The goal is to expose as thought exposed by the authors were crucial in building the economic development of Brazil between the decades of 1940-1970. The research used historical-relativistic method to review the original text of the debate, on behalf of the Latin American context under which it was unleashed. The relativistic analysis calls for extensive research nature, that is, leaning to the historical and social context in which occur the design ideas. Relativists are researchers who nurture interests in the relations of the history of economic thought with the author's own intellectual framework in question. Relativists, contrary to orthodox Schumpeterian, are researchers who nurture interests in the relations of the history of economic thought with the author's own intellectual framework in question. The results of the research show that the ideas defended by Simonsen were the drivers of development in Brazil over the study period, giving the basis for the building of the main development plans of the national economy: Plan Goals, PAEG, I PND II PND and the creation of BNDE.