• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 4
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

L'histoire de La̕rt vue du grand siècle recherches sur L'abrégé de la vie des peintres, par Roger de Piles, 1699, et ses sources.

Teyssèdre, Bernard. January 1900 (has links)
Thèse Complémemtaire - Paris. / Bibliography: p. 369-937 [i.e. 397].
2

L'histoire de La̕rt vue du grand siècle recherches sur L'abrégé de la vie des peintres, par Roger de Piles, 1699, et ses sources.

Teyssèdre, Bernard. January 1900 (has links)
Thèse Complémemtaire - Paris. / Bibliography: p. 369-937 [i.e. 397].
3

La réception allemande de la théorie de l’art de Roger de Piles au XVIIIe siècle / The German reception of Roger de Piles’ theory of art in the 18th century

Carvalho, Anaïs 09 December 2016 (has links)
L’étude vise à dresser l’histoire de la réception de la théorie de l’art de Roger de Piles (1635-1709) dans l’espace germanophone au XVIIIe siècle. Accédant rapidement au statut de canons de la littérature artistique, les écrits de De Piles sont accueillis différemment selon les foyers politiques et culturels, selon les systèmes de diffusion et selon les acteurs de leur réception. La traduction de théories de l’art venant de l’étranger s’avère être, tout au long du XVIIIe siècle, un facteur fondamental dans la construction des théories allemandes de l’art de peindre. Entre 1699 et 1776, quatre ouvrages de, ou attribués à, l’auteur français sont publiés en langue allemande d’abord à Berlin, Hambourg puis Leipzig, par le peintre Samuel Theodor Gericke (1665-1729) et les amateurs Paul Jacob Marperger (1656-1730) et Georg Heinrich Martini (1722-1794). Certains sont réédités plusieurs fois ou retraduits hors des frontières du Saint Empire romain germanique, par Johann Dauw (1679-1723) et Tobias Querfurt (actif de 1732 à 1792). La réception allemande de la théorie du coloris de De Piles s’opère majoritairement en associations avec d’autres auteurs (Sandrart, Félibien, Lairesse, Testelin). Le processus d’assimilation du vocabulaire fixé par De Piles illustre l’évolution générale de la réception allemande de sa théorie. L’imprégnation des concepts depilesiens oscille entre fidélité, détournement et acculturation, dans une époque marquée par une recherche de corrélation entre théorie, pratique et goût de la peinture. Finalement, la position coloriste teintée d’éclectisme esquissée par De Piles s’épanouit dans le syncrétisme théorique et pratique de sa réception allemande. / The study aims to draw the history of the reception of Roger de Piles’ (1635-1709) theory, in the German area during the 18th century. Rapidly considered as a benchmark of artistic literature, De Piles’ writings are received differently according to political and cultural contexts, to dissemination system and to players of their reception. The translation of art theories coming from abroad happens to be, throughout the whole 18th century, a crucial factor in the construction of German theories of painting. Between 1699 and 1776, four books of, or attributed to, the French author are published in German, first in Berlin and Hamburg, then in Leipzig, by the painter Samuel Theodor Gericke (1665-1729) and by the connoisseurs Paul Jacob Marperger (1656-1730) and Georg Heinrich Martini (1722-1794). Some are republished several times or retranslated outside the borders of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation by Johann Dauw (1679-1723) and Tobias Querfurt (working from 1732 to 1792). The German reception of Roger de Piles’ theory of colouring occurs mainly in association with others authors (Sandrart, Félibien, Lairesse, Testelin). The assimilation process of the vocabulary established by De Piles illustrates the general evolution of the German reception of his theory. The impregnation of de Piles’ concepts fluctuates between fidelity, embezzlement and acculturation, in a period marked by a search of correlation between theory, practice and taste for painting. Eventually, the colourist position tinged with eclecticism sketched by de Piles prospers in the theoretical and practical syncretism of his German reception.
4

The Art of Pleasing the Eye : Portraits by Nicolas de Largillierre and Spectatorship with Taste for Colour in the Early Eighteenth Century

Roussinova, Roussina January 2015 (has links)
This study examines the interaction between portraits by the exponent of French colourist painting Nicolas de Largillierre (1656–1745) and elite spectatorship in the early eighteenth century as enactment of the idea of painting as an art of pleasing the eye. As developed in the theory of art of Roger de Piles (1635–1709), the idea of painting as an art of pleasing the eye coexisted with the classicist view, which in turn emphasised the potential of painting to communicate discursive meanings and hence to engage the mind. The idea of painting as an art of pleasing the eye was associated with a taste that valued the pictorial effects of painting and related to the ideal of honnêteté, which expanded on the art of pleasing in polite society by means of external appearances as a sign of social distinction. The aim of the study is to explore how portraits by Nicolas de Largillierre address the spectator and how such paintings might have come to have meaning for spectators in the early eighteenth century. To do this, the study takes a performative approach and defines meaning as a product of the interplay of pictorial effects and spectatorial response, progressing from the initial encounter throughout the sustained exploration of the paintings. Building on close analyses of selected paintings and readings of texts that bear on issues of pictorial imitation, spectatorship and social interaction, the study brings into focus the interplay of cognitive and sensory activities, including verbal articulation and bodily movement, which come into play in the production of meanings through the act of spectatorial experience. The study also emphasises the interplay of the mimetic and the material aspects of the paintings as an important bearer of meanings and identifies several interrelated sites of tension in which the pictorial effectiveness of the portraits resides. The study concludes by suggesting that to infer such meanings, the spectator should be prepared to respond to the address of the paintings actively, by engaging the mind, the senses and the body. Such an interpretation of the interaction between portrait paintings and spectators proposes a complex view of the ways in which artistic and spectatorial practices in the early eighteenth century might have interacted to create meanings while reproducing at the same time social and aesthetic conventions and ideals, such as the art of pleasing the eye. / <p>Fulltexten går inte att ladda ned eller att skriva ut pga upphovsrättslliga skäl. Går endast att läsa på skärmen.</p>
5

Rubens and the Stoic Baroque: Classical Stoic Ethics, Rhetoric, and Natural Philosophy in Rubens’s Style

Nutting, Catherine M. 18 January 2018 (has links)
Rubens is known as a painter; he should also be defined as an art theorist. Following Robert Williams’ theory that Early Modern art became philosophical, I believe that style can connote art theoretical interests and philosophical models, and that in Rubens’s case, these included the classical Stoic. While it would be possible to trace Rubens’s commitment to Stoicism in his subject matter, I investigate it in his style, taking a Baxandalian approach to inferential criticism. I focus on Rubens’s formal choices, his varied brushwork, and his ability to create a vibrant picture plane. My study is divided into chapters on Ethics, Logic, and Physics. In Chapter One I treat Stoic moral philosophy as an influence in the design of Rubens’s paintings, consider similarities between classical and Early Modern interest in viewer/reader response, and argue that Baroque artists could use style to avoid dogma while targeting viewers’ personal transformation. In Chapter Two I focus on Rhetoric, a section of the Stoic philosophy of Logic. Stoic Logic privileged truth: that is, it centred on investigating existing reality. As such, Stoic rhetorical theory and the classical literature influenced by it promoted a style that is complex and nuanced. I relate this to the Early Modern interest in copia, arguing that this includes Rubens’s painterly style which, apropos copia, should be better termed the Abundant Style. In Chapter Three I explore similarities between Stoic Natural Philosophy and the Early Modern artistic interest in the unified visual field. The Stoics defined the natural world as eternally moving and mixing; with force fields, energy, and elements in constant relationships of cause/effect. The Stoic concept of natural sympathy was a notion of material/energetic interrelatedness in which the world was seen as a living body, and the divine inhered in matter. I consider ways that these classical Stoic concepts of transformation, realism, and vivified matter might be discerned in Rubens’s style. / Graduate / 2023-12-14

Page generated in 0.042 seconds