In this work I discuss several key aspects of welfare economics and policy analysis and I propose two original contributions to the growing field of behavioral public policymaking. After providing a historical perspective of welfare economics and an overview of policy analysis processes in the introductory chapter, in chapter 2 I discuss a debated issue of policymaking, the choice of the social welfare function. I contribute to this debate by proposing an original methodological contribution based on the analysis of the quantitative relationship among different social welfare functional forms commonly used by policy analysts. In chapter 3 I then discuss a behavioral policy to contrast indirect tax evasion based on the use of lotteries. I show that the predictions of my model based on non-expected utility are consistent with observed, and so far unexplained, empirical evidence of the policy success. Finally, in chapter 4 I investigate by mean of a laboratory experiment the effects of social influence on the individual likelihood to engage in altruistic punishment. I show that bystanders’ decision to engage in punishment is influenced by the punishment behavior of their peers and I suggest ways to enact behavioral policies that exploit this finding.

The overarching question of this dissertation is: “why does the public debt grow, and why are fiscal (debt) crises repetitive and so widespread?” A special focus in answering this question is given to a fiscal constitution, which contains a country-specific set of laws, rules and regulations, and guides decision making in the area of fiscal policy. By shaping incentives and limiting arbitrariness, the fiscal constitution determines the course of fiscal policy and fiscal outcomes in the long term. This dissertation does not give, however, an exhaustive response to the overarching question. Instead it asks much narrower questions, which are selected after reviewing and identifying the main weaknesses and gaps in the modern literature on fiscal constitutions.

In the last decades, medical malpractice has been framed as one of the most critical issues for healthcare providers and health policy, holding a central role on both the policy agenda and public debate. The Law and Economics literature has devoted much attention to medical malpractice and to the investigation of the impact of malpractice reforms. Nonetheless, some reforms have been much less empirically studied as in the case of schedules, and their effects remain highly debated. The present work seeks to contribute to the study of medical malpractice and of schedules of noneconomic damages in a civil law country with a public national health system, using Italy as case study. Besides considering schedules and exploiting a quasi-experimental setting, the novelty of our contribution consists in the inclusion of the performance of the judiciary (measured as courts’ civil backlog) in the empirical analysis. The empirical analysis is twofold. First, it investigates how limiting compensations for pain and suffering through schedules impacts on the malpractice insurance market in terms of presence of private insurers and of premiums applied. Second, it examines whether, and to what extent, healthcare providers react to the implementation of this policy in terms of both levels and composition of the medical treatments offered. Our findings show that the introduction of schedules increases the presence of insurers only in inefficient courts, while it does not produce significant effects on paid premiums. Judicial inefficiency is attractive to insurers for average values of schedules penetration of the market, with an increasing positive impact of inefficiency as the territorial coverage of schedules increases. Moreover, the implementation of schedules tends to reduce the use of defensive practices on the part of clinicians, but the magnitude of this impact is ultimately determined by the actual degree of backlog of the court implementing schedules.

Costante è il dibattito relativo ai possibili sprechi nell’amministrazione della giustizia penale ed alle inefficienze dei tribunali, delle procure e, più in generale, dell’organizzazione giudiziaria e del processo. Può essere utile il tentativo di fornire a tale dibattito strumenti analitici innovativi, quali ad esempio l’analisi economica costi/benefici, con cui affrontare congiuntamente questioni di diritto ed osservazioni legate alla produzione degli uffici ed alla loro efficienza. È possibile, cioè, tentare di costruire e rendere disponibili dei semplici modelli economici – già diffusi nella letteratura anglosassone di law and economics – che, considerando le strutture preposte alla giurisdizione in termini di produzione e produttività e l’attore processuale come un’unità produttiva che opera con l’obiettivo di massimizzare i benefici ottenibili con le proprie risorse, facilitino lo studio del settore. Il tentativo di introdurre elementi di semplificazione e formalizzazione del comportamento dei soggetti della giurisdizione ha, infatti, grandissime potenzialità sia di carattere positivo sia di carattere normativo: permette, cioè, di interrogarsi sull’efficienza della funzione svolta dai tribunali e, nel caso di esito negativo, di capire come intervenire sulla struttura produttiva per ottenere una crescita di produttività. Tutto ciò in un contesto ove il court management sta emergendo come un nuovo campo fertile nello studio dei settori pubblici, in coerenza col crescente interesse nel definire quanto le corti (in generale) e le procure (più in particolare) siano performanti.

No description available.

This thesis is the result of my experience as a PhD student taking part in the Joint Doctoral Programme at the University of York and the University of Bologna. In my thesis I deal with topics that are of particular interest in Italy and in Great Britain. Chapter 2 focuses on the empirical test of the existence of the relationship between technological profiles and market structure claimed by Sutton’s theory (1991, 1998) in the specific economic framework of hospital care services provided by the Italian National Health Service (NHS). In order to test the empirical predictions by Sutton, we identify the relevant markets for hospital care services in Italy in terms of both product and geographic dimensions. In particular, the Elzinga and Hogarty (1978) approach has been applied to data on patients’ flows across Italian Provinces in order to derive the geographic dimension of each market. Our results provide evidence in favour of the empirical predictions of Sutton. Chapter 3 deals with the patient mobility in the Italian NHS. To analyse the determinants of patient mobility across Local Health Authorities, we estimate gravity equations in multiplicative form using a Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood method, as proposed by Santos-Silva and Tenreyro (2006). In particular, we focus on the scale effect played by the size of the pool of enrolees. In most of the cases our results are consistent with the predictions of the gravity model. Chapter 4 considers the effects of contractual and working conditions on selfassessed health and psychological well-being (derived from the General Health Questionnaire) using the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). We consider two branches of the literature. One suggests that “atypical” contractual conditions have a significant impact on health while the other suggests that health is damaged by adverse working conditions. The main objective of our paper is to combine the two branches of the literature to assess the distinct effects of contractual and working conditions on health. The results suggest that both sets of conditions have some influence on health and psychological well-being of employees.

This PhD Thesis is composed of three chapters, each discussing a specific type of risk that banks face. The first chapter talks about Systemic Risk and how banks get exposed to it through the Interbank Funding Market. Exposures in the said market have Systemic Risk implications because the market creates linkages, where the failure of one party can affect the others in the market. By showing that CDS Spreads, as bank risk indicators, are positively related to their Net Interbank Funding Market Exposures, this chapter establishes the above Systemic Risk Implications of Interbank Funding. Meanwhile, the second chapter discusses how banks may handle Illiquidity Risk, defined as the possibility of having sudden funding needs. Illiquidity Risk is embodied in this chapter through Loan Commitments as they oblige banks to lend to its clients, up to a certain amount of funds at any time. This chapter points out that using Securitization as funding facility, could allow the banks to manage this Illiquidity Risk. To make this case, this chapter demonstrates empirically that banks having an increase in Loan Commitments, may experience an increase in risk profile but such can be offset by an accompanying increase in Securitization Activity. Lastly, the third chapter focuses on how banks manage Credit Risk also through Securitization. Securitization has a Credit Risk management property by allowing the offloading of risk. This chapter investigates how banks use such property by looking at the effect of securitization on the banks’ loan portfolios and overall risk and returns. The findings are that securitization is positively related to loan portfolio size and the portfolio share of risky loans, which translates to higher risk and returns. Thus, this chapter points out that Credit Risk management through Securitization may be have been done towards higher risk taking for high returns.

La mia tesi di dottorato è una raccolta di tre articoli che considerano l'efficienza di strumenti diversi di tassazione in presenza di imperfezioni nei mercati dei fattori e nei processi produttivi. / My dissertation is a collection of three essays that consider the efficiency of different tax instruments in the presence of imperfections in the factor markets and in production processes.

L'obiettivo di questo lavoro e' l'estensione dell'approccio basato su opzioni reali alla valutazione delle tecnologie sanitarie. l'approccio al problema e' duplice. da un lato si vuole capire quale contributo questo sviluppo possa fornire alla comprensione dei meccanismi di adozione e diffusione di nuove tecnologie in sanità. l'altro obiettivo e' realizzare una concreta applicazione di questo approccio alla valutazione, che e' ancora assente nella letteratura di economia sanitaria. la tecnologia scelta per l'applicazione è la positron emission tomography (pet). / This work aims to extend the real option approach to the evaluation of health care technologies. The aim is to do this from two different points of view. On one side we are interested in understanding what insights taking option values into account provides in the study of adoption behaviour by providers. On the other side, we aim to provide an application of this approach to the economic evaluation of a specific medical technology, which is still missing in the health economics literature. The technology that has been chosen for the application is positron emission tomography (pet).

No description available.