No description available.

No description available.

Inclusive research based on collaborative partnership with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities has the potential to lead to relevant and meaningful research outcomes. An inclusive research approach is necessary for research endeavors which strive to improve the lives of LGBTQ+ people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, who experience layered stigma due to complex interactions between their disabilities, gender and sexual identities, and other sociocultural identities. In this dissertation, I present three research articles about the Rainbow Inclusion Speaking Up (RISE Up) Project, an inclusive research project with and for LGBTQ+ adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to promote gender and sexual self-determination. In chapter one, I define relevant terminology, justify the importance of inclusive research, and synthesize previous research on the experiences of LGBTQ+ people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In chapter two, I organize prior scholarship about planning inclusive research into five components and describe how I planned The RISE Up Project according to these components. Then, in chapter three, I present a qualitative interview-based study on the barriers and facilitators to gender and sexual self-determination in the lives of LGBTQ+ adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In chapter four, I share practical lessons from The RISE Up Project on conducting gender and sexualities research consistent with core principles of community-based participatory research. Throughout this work, and in chapter five, I highlight implications for conducting meaningful inclusive research and for promoting gender and sexual self-determination for LGBTQ+ adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Post-pandemic data demonstrate that there has been an increase in student mental health and behavioral needs, and these changes have a significant effect on the culture and climate of schools. School administrators have traditionally relied on suspension to address challenging behaviors, yet this approach has not been shown to be effective. While alternative approaches to discipline and behavioral response have been adopted, it is unclear when and how principals decide to use these approaches. In this phenomenological study, I interviewed 12 New Hampshire principals about their experiences with student behavior and discipline, including their responses to and attributions for student behavior. Participants identified student, school, and family factors that were important in their disciplinary decision-making. Themes that emerged included balancing equity and equality, the “moral wrangling” associated with disciplinary decision-making and the emotional toll on principals. Principals’ attributions for behavior are discussed, and disciplinary responses were examined for their association with those attributions. Findings from this dissertation have the potential to guide the provision of resources for school administrators and to inform practice and policy to support students experiencing emotional and behavioral challenges at school.

In this three-study dissertation, I present an in-depth examination of patterns in the paraeducator workforce across two states: Indiana and Washington. In each study, I leverage longitudinal administrative data to answer questions about the distribution, turnover, and impact of paraeducators in the workforce using both descriptive and causal methods. Together, these studies indicate that paraeducators are often unevenly distributed across contexts (e.g., by school urbanicity, student enrollment by subgroup) and these contexts play a role in shaping workforce patterns among paraeducators. More specifically, I find differential statewide distributions in paraeducator allocation based on district characteristics, differential risk for turnover based on paraeducator characteristics (such as race/ethnicity, gender, experience, and salary), but universally limited impacts of paraeducator turnover on student test scores. While the latter finding was surprising given substantial research demonstrating the critical role of paraeducators in supporting students and teachers, I discuss the implications of such a finding, including that educators, policymakers, and researchers need to look beyond programmatic silos (i.e., general education and special education) to develop effective educational systems. Together, these studies indicate that paraeducators are often unevenly distributed across contexts (e.g., by school urbanicity, student enrollment by subgroup) and these contexts — in combination with personal characteristics — play a role in shaping workforce patterns among paraeducators. Overall, this dissertation adds to the growing body of literature that uses administrative data to answer questions of consequence in special education and illuminates an area of the workforce often looked past in large-scale quantitative analyses. This work holds implications for research, practice, and policy, particularly around diversity in the educator workforce, policy incentives for educator retention, and increasing the quality and use of administrative data and research on the paraeducator workforce.

No description available.

Thesis (Ed. D.)--West Virginia University, 1999. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vii, 321 p. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 287-308).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1970. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Rowan University, 2005. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.S.)--Eastern Illinois University, 1986. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 56-61).