Global ETD Search

1	Den amerikanska värdepapperslagstiftningens extraterritoriella effekt : Särskilt vid offentliga uppköpserbjudanden på aktiemarknaden Gulam, Ian January 2014 (has links) No description available. extraterritoriell effekt amerikansk värdepapperslagstiftning extraterritoriell tillämpning offentliga uppköpserbjudanden Morrison v National Australia Bank extraterritoriallitet Dodd-Frank Act Securities Act Securities Exchange Act gränsöverskridande
2	Why Canada's "Costly" Securities Regulation Regime Ensures Better Decision-making Spilke, Ezra 27 November 2012 (has links) The purported costs of provincial autonomy in Canadian securities regulation have been well documented. Proposals for centralizing the securities regulatory regime, whether under a national regulator or through restricting the scope of provincial divergence from national standards, have consistently cited the costliness of the current regime. However, policymakers' cognitive biases lead them from time to time to overemphasize the need for decisive and swift action, which in turn causes them to abandon sound decision-making processes. Provincial autonomy ensures that policymaking with national reach is process-oriented and is more likely to be guided by facts and rational projections. Supporters of centralization discount or ignore these features of decentralization and are too sanguine about the ability of centralized regulators to adhere to process. Any further proposals for reform should properly account for these effects. heuristics bias action bias availability bias rational expedience salutary inefficiency paternalism systemic risk behavioral economics cost-benefit securities regulation decentralization regulatory competition Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance passport system compliance cost federalism single regulator harmonization provincial autonomy Securities Act Reference 098
3	Why Canada's "Costly" Securities Regulation Regime Ensures Better Decision-making Spilke, Ezra 27 November 2012 (has links) The purported costs of provincial autonomy in Canadian securities regulation have been well documented. Proposals for centralizing the securities regulatory regime, whether under a national regulator or through restricting the scope of provincial divergence from national standards, have consistently cited the costliness of the current regime. However, policymakers' cognitive biases lead them from time to time to overemphasize the need for decisive and swift action, which in turn causes them to abandon sound decision-making processes. Provincial autonomy ensures that policymaking with national reach is process-oriented and is more likely to be guided by facts and rational projections. Supporters of centralization discount or ignore these features of decentralization and are too sanguine about the ability of centralized regulators to adhere to process. Any further proposals for reform should properly account for these effects. heuristics bias action bias availability bias rational expedience salutary inefficiency paternalism systemic risk behavioral economics cost-benefit securities regulation decentralization regulatory competition Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance passport system compliance cost federalism single regulator harmonization provincial autonomy Securities Act Reference 098

1

Page generated in 0.0589 seconds