<p>When launching a satellite a separation system is used to keep the satellite attached to a launch vehicle during ascent and to separate it from the launch vehicle while in space. In separation analysis the separation is studied by simulations to see if requirements on the system can be fulfilled. The purpose of this master’s thesis is to investigate if separation analysis can be done using the modeling program OpenModelica and to evaluate OpenModelica and compare it to other modeling programs.</p><p>OpenModelica is free software implementing the Modelica language, which is an object-oriented language for modeling and simulation of complex physical systems. Modelica uses equation-based modeling, this means that the physical behaviour of a model is described by differential, algebraic and discrete equations and no particular variable needs to be solved manually.</p><p>The work is divided into two parts. The main part is to implement a mathematical model of a separation system in OpenModelica, simulate it and study the behaviour of the system. A Monte Carlo method, which randomly generates values for uncertain model parameters, is used when simulating the model. The other part of the work is to evaluate OpenModelica and compare it with other modeling programs, such as Matlab/Simulink, C/C++ and JAVA to see advantages and disadvantages with OpenModelica.</p>

When launching a satellite a separation system is used to keep the satellite attached to a launch vehicle during ascent and to separate it from the launch vehicle while in space. In separation analysis the separation is studied by simulations to see if requirements on the system can be fulfilled. The purpose of this master’s thesis is to investigate if separation analysis can be done using the modeling program OpenModelica and to evaluate OpenModelica and compare it to other modeling programs. OpenModelica is free software implementing the Modelica language, which is an object-oriented language for modeling and simulation of complex physical systems. Modelica uses equation-based modeling, this means that the physical behaviour of a model is described by differential, algebraic and discrete equations and no particular variable needs to be solved manually. The work is divided into two parts. The main part is to implement a mathematical model of a separation system in OpenModelica, simulate it and study the behaviour of the system. A Monte Carlo method, which randomly generates values for uncertain model parameters, is used when simulating the model. The other part of the work is to evaluate OpenModelica and compare it with other modeling programs, such as Matlab/Simulink, C/C++ and JAVA to see advantages and disadvantages with OpenModelica.

According to the statistics about civil transportation aircraft Environmental Control system (ECS), the three-wheel high pressure water separation system (HPWS) and low pressure water separation system (LPWS) are the most common choices for the 150-seat airliners. Although the former has become the mainstream configuration for air conditioning pack, the latter is still used on Boeing 737-600/700. In order to compare the two configurations and choose the better one for a specific aircraft, simulation and analysis are done. The cabin heat load is calculated at first in order to calculate required engine bleed air mass flow. Then a specific aircraft is defined so that required structural dimensions and cabin comfort indexes can be obtained based on Airbus 320. Thirdly, the component models are built by Matlab/Simulink according to the fundamental knowledge of heat transfer and aerodynamics, the working principles and mechanical dimensions of the components, the ambient environmental parameters and some data from Airbus 320. Consequently, the complete system model can be assembled. After confirming the validity of the model by checking the required ram air mass flow and temperature deviation of the state points referred to Airbus 320, the simulation model is used to do analyze the specific aircraft. Finally, through comparing the different values of ram air mass flow and turbine expansion ratio, as well as the system mass, economic cost and reliability, the better configuration is selected. It can be summarized that the three-wheel LPWS requires less ram air mass flow (0.012kg/s) and a little lower expansion ratio (0.02) than the HPWS, and it also has lower weight (63% of HPWS), lower (83% of HPWS) cost and higher reliability (140% of HPWS), thus it is the suitable configuration for the specific aircraft.

Three different concentrated whole milks (2.5x, 2.75x, and 3.0x) were produced by mixing equal parts of ultrafiltration retentate of whole milk and reverse osmosis retentate of the UF milk permeate. The concentrated whole milks were ultra-high temperature processed by direct steam injection (140.6°C) followed by flash cooling and two-stage homogenization pressures (2500/500 psi, 3500/700 psi, or 4500/900 psi). The milk concentrates were packaged aseptically and stored at room temperature. On the other hand, the milk concentrates produced by the RO single membrane system with the same concentration levels served as the control. Physicochemical properties of the milks were surveyed every 2 weeks during a 6-month storage period. The milk concentrates combined from the blending of multiple-membrane retentates showed the expeected concentrations of all major nutrients except nonprotein nitrogen. A 20% to 32% shortage of nonprotein nitrogen permeated through the RO membrane during the production of the concentrated whole milks. Over the 6 months' storage, nonprotein nitrogen content did not significantly change in the 2.5x, 2.75x, and 3.0x concentrated whole milks. No microbial growth or enzyme activity was measured or observed in the samples collected. Milk concentrated 2.5x with 4500/900psi homogenization pressure did not show cream plug formation during the first 5 months of storage. Milk concentrated 2.75x with 4500/900 psi homogenization pressure had the approximate cream plug level of the 2.5x concentrated milk at 4 months of storage. Milk concentrated 3.0x with 4500/900 psi homegenization pressure showed cream plugging at 2.5 months. As higher homogenization pressure was applied to the milk concentrates, less creaming occurred at all milk concentration levels. Homogenization at all pressures did not reduce or eliminate sedimentation during storage. The milk concentrates from the control RO membrane processing showed less sedimentation than did the concentrates from the multiple membrane system at the same homogenization pressure (2500/500 psi). the higher the concentration of total milk solids, the more sedimentation occurred. Viscosity was not affected by homogenization pressure in any of the concentrated whole milks.