• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Applying pressure sensors and size differences in running shoes fit measurement.

January 2007 (has links)
Cheng, Yuk Lap. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 64-67). / Abstracts in English and Chinese; appendix and questionnaire also in Chinese. / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT --- p.I / ABSTRACT --- p.II / TABLE OF CONTENT --- p.V / LIST OF FIGURES --- p.VII / LIST OF TABLES --- p.VIII / Chapter I --- INTRODUCTION --- p.1 / Background --- p.1 / Statement of Problem --- p.3 / Hypothesis --- p.3 / Significance of Study --- p.4 / Theoretical Contribution --- p.4 / Practical Contribution --- p.4 / Operational Definition --- p.5 / Chapter II --- REVIEW OF LITERATURE --- p.7 / Problem of poor fitting --- p.7 / Common foot problem --- p.10 / Definition of fit --- p.11 / Recommendation of shoe fit --- p.13 / Sizing --- p.13 / Pressure distribution --- p.14 / Subjective fit --- p.15 / Footwear Comfort --- p.15 / Chapter III --- METHODOLOGY --- p.18 / Design --- p.18 / Subject --- p.18 / Instrumentation --- p.18 / Fit questionnaire --- p.18 / Foot scanner --- p.19 / Pressure sensors --- p.19 / Running shoes --- p.20 / Shoe lasts --- p.20 / Procedure --- p.21 / Foot scanning --- p.22 / Fit questionnaire --- p.24 / Set up --- p.24 / Reliability test --- p.25 / Pressure measurement --- p.25 / Data Reduction --- p.29 / Foot scanning --- p.29 / Fit questionnaire --- p.29 / Video --- p.29 / Pressure distribution --- p.30 / Data Analysis --- p.30 / Chapter IV --- RESULT --- p.32 / Subject Detail --- p.32 / Questionnaire --- p.32 / Fit Rating --- p.37 / Size Difference --- p.39 / Pressure Distribution --- p.43 / Regression --- p.46 / Chapter V --- DISCUSSION --- p.52 / Subjective fit rating --- p.52 / Reliability of the fit questionnaire --- p.52 / Fit rating --- p.53 / Size --- p.54 / Foot shape --- p.54 / Dimensional Difference --- p.54 / Correlation with subjective fit --- p.55 / Pressure --- p.58 / Dimensional Difference and Pressure --- p.59 / Subjective fit and objective measures --- p.60 / Limitation --- p.61 / Future Direction --- p.62 / Chapter VI --- CONCLUSION --- p.63 / Chapter VII --- REFERENCE --- p.64 / APPENDIX / Appendix A -Explanation of study --- p.68 / Appendix B - Informed consent --- p.69 / Appendix C - Footwear fit questionnaire --- p.70 / Appendix D -Explanations of fit questionnaire --- p.72 / Appendix E - Anthropometric information of the subjects --- p.73 / Appendix F - Fit rating --- p.74 / Appendix G - Foot dimensions of the subjects --- p.89 / Appendix H - Foot - last size difference of each subject --- p.90 / Appendix I - Guilford's suggested interpretation for value of r --- p.92

Page generated in 0.0245 seconds