Spelling suggestions: "subject:"bimulated image noise"" "subject:"8imulated image noise""
1 |
How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality?Gislason-Lee, Amber J., Kumcu, A., Kengyelics, S.M., Brettle, D.S., Treadgold, L.A., Sivananthan, M., Davies, A.G. 27 October 2015 (has links)
Yes / Cardiologists use x-ray image sequences of the moving heart acquired in real-time to diagnose and
treat cardiac patients. The amount of radiation used is proportional to image quality; however, exposure to radiation
is damaging to patients and personnel. The amount by which radiation dose can be reduced without compromising
patient care was determined. For five patient image sequences, increments of computer-generated
quantum noise (white + colored) were added to the images, frame by frame using pixel-to-pixel addition, to
simulate corresponding increments of dose reduction. The noise adding software was calibrated for settings
used in cardiac procedures, and validated using standard objective and subjective image quality measurements.
The degraded images were viewed next to corresponding original (not degraded) images in a two-alternativeforced-
choice staircase psychophysics experiment. Seven cardiologists and five radiographers selected their
preferred image based on visualization of the coronary arteries. The point of subjective equality, i.e., level
of degradation where the observer could not perceive a difference between the original and degraded images,
was calculated; for all patients the median was 33% 15% dose reduction. This demonstrates that a 33%
15% increase in image noise is feasible without being perceived, indicating potential for 33% 15% dose reduction
without compromising patient care. / Funded in part by Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands. Part of this work has been performed in the project PANORAMA, co-funded by grants from Belgium, Italy, France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, and the ENIAC Joint Undertaking.
|
2 |
How much image noise can be added in cardiac x-ray imaging without loss in perceived image quality?Gislason-Lee, Amber J., Kumcu, A., Kengyelics, S.M., Rhodes, L.A., Davies, A.G. 16 March 2015 (has links)
Yes / Dynamic X-ray imaging systems are used for interventional cardiac procedures to treat coronary heart disease.
X-ray settings are controlled automatically by specially-designed X-ray dose control mechanisms whose role is to ensure
an adequate level of image quality is maintained with an acceptable radiation dose to the patient. Current commonplace
dose control designs quantify image quality by performing a simple technical measurement directly from the image.
However, the utility of cardiac X-ray images is in their interpretation by a cardiologist during an interventional
procedure, rather than in a technical measurement. With the long term goal of devising a clinically-relevant image
quality metric for an intelligent dose control system, we aim to investigate the relationship of image noise with clinical
professionals’ perception of dynamic image sequences.
Computer-generated noise was added, in incremental amounts, to angiograms of five different patients selected
to represent the range of adult cardiac patient sizes. A two alternative forced choice staircase experiment was used to
determine the amount of noise which can be added to a patient image sequences without changing image quality as
perceived by clinical professionals. Twenty-five viewing sessions (five for each patient) were completed by thirteen
observers. Results demonstrated scope to increase the noise of cardiac X-ray images by up to 21% ± 8% before it is
noticeable by clinical professionals. This indicates a potential for 21% radiation dose reduction since X-ray image noise
and radiation dose are directly related; this would be beneficial to both patients and personnel. / This work was funded by Philips Healthcare, NL. Part of this work has been performed in the project PANORAMA, cofunded by grants from Belgium, Italy, France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, and the ENIAC Joint Undertaking.
|
Page generated in 0.0526 seconds