We revisit the optimal investment and consumption model of Davis and Norman (1990) and Shreve and Soner (1994), following a shadow-price approach similar to that of Kallsen and Muhle-Karbe (2010). Making use of the completeness of the model without transaction costs, we reformulate and reduce the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for this singular stochastic control problem to a non-standard free-boundary problem for a first-order ODE with an integral constraint. Having shown that the free boundary problem has a smooth solution, we use it to construct the solution of the original optimal investment/consumption problem in a self-contained manner and without any recourse to the dynamic programming principle. By analyzing the properties of the free boundary problem, we provide an explicit characterization of model parameters for which the value function is finite. Furthermore, we prove that the value function, as well as the slopes of the lines demarcating the no-trading region, can be expanded as a series of integer powers of [lambda superscript 1/3]. The coefficients of arbitrary order in this expansion can be computed. / text

Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits(GMWB) have become popular riders on variable annuities. The pricing of a GMWB contract was originally formulated as a singular stochastic control problem which results in a Hamilton Jacobi Bellman (HJB) Variational Inequality (VI). A penalty method method can then be used to solve the HJB VI. We present a rigorous proof of convergence of the penalty method to the viscosity solution of the HJB VI assuming the underlying asset follows a Geometric Brownian Motion. A direct control method is an alternative formulation for the HJB VI. We also extend the HJB VI to the case of where the underlying asset follows a Poisson jump diffusion. The HJB VI is normally solved numerically by an implicit method, which gives rise to highly nonlinear discretized algebraic equations. The classic policy iteration approach works well for the Geometric Brownian Motion case. However it is not efficient in some circumstances such as when the underlying asset follows a Poisson jump diffusion process. We develop a combined fixed point policy iteration scheme which significantly increases the efficiency of solving the discretized equations. Sufficient conditions to ensure the convergence of the combined fixed point policy iteration scheme are derived both for the penalty method and direct control method. The GMWB formulated as a singular control problem has a special structure which results in a block matrix fixed point policy iteration converging about one order of magnitude faster than a full matrix fixed point policy iteration. Sufficient conditions for convergence of the block matrix fixed point policy iteration are derived. Estimates for bounds on the penalty parameter (penalty method) and scaling parameter (direct control method) are obtained so that convergence of the iteration can be expected in the presence of round-off error.

Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits(GMWB) have become popular riders on variable annuities. The pricing of a GMWB contract was originally formulated as a singular stochastic control problem which results in a Hamilton Jacobi Bellman (HJB) Variational Inequality (VI). A penalty method method can then be used to solve the HJB VI. We present a rigorous proof of convergence of the penalty method to the viscosity solution of the HJB VI assuming the underlying asset follows a Geometric Brownian Motion. A direct control method is an alternative formulation for the HJB VI. We also extend the HJB VI to the case of where the underlying asset follows a Poisson jump diffusion. The HJB VI is normally solved numerically by an implicit method, which gives rise to highly nonlinear discretized algebraic equations. The classic policy iteration approach works well for the Geometric Brownian Motion case. However it is not efficient in some circumstances such as when the underlying asset follows a Poisson jump diffusion process. We develop a combined fixed point policy iteration scheme which significantly increases the efficiency of solving the discretized equations. Sufficient conditions to ensure the convergence of the combined fixed point policy iteration scheme are derived both for the penalty method and direct control method. The GMWB formulated as a singular control problem has a special structure which results in a block matrix fixed point policy iteration converging about one order of magnitude faster than a full matrix fixed point policy iteration. Sufficient conditions for convergence of the block matrix fixed point policy iteration are derived. Estimates for bounds on the penalty parameter (penalty method) and scaling parameter (direct control method) are obtained so that convergence of the iteration can be expected in the presence of round-off error.

This thesis consists of a summary and five papers, dealing with financial applications of optimal stopping, optimal control and volatility. In Paper I, we present a method to recover a time-independent piecewise constant volatility from a finite set of perpetual American put option prices. In Paper II, we study the optimal liquidation problem under the assumption that the asset price follows a geometric Brownian motion with unknown drift, which takes one of two given values. The optimal strategy is to liquidate the first time the asset price falls below a monotonically increasing, continuous time-dependent boundary. In Paper III, we investigate the optimal liquidation problem under the assumption that the asset price follows a jump-diffusion with unknown intensity, which takes one of two given values. The best liquidation strategy is to sell the asset the first time the jump process falls below or goes above a monotone time-dependent boundary. Paper IV treats the optimal dividend problem in a model allowing for positive jumps of the underlying firm value. The optimal dividend strategy is of barrier type, i.e. to pay out all surplus above a certain level as dividends, and then pay nothing as long as the firm value is below this level. Finally, in Paper V it is shown that a necessary and sufficient condition for the explosion of implied volatility near expiry in exponential Lévy models is the existence of jumps towards the strike price in the underlying process.